J Korean Neurosurg Soc.  2014 Jan;55(1):32-35. 10.3340/jkns.2014.55.1.32.

Treatment for Giant Fusiform Aneurysm Located in the Cavernous Segment of the Internal Carotid Artery Using the Pipeline Embolization Device

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Neurosurgery, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea. nsshin@gmail.com
  • 2Department of Radiology, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
  • 3Department of Neurosurgery, Gachon University, Gil Hospital, Incheon, Korea.

Abstract

The pipeline embolization device (PED) is a new endovascular device for treatment of complex, fusiform and wide-neck intracranial aneurysms. The main mechanism of this stent is to divert the flow in the parent artery with reduction of inflow in the aneurysm leading to thrombosis. We treated a 40-year-old woman who had left facial pain and orbit discomfort. Angiography showed a giant fusiform aneurysm located in the cavernous segment of the left internal carotid artery. A PED was successfully deployed across the aneurysm. The procedure and post-procedural course were uneventful. After 3 months, angiography showed complete obliteration of the aneurysm with good patency of the branching vessels originating from the deployed segment. The patient's symptoms improved completely without complications.

Keyword

Pipeline embolization device; Fusiform aneurysm

MeSH Terms

Adult
Aneurysm*
Angiography
Arteries
Carotid Artery, Internal*
Facial Pain
Female
Humans
Intracranial Aneurysm
Orbit
Parents
Stents
Thrombosis

Figure

  • Fig. 1 Preprocedural angiography with AP (A) and lateral (B) views and three-dimensional reconstruction angiography (C) show a giant fusiform aneurysm involving the cavernous segment of the left internal carotid artery.

  • Fig. 2 Immediate postprocedural angiography with AP (A) and lateral (B) views show that filling of the aneurysmal sac is slower than preprocedural angiography. DynaCT (C) shows stagnation of the contrast within the sac and good position with no redundant portions or stenosis of the device.

  • Fig. 3 AP (A) and lateral (B) views of 3-month angiography demonstrate anatomic reconstruction of the parent artery with complete occlusion of the aneurysm with the meningohypophyseal trunk preserved.


Cited by  2 articles

Healing of Aneurysm after Treatment Using Flow Diverter Stent : Histopathological Study in Experimental Canine Carotid Side Wall Aneurysm
Jong Young Lee, Young Dae Cho, Hyun-Seung Kang, Moon Hee Han
J Korean Neurosurg Soc. 2020;63(1):34-44.    doi: 10.3340/jkns.2019.0067.

Inadvertent Complication of a Pipeline Embolization Device for Treatment with Vertebral Artery Dissecting Aneurysm : Distal Tip Fracture of Delivery Wire
Jung Soo Park, Hyo Sung Kwak, Jong Myong Lee
J Korean Neurosurg Soc. 2016;59(5):521-524.    doi: 10.3340/jkns.2016.59.5.521.


