J Gynecol Oncol.  2009 Sep;20(3):135-136. 10.3802/jgo.2009.20.3.135.

International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) staging system revised: what should be considered critically for gynecologic cancer?

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea. yssong@snu.ac.kr
  • 2Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
  • 3Major in Biomodulation, World Class University, Seoul, Korea.

Abstract

No abstract available.


MeSH Terms

Gynecology
Obstetrics

Cited by  1 articles

FIGO Staging for Uterine Sarcomas: Can the Revised 2008 Staging System Predict Survival Outcome Better?
Ga Won Yim, Eun Ji Nam, Sang Wun Kim, Young Tae Kim
Yonsei Med J. 2014;55(3):563-569.    doi: 10.3349/ymj.2014.55.3.563.


Reference

1. Odicino F, Pecorelli S, Zigliani L, Creasman WT. History of the FIGO cancer staging system. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2008. 101:205–210.
2. Pecorelli S. Revised FIGO staging for carcinoma of the vulva, cervix, and endometrium. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2009. 105:103–104.
3. Prat J. FIGO staging for uterine sarcomas. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2009. 104:177–178.
4. Pecorelli S, Zigliani L, Odicino F. Revised FIGO staging for carcinoma of the cervix. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2009. 105:107–108.
5. Creasman W. Revised FIGO staging for carcinoma of the endometrium. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2009. 105:109.
6. Hacker NF. Revised FIGO staging for carcinoma of the vulva. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2009. 105:105–106.
7. Petru E, Luck HJ, Stuart G, Gaffney D, Millan D, Vergote I. Gynecologic Cancer Intergroup (GCIG) proposals for changes of the current FIGO staging system. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2009. 143:69–74.
Full Text Links
  • JGO
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr