1. Manhart J, Scheibenhogen FA, Chen HY, Hiekel R. A 2-year clinical study of composite and ceramic inlays. Clin Oral Investig. 2000. 4:192–198.
Article
2. Peumans M, Van Meerbeek B, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G. Porcelain Veneers; a review of the literature. J Dent. 2000. 28:163–177.
Article
3. Mitchell CA, Abbariki M, Orr JF. The influence of luting cement on the probabilities of survival and modes of failure of cast full-coveraged crowns. Dent Mater. 2000. 16:198–206.
Article
4. Knox J, Kralj B, Hubsch PF, Middleton J, Jones ML. An evaluation of the influence of orthodontic adhesive on the stresses generated in a bonded bracket finite element model. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2001. 119:43–53.
Article
5. el-Mowafy O, Rubo MH. Retention of a posterior resin-bonded fixed partial denture with a modified design : an in vitro study. Int J Prosthodont. 2000. 13:425–431.
6. Platt JA. Resin cements into the 21st century. Compend Contin Educ Dent. 1999. 20:1173–1184.
7. Diaz-Arnold AM, Vargas MA, Haselton DR. Current status of luting agents for fixed prosthodontics. J Prosthet Dent. 1999. 81:135–141.
Article
8. Lopes GC, Baratieri LN, de Andrada MA, Vieira LC. Dental adhesion: present state of the art and future perspectives. Quintessence Int. 2002. 33:213–224.
9. Choi KK, Kim SW, Choi HY. Effect of filler addition to bonding agents on the physical properties and the bond strength to bovine teeth. The First International Congress on Adhesive Dentistry(IAD, Program and Abstracts). 2002. –434.
10. Carvalho RM, Pegoraro TA, Tay FR, Pegoraro LF, Pashley DH. Adhesive permeability affects coupling of resin cements that utilise self-etching primers to dentine. J Dent. 2004. 32:55–65.
Article
11. Kugel G, Ferrari M. The science of bonding: from first to sixth generation. J Am Dent Assoc. 2000. 131:Suppl. 20S–25S.
Article
12. Tanumiharja M, Burrow MF, Tyas MJ. Microntensile bond strengths of seven dentin adhesive systems. Dent Mater. 2000. 16:180–187.
13. Prati C, Chersoni S, Mongiorgi R, Pashley DH. Resin-infiltrated dentin layer formation of new bonding systems. Oper Dent. 1998. 23:185–194.
14. Tay FR, Sano H, Carvalho RM, Pashley EL, Pashley DH. An ultra-structural study of the influence of acidity of self-etching primers and smear layers thickness on bonding to intact dentin. J Adhes Dent. 2000. 2:83–98.
15. Tay FR, King NM, Suh BI, Pashley DH. Effect of delayed activation of light-cured resin composites on bonding of all-in-one adhesives. J Adhes Dent. 2001. 3:207–225.
16. Tay FR, Pashley DH, Suh BI, Carvalho RM, Itthagarun A. Single-step adhesives are permeable membranes. J Dent. 2002. 30:371–382.
Article
17. Cheong C, King NM, Pashley DH, Ferrari M, Toledano M, Tay FR. Incompatibility of self-etch adhesives with chemical/dual-cured composites: two-step vs one-step systems. Oper Dent. 2003. 28:747–755.
18. Krämer N, Lohbauer U, Frankenberger R. Adhesive luting of indirect restorations. Am J Dent. 2000. 13:60D–76D.
19. Hasegawa EA, Boyer DB, Chan DC. Hardening of dual-cured cements under composite resin inlays. J Prosthet Dent. 1991. 66:187–192.
Article
20. el-Badrawy WA, el-Mowafy OM. Chemical versus dual curing of resin inlay cements. J Prosthet Dent. 1995. 73:515–524.
Article
21. Blackman R, Barghi N, Duke E. Influence of ceramic thickness on the polymerization of light-cured resin cement. J Prosthet Dent. 1990. 63:295–300.
Article
22. Kato H, Matsumura H, Atsuta M. Effect of etching and sandblasting on bond strength to sintered porcelain of unfilled resin. J Oral Rehabil. 2000. 27:103–110.
Article
23. Hahn P, Attin T, Grofke M, Hellwig E. Influence of resin cement viscosity on microleakage of ceramic inlays. Dent Mater. 2001. 17:191–196.
Article
24. Sano H, Ciucchi B, Mathews WG, Pashley DH. Tensile properties of mineralized and demineralized human and bovine dentin. J Dent Res. 1994. 73:1205–1211.
Article
25. Shono Y, Ogawa T, Terashita M, Carvalho RM, Pashley EL, Pashley DH. Regional measurement of resin-dentin bonding as an array. J Dent Res. 1999. 78:699–705.
Article
26. Suh BI, Feng L, Pashley DH, Tay FR. Factors contributing to the incompatibility between simplified-step adhesives and chemically-cured or dual-cured composites. Part III. Effect of acidic resin monomers. J Adhes Dent. 2003. 5:267–282.
27. Attal JP, Asmussen E, Degrange M. Effects of surface treatment on the free surface energy of dentin. Dent Mater. 1994. 10:259–264.
Article
28. Tay FR, Pashley DH. Aggressiveness of contemporary self-etching systems. I: Depth of penetration beyond dentin smear layers. Dent Mater. 2001. 17:296–308.
29. Sanares AM, Itthagarun A, King NM, Tay FR, Pashley DH. Adverse surface interactions between one-bottle light-cured adhesives and chemical-cured composites. Dent Mater. 2001. 17:542–556.
Article
30. Tay FR, Pashley DH. Water treeing-a potential mechanism for degradation of dentin adhesives. Am J Dent. 2003. 16:6–12.
31. Tay FR, Pashley DH, Yiu CK, Sanares AM, Wei SH. Factors contributing to the incompatibility between simplified-step adhesives and chemically-cured or dual-cured composites. Part I. Single-step self-etching adhesive. J Adhes Dent. 2003. 5:27–40.
32. Tay FR, Suh BI, Pashley DH, Prati C, Chuang SF, Li F. Factors contributing to the incompatibility between simplified-step adhesives and chemically-cured or dual-cured composites. Part II. Single-bottle, total-etch adhesive. J Adhes Dent. 2003. 5:91–105.
33. Tanaka J, Ishikawa K, Yatani H, Yamashita A, Suzuki K. Correlation of dentin bond durability with water asorption of bonding layer. Dent Mater J. 1999. 18:11–18.
Article