Ann Surg Treat Res.  2016 Feb;90(2):95-100. 10.4174/astr.2016.90.2.95.

A new risk-scoring model for predicting 30-day mortality after repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms in the era of endovascular procedures

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Trauma and Vascular Surgery, The Catholic University of Korea, Uijeongbu St. Mary's Hospital, Uijeongbu, Korea.
  • 2Biostatistics Collaboration Unit, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
  • 3Department of Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea. ypcho@amc.seoul.kr
  • 4Department of Radiology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.

Abstract

PURPOSE
To propose a new, multivariable risk-scoring model for predicting 30-day mortality in individuals underwent repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA).
METHODS
Four hundred eighty-five consecutive patients who underwent AAA repair from January 2000 to December 2010 were included in the study. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to evaluate the risk factors, and a risk-scoring model was developed.
RESULTS
Multivariate analysis identified three independent preoperative risk factors associated with mortality, and a risk-scoring model was created by assigning an equal value to each factor. The independent predictors were location of the AAA, rupture of AAA, and preoperative pulmonary dysfunction. The multivariable regression model demonstrated moderate discrimination (c statistic, 0.811) and calibration (Hosmer-Lemeshow test, P = 0.793). The observed mortality rate did not differ significantly from that predicted by our risk-scoring model.
CONCLUSION
Our risk-scoring model has excellent ability to predict 30-day mortality after AAA repair, and awaits validation in further studies.

Keyword

Abdominal aortic aneurysm; Operative surgical procedures; Risk; Treatment outcome

MeSH Terms

Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal*
Calibration
Discrimination (Psychology)
Endovascular Procedures*
Humans
Mortality*
Multivariate Analysis
Risk Factors
Rupture
Surgical Procedures, Operative
Treatment Outcome

Reference

1. Henebiens M, Vahl A, Koelemay MJ. Elective surgery of abdominal aortic aneurysms in octogenarians: a systematic review. J Vasc Surg. 2008; 47:676–681.
2. Wilmink TB, Quick CR, Hubbard CS, Day NE. The influence of screening on the incidence of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms. J Vasc Surg. 1999; 30:203–208.
3. Grant SW, Grayson AD, Purkayastha D, Wilson SD, McCollum C. participants in the Vascular Governance North West Programme. Logistic risk model for mortality following elective abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. Br J Surg. 2011; 98:652–658.
4. Roques F, Michel P, Goldstone AR, Nashef SA. The logistic EuroSCORE. Eur Heart J. 2003; 24:881–882.
5. Robinson WP, Schanzer A, Li Y, Goodney PP, Nolan BW, Eslami MH, et al. Derivation and validation of a practical risk score for prediction of mortality after open repair of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms in a US regional cohort and comparison to existing scoring systems. J Vasc Surg. 2013; 57:354–361.
6. Samy AK, Murray G, MacBain G. Glasgow aneurysm score. Cardiovasc Surg. 1994; 2:41–44.
7. Patterson BO, Karthikesalingam A, Hinchliffe RJ, Loftus IM, Thompson MM, Holt PJ. The Glasgow Aneurysm Score does not predict mortality after open abdominal aortic aneurysm in the era of endovascular aneurysm repair. J Vasc Surg. 2011; 54:353–357.
8. Baas AF, Janssen KJ, Prinssen M, Buskens E, Blankensteijn JD. The Glasgow Aneurysm Score as a tool to predict 30-day and 2-year mortality in the patients from the Dutch Randomized Endovascular Aneurysm Management trial. J Vasc Surg. 2008; 47:277–281.
9. Ramanan B, Gupta PK, Sundaram A, Gupta H, Johanning JM, Lynch TG, et al. Development of a risk index for prediction of mortality after open aortic aneurysm repair. J Vasc Surg. 2013; 58:871–878.
10. Sullivan LM, Massaro JM, D'Agostino RB Sr. Presentation of multivariate data for clinical use: The Framingham Study risk score functions. Stat Med. 2004; 23:1631–1660.
11. Moulakakis KG, Dalainas I, Mylonas S, Giannakopoulos TG, Avgerinos ED, Liapis CD. Conversion to open repair after endografting for abdominal aortic aneurysm: a review of causes, incidence, results, and surgical techniques of reconstruction. J Endovasc Ther. 2010; 17:694–702.
12. Ferrero E, Ferri M, Viazzo A, Pecchio A, Berardi G, Piazza S, et al. Open conversion after endovascular aortic aneurysm repair: a single-center experience. Ann Vasc Surg. 2013; 27:856–864.
13. Hobo R, Buth J. EUROSTAR collaborators. Secondary interventions following endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair using current endografts. A EUROSTAR report. J Vasc Surg. 2006; 43:896–902.
14. Ouriel K, Clair DG, Greenberg RK, Lyden SP, O'Hara PJ, Sarac TP, et al. Endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms: device-specific outcome. J Vasc Surg. 2003; 37:991–998.
15. Sampram ES, Karafa MT, Mascha EJ, Clair DG, Greenberg RK, Lyden SP, et al. Nature, frequency, and predictors of secondary procedures after endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm. J Vasc Surg. 2003; 37:930–937.
16. Prance SE, Wilson YG, Cosgrove CM, Walker AJ, Wilkins DC, Ashley S. Ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms: selecting patients for surgery. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 1999; 17:129–132.
17. Neary WD, Crow P, Foy C, Prytherch D, Heather BP, Earnshaw JJ. Comparison of POSSUM scoring and the Hardman Index in selection of patients for repair of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm. Br J Surg. 2003; 90:421–425.
18. Boyle JR, Gibbs PJ, King