J Korean Acad Conserv Dent.  2004 Nov;29(6):489-497. 10.5395/JKACD.2004.29.6.489.

Rheological characterization of composites using a vertical oscillation rheometer

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Conservative Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Seoul National University, Korea. inboglee@snu.ac.kr

Abstract


OBJECTIVE
The purpose of this study was to investigate the viscoelastic properties related to handling characteristics of composite resins.
METHODS
A custom designed vertical oscillation rheometer (VOR) was used for rheological measurements of composites. The VOR consists of three parts: (1) a measuring unit, (2) a deformation induction unit and (3) a force detecting unit. Two medium viscous composites, Z100 and Z250 and two packable composites, P60 and SureFil were tested. The viscoelastic material function, including complex modulus E* and phase angle delta, were measured. A dynamic oscillatory test was used to evaluate the storage modulus (E'), loss modulus (E") and loss tangent (tandelta) of the composites as a function of frequency (omega) from 0.1 to 20 Hz at 23degrees C.
RESULTS
The E' and E" increased with increasing frequency and showed differences in magnitude between brands. The E*s of composites at omega = 2 Hz, normalized to that of Z100, were 2.16 (Z250), 4.80 (P60) and 25.21 (SureFil). The magnitudes and patterns of the change of tandelta of composites with increasing frequency were significantly different between brands. The relationships between the complex modulus E*, the phase angle delta and the frequency omega were represented by frequency domain phasor form, E* (omega) = E*e(idelta) = E* 45 degree angle delta.
CONCLUSIONS
The viscoelasticity of composites that influences handling characteristics is significant different between brands. The VOR is a relatively simple device for dynamic, mechanical analysis of high viscous dental composites. The locus of frequency domain phasor plots in a complex plane is a valuable method of representing the viscoelastic properties of composites.

Keyword

VOR; Viscoelasticity; Composite; Complex modulus; Frequency domain phasor plot

MeSH Terms

Composite Resins
Composite Resins

Figure

  • Figure 1-a Diagram of the VOR (vertical oscillatory rheometer)

  • Figure 1-b The geometry of measuring unit

  • Figure 2 The relationship between strain ε(t), stress σ(t) and phase angle δ in dynamic oscillatory test

  • Figure 3 The relationship between storage (real) modulus E', loss modulus (imaginary) modulus E", complex modulus E* and phase angle δ in a complex plane

  • Figure 4 Storage modulus E' increased with increasing the frequency and showed differences in magnitude between brands

  • Figure 5 Loss modulus E" increased with increasing the frequency and showed differences in magnitude between brands

  • Figure 6 Complex modulus E* increased with increasing the frequency and showed differences in magnitude between brands

  • Figure 7 Phase angle δ of composite. The patterns of the change of δ of samples with increasing frequency showed the different characteristics of the composites between brands

  • Figure 8 Loss tangent as a function of frequency

  • Figure 9 Relative complex modulus of composites normalized to that of Z1 at ω = 2 Hz

  • Figure 10 Phasor presentation of E* and δ, E*eiδ= E*∠δ, of composites at ω = 2 Hz in a polar coordinate system

  • Figure 11 Locus of frequency domain phasor plots, G*(ω)eiδ = ∣ G*(ω) ∣ ∠δ of composites in a complex plane


Cited by  1 articles

Effect of instrument compliance on the polymerization shrinkage stress measurements of dental resin composites
Deog-Gyu Seo, Sun-Hong Min, In-Bog Lee
J Korean Acad Conserv Dent. 2009;34(2):145-153.    doi: 10.5395/JKACD.2009.34.2.145.


Reference

1. Craig RG, Powers JM. Restorative dental materials. 2002. 11th ed. Mosby co;91–98. 231–251.
2. Bayne SC, Thompson JY, Swift EJ, et al. A characterization of first-generation flowable composites. J Am Dent Assoc. 1998. 129:567–577.
Article
3. Leinfelder KF, Prasad A. A new condensable composite for the restoration of posterior teeth. Dent Today. 1998. 17(2):112–116.
4. Leinfelder KF, Radz GM, Nash RW. A report on a new condensable composite resin. Compendium. 1998. 19(3):230–237.
5. Opdam NJM, Roeters JJM, Peters TCRB, et al. Consistency of resin composites for posterior use. Dent Mater. 1996. 12:350–354.
Article
6. Ferracane JL, Moser JB, Greener EH. Rheology of composite restoratives. J Dent Res. 1981. 60(9):1678–1685.
Article
7. Tyas MJ, Jones DW, Rizkalla AS. The evaluation of resin composite consistency. Dent Mater. 1998. 14:424–428.
Article
8. Al-sharaa KA, Watts DC. Stickiness prior to setting of some light cured resin composites. Dent Mater. 2003. 19:182–187.
9. Willems G, Lambrechts P, Braaem M, et al. A classification of dental composites according to their morphological and mechanical characteristics. Dent Mater. 1992. 8:310–319.
Article
10. Duran RL, Powers JM, Craig RG. Viscoelastic and dynamic properties of soft liners and tissue conditioners. J Dent Res. 1979. 58(8):1801–1807.
Article
11. Goldberg AJ. Viscoelastic properties of silicon, polysulfide, and polyether impression materials. J Dent Res. 1974. 53(5):1033–1039.
Article
12. Watts DC. Elastic moduli and visco-elastic relaxation. J Dent. 1994. 22:154–158.
Article
13. McCabe JF, Bowman AJ. The rheological properties of dental impression materials. Brit dent J. 1981. 151:179.
Article
14. Jacobsen PH, Whiting R, Richardson PCA. Viscosity of setting anterior restorative materials. Brit dent J. 1977. 143:393.
Article
15. Braden M. Viscosity and consistency of impression rubbers. J Dent Res. 1967. 46(2):429–433.
Article
16. Barnes HA, Hutton JF, Walters K. An introduction to rheology. 1989. Elsevier Science Publishing co.
17. Moon TJ. Rheology. 1988. 1st ed. Minumsa;7–80. 190–195.
18. Kim SY. Polymer physics. 1994. 2nd ed. Seoul University Press;7–26.
19. Lee IB, Son HH, Um CM. Rheological Properties of flowable, conventional hybrid, and condensable composite resins. Dent Mater. 2003. 19:298–307.
Article
20. Kim JW, Cho MS, Choi HJ, et al. Electrorheological fluid characterization via a vertical oscollation rheometer. Polym Test. 2001. 20:913–918.
Article
21. Cho MS, Choi YJ, Choi SG, et al. Viscoelasticity of an electrorheological fluid using a vertical oscillation rheometer. J Mol Liq. 1998. 75:13–24.
Article
22. Hyeon JC, et al. Theories and Applications of Rheology. 2001. 1st ed. The Korean Society of Rheology;237–239.
Full Text Links
  • JKACD
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr