J Korean Acad Conserv Dent.  2005 Nov;30(6):493-504. 10.5395/JKACD.2005.30.6.493.

Compatibility of self-etching dentin adhesives with resin luting cements

• Kim DW
• Park SJ
• Choi KK

• KMID: 2175759
• DOI: http://doi.org/10.5395/JKACD.2005.30.6.493

Abstract

This study was performed to investigate the compatibility between 4 dentin adhesives and 4 resin luting cements. Dentin adhesives used in this study were All-Bond 2 (Bisco Inc., Schaumbrug, IL, USA), Clearfil SE-Bond (Kuraray Medical Inc, Osaka, Japan), Prompt L-Pop (3M Dental Products, St. Paul, MN, USA), One-Up Bond F (Tokuyama corp., Tokyo, Japan). Resin luting cements used in this study were Choice (Bisco Inc., Schaumbrug, IL, USA), Panavia F (Kuraray Medical Inc, Osaka, Japan), RelyX ARC (3M Dental Products, St. Paul, MN, USA), Bistite II DC (Tokuyama corp., Tokyo, Japan). Combination of each dentin adhesive and corresponding resin cement was made to 16 experimental groups. Flat dentin surfaces was created on mid-coronal dentin of extracted mandibular third molars, then dentin surface was polished with 320-grit silicon carbide abrasive papers. Indirect resin composite block (Tescera, Bisco) was fabricated. Its surface for bonding to tooth was polished with silicon carbide abrasive papers. Each dentin adhesive was treated on tooth surface and resin composite overlay were luted with each resin cement. Each bonded specimen was poured in epoxy resin and sectioned occluso-gingivally into 1.0 mm thick slab, then further sectioned into 1.0 x 1.0 mm2 composite-dentin beams. Microtensile bond strength was tested at a crosshead speed of 1.0 mm/min. The data were analysed by one-way ANOVA and Duncan's multiple comparison tests. The results of this study were as follows; 2-step self-etching dentin adhesive which has additional bonding resin is more compatible than 1-step self-etching dentin adhesive.

Keyword

Compatibility; Self-etching dentin adhesives; Resin luting cements; Microtensile bond strength; Indirect resin composite block; Dentin

MeSH Terms

Adhesives*
Dentin*
Molar, Third
Resin Cements
Tooth
Adhesives
Resin Cements

Figure

• 

  Figure 1 Schematic representation of micro-tensile bond strength test.

• 

  Figure 2 Micro-tensile bond strengths with CH resin cement.

• 

  Figure 3 Micro-tensile bond strengths with PA resin cement.

• 

  Figure 4 Micro-tensile bond strengths with RE resin cement.

• 

  Figure 5 Micro-tensile bond strengths with BI resin cement.

• 

  Figure 6 Micro-tensile bond strengths of each dentin adhesive coupled with four resin cements.

• 

  Figure 7 SEM photograph of the adhesive interface of CH-AB. Hybrid layer is well formed and resin tags are infiltrated into dentinal tubules deeply.

• 

  Figure 8 SEM photograph of the adhesive interface of BI-AB. Hybrid layer is well formed and resin tags are infiltrated into dentinal tubules deeply.

• 

  Figure 9 SEM photograph of the adhesive interface of PA-SE. Hybrid layer is well formed and resin tags are infiltrated into dentinal tubules deeply.

• 

  Figure 10 SEM photograph of the adhesive interface of RE-SE. Hybrid layer is well formed and resin tags are infiltrated into dentinal tubules deeply.

• 

  Figure 11 SEM photograph of the adhesive interface of PA-PL. Hybrid layer is relatively thin, resin tags are rare and short.

• 

  Figure 12 SEM photograph of the adhesive interface of RE-PL. Hybrid layer is formed limitedly and resin tags are rare.

• 

  Figure 13 SEM photograph of the adhesive interface of CH-OU. Resin tags are poorly formed.

• 

  Figure 14 SEM photograph of the adhesive interface of BI-OU. Few resin tags are observed.

Reference

1. Manhart J, Scheibenhogen FA, Chen HY, Hiekel R. A 2-year clinical study of composite and ceramic inlays. Clin Oral Investig. 2000. 4:192–198.

2. Peumans M, Van Meerbeek B, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G. Porcelain Veneers; a review of the literature. J Dent. 2000. 28:163–177.

3. Mitchell CA, Abbariki M, Orr JF. The influence of luting cement on the probabilities of survival and modes of failure of cast full-coveraged crowns. Dent Mater. 2000. 16:198–206.

4. Knox J, Kralj B, Hubsch PF, Middleton J, Jones ML. An evaluation of the influence of orthodontic adhesive on the stresses generated in a bonded bracket finite element model. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2001. 119:43–53.

5. el-Mowafy O, Rubo MH. Retention of a posterior resin-bonded fixed partial denture with a modified design : an in vitro study. Int J Prosthodont. 2000. 13:425–431.

6. Platt JA. Resin cements into the 21st century. Compend Contin Educ Dent. 1999. 20:1173–1184.

7. Diaz-Arnold AM, Vargas MA, Haselton DR. Current status of luting agents for fixed prosthodontics. J Prosthet Dent. 1999. 81:135–141.

8. Lopes GC, Baratieri LN, de Andrada MA, Vieira LC. Dental adhesion: present state of the art and future perspectives. Quintessence Int. 2002. 33:213–224.

9. Choi KK, Kim SW, Choi HY. Effect of filler addition to bonding agents on the physical properties and the bond strength to bovine teeth. The First International Congress on Adhesive Dentistry(IAD, Program and Abstracts). 2002. –434.

10. Carvalho RM, Pegoraro TA, Tay FR, Pegoraro LF, Pashley DH. Adhesive permeability affects coupling of resin cements that utilise self-etching primers to dentine. J Dent. 2004. 32:55–65.

11. Kugel G, Ferrari M. The science of bonding: from first to sixth generation. J Am Dent Assoc. 2000. 131:Suppl. 20S–25S.

12. Tanumiharja M, Burrow MF, Tyas MJ. Microntensile bond strengths of seven dentin adhesive systems. Dent Mater. 2000. 16:180–187.

13. Prati C, Chersoni S, Mongiorgi R, Pashley DH. Resin-infiltrated dentin layer formation of new bonding systems. Oper Dent. 1998. 23:185–194.

14. Tay FR, Sano H, Carvalho RM, Pashley EL, Pashley DH. An ultra-structural study of the influence of acidity of self-etching primers and smear layers thickness on bonding to intact dentin. J Adhes Dent. 2000. 2:83–98.

15. Tay FR, King NM, Suh BI, Pashley DH. Effect of delayed activation of light-cured resin composites on bonding of all-in-one adhesives. J Adhes Dent. 2001. 3:207–225.

16. Tay FR, Pashley DH, Suh BI, Carvalho RM, Itthagarun A. Single-step adhesives are permeable membranes. J Dent. 2002. 30:371–382.

17. Cheong C, King NM, Pashley DH, Ferrari M, Toledano M, Tay FR. Incompatibility of self-etch adhesives with chemical/dual-cured composites: two-step vs one-step systems. Oper Dent. 2003. 28:747–755.

18. Krämer N, Lohbauer U, Frankenberger R. Adhesive luting of indirect restorations. Am J Dent. 2000. 13:60D–76D.

19. Hasegawa EA, Boyer DB, Chan DC. Hardening of dual-cured cements under composite resin inlays. J Prosthet Dent. 1991. 66:187–192.

20. el-Badrawy WA, el-Mowafy OM. Chemical versus dual curing of resin inlay cements. J Prosthet Dent. 1995. 73:515–524.

21. Blackman R, Barghi N, Duke E. Influence of ceramic thickness on the polymerization of light-cured resin cement. J Prosthet Dent. 1990. 63:295–300.

22. Kato H, Matsumura H, Atsuta M. Effect of etching and sandblasting on bond strength to sintered porcelain of unfilled resin. J Oral Rehabil. 2000. 27:103–110.

23. Hahn P, Attin T, Grofke M, Hellwig E. Influence of resin cement viscosity on microleakage of ceramic inlays. Dent Mater. 2001. 17:191–196.

24. Sano H, Ciucchi B, Mathews WG, Pashley DH. Tensile properties of mineralized and demineralized human and bovine dentin. J Dent Res. 1994. 73:1205–1211.

25. Shono Y, Ogawa T, Terashita M, Carvalho RM, Pashley EL, Pashley DH. Regional measurement of resin-dentin bonding as an array. J Dent Res. 1999. 78:699–705.

26. Suh BI, Feng L, Pashley DH, Tay FR. Factors contributing to the incompatibility between simplified-step adhesives and chemically-cured or dual-cured composites. Part III. Effect of acidic resin monomers. J Adhes Dent. 2003. 5:267–282.

27. Attal JP, Asmussen E, Degrange M. Effects of surface treatment on the free surface energy of dentin. Dent Mater. 1994. 10:259–264.

28. Tay FR, Pashley DH. Aggressiveness of contemporary self-etching systems. I: Depth of penetration beyond dentin smear layers. Dent Mater. 2001. 17:296–308.

29. Sanares AM, Itthagarun A, King NM, Tay FR, Pashley DH. Adverse surface interactions between one-bottle light-cured adhesives and chemical-cured composites. Dent Mater. 2001. 17:542–556.

30. Tay FR, Pashley DH. Water treeing-a potential mechanism for degradation of dentin adhesives. Am J Dent. 2003. 16:6–12.

31. Tay FR, Pashley DH, Yiu CK, Sanares AM, Wei SH. Factors contributing to the incompatibility between simplified-step adhesives and chemically-cured or dual-cured composites. Part I. Single-step self-etching adhesive. J Adhes Dent. 2003. 5:27–40.

32. Tay FR, Suh BI, Pashley DH, Prati C, Chuang SF, Li F. Factors contributing to the incompatibility between simplified-step adhesives and chemically-cured or dual-cured composites. Part II. Single-bottle, total-etch adhesive. J Adhes Dent. 2003. 5:91–105.

33. Tanaka J, Ishikawa K, Yatani H, Yamashita A, Suzuki K. Correlation of dentin bond durability with water asorption of bonding layer. Dent Mater J. 1999. 18:11–18.