Reference

1. Berge J, Biondi A, Machi P, Brunel H, Pierot L, Gabrillargues J, et al. Flow-diverter silk stent for the treatment of intracranial aneurysms : 1-year follow-up in a multicenter study. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2012; 33:1150–1155. PMID: 22300924.
Article
2. Brinjikji W, Murad MH, Lanzino G, Cloft HJ, Kallmes DF. Endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms with flow diverters : a meta-analysis. Stroke. 2013; 44:442–447. PMID: 23321438.
Article
3. Cebral JR, Mut F, Raschi M, Scrivano E, Ceratto R, Lylyk P, et al. Aneurysm rupture following treatment with flow-diverting stents : computational hemodynamics analysis of treatment. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2011; 32:27–33. PMID: 21071533.
Article
4. Chalouhi N, Satti SR, Tjoumakaris S, Dumont AS, Gonzalez LF, Rosenwasser R, et al. Delayed migration of a pipeline embolization device. Neurosurgery. 2013; 72(2 Suppl Operative):ons229–ons234. discussion ons234. PMID: 23190638.
Article
5. Cruz JP, Chow M, O'Kelly C, Marotta B, Spears J, Montanera W, et al. Delayed ipsilateral parenchymal hemorrhage following flow diversion for the treatment of anterior circulation aneurysms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2012; 33:603–608. PMID: 22403783.
Article
6. Evans JJ, Sekhar LN, Rak R, Stimac D. Bypass grafting and revascularization in the management of posterior circulation aneurysms. Neurosurgery. 2004; 55:1036–1049. PMID: 15509310.
Article
7. Fiorella D, Woo HH, Albuquerque FC, Nelson PK. Definitive reconstruction of circumferential, fusiform intracranial aneurysms with the pipeline embolization device. Neurosurgery. 2008; 62:1115–1120. discussion 1120-1121. PMID: 18580809.
Article
8. Fischer S, Vajda Z, Aguilar Perez M, Schmid E, Hopf N, Bäzner H, et al. Pipeline embolization device (PED) for neurovascular reconstruction : initial experience in the treatment of 101 intracranial aneurysms and dissections. Neuroradiology. 2012; 54:369–382. PMID: 21881914.
Article
9. Kan P, Siddiqui AH, Veznedaroglu E, Liebman KM, Binning MJ, Dumont TM, et al. Early postmarket results after treatment of intracranial aneurysms with the pipeline embolization device : a U.S. multicenter experience. Neurosurgery. 2012; 71:1080–1087. discussion 1087-1088. PMID: 22948199.
10. Klisch J, Turk A, Turner R, Woo HH, Fiorella D. Very late thrombosis of flow-diverting constructs after the treatment of large fusiform posterior circulation aneurysms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2011; 32:627–632. PMID: 21436336.
Article
11. Kulcsár Z, Ernemann U, Wetzel SG, Bock A, Goericke S, Panagiotopoulos V, et al. High-profile flow diverter (silk) implantation in the basilar artery : efficacy in the treatment of aneurysms and the role of the perforators. Stroke. 2010; 41:1690–1696. PMID: 20616327.
12. Kulcsár Z, Houdart E, Bonafé A, Parker G, Millar J, Goddard AJ, et al. Intra-aneurysmal thrombosis as a possible cause of delayed aneurysm rupture after flow-diversion treatment. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2011; 32:20–25. PMID: 21071538.
Article
13. Lawton MT, Hamilton MG, Morcos JJ, Spetzler RF. Revascularization and aneurysm surgery : current techniques, indications, and outcome. Neurosurgery. 1996; 38:83–92. discussion 92-94. PMID: 8747955.
14. Lubicz B, Collignon L, Raphaeli G, De Witte O. Pipeline flow-diverter stent for endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms : preliminary experience in 20 patients with 27 aneurysms. World Neurosurg. 2011; 76:114–119. PMID: 21839962.
Article
15. Lylyk P, Miranda C, Ceratto R, Ferrario A, Scrivano E, Luna HR, et al. Curative endovascular reconstruction of cerebral aneurysms with the pipeline embolization device : the Buenos Aires experience. Neurosurgery. 2009; 64:632–642. discussion 642-643; quiz N6. PMID: 19349825.
16. McAuliffe W, Wycoco V, Rice H, Phatouros C, Singh TJ, Wenderoth J. Immediate and midterm results following treatment of unruptured intracranial aneurysms with the pipeline embolization device. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2012; 33:164–170. PMID: 21979492.
Article
17. Nelson PK, Lylyk P, Szikora I, Wetzel SG, Wanke I, Fiorella D. The pipeline embolization device for the intracranial treatment of aneurysms trial. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2011; 32:34–40. PMID: 21148256.
Article
18. Pierot L. Flow diverter stents in the treatment of intracranial aneurysms : Where are we? J Neuroradiol. 2011; 38:40–46. PMID: 21257202.
Article
19. Saatci I, Yavuz K, Ozer C, Geyik S, Cekirge HS. Treatment of intracranial aneurysms using the pipeline flow-diverter embolization device : a single-center experience with long-term follow-up results. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2012; 33:1436–1446. PMID: 22821921.
Article
20. Sekhar LN, Duff JM, Kalavakonda C, Olding M. Cerebral revascularization using radial artery grafts for the treatment of complex intracranial aneurysms : techniques and outcomes for 17 patients. Neurosurgery. 2001; 49:646–658. discussion 658-659. PMID: 11523676.
Article
21. Shankar JJ, Vandorpe R, Pickett G, Maloney W. SILK flow diverter for treatment of intracranial aneurysms : initial experience and cost analysis. J Neurointerv Surg. 2013; 5(Suppl 3):iii11–iii15. PMID: 23424227.
22. Siddiqui AH, Kan P, Abla AA, Hopkins LN, Levy EI. Complications after treatment with pipeline embolization for giant distal intracranial aneurysms with or without coil embolization. Neurosurgery. 2012; 71:E509–E513. discussion E513. PMID: 22710418.
Article
23. Spetzler RF, Carter LP. Revascularization and aneurysm surgery : current status. Neurosurgery. 1985; 16:111–116. PMID: 3883217.
Article
24. Szikora I, Berentei Z, Kulcsar Z, Marosfoi M, Vajda ZS, Lee W, et al. Treatment of intracranial aneurysms by functional reconstruction of the parent artery : the Budapest experience with the pipeline embolization device. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2010; 31:1139–1147. PMID: 20150304.
Article
25. Turjman F, Acevedo G, Moll T, Duquesnel J, Eloy R, Sindou M. Treatment of experimental carotid aneurysms by endoprosthesis implantation : preliminary report. Neurol Res. 1993; 15:181–184. PMID: 8103584.
Article
26. Turowski B, Macht S, Kulcsár Z, Hänggi D, Stummer W. Early fatal hemorrhage after endovascular cerebral aneurysm treatment with a flow diverter (SILK-Stent): do we need to rethink our concepts? Neuroradiology. 2011; 53:37–41. PMID: 20339842.
Article
27. U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Summary of Safety and Effectiveness Data, Pipeline Embolization Device, P100018. 2011. http://www.accessdata.fda.gov/cdrh_docs/pdf10/P100018a.pdf.
28. van Rooij WJ, Sluzewski M. Perforator infarction after placement of a pipeline flow-diverting stent for an unruptured A1 aneurysm. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2010; 31:E43–E44. PMID: 20150311.
29. Wong GK, Lau JC, Poon WS. Flow diverting stents for cerebral aneurysm treatment : time to replace coiling? J Clin Neurosci. 2011; 18:1143. PMID: 21719290.
Article
Full Text Links
  • JKNS
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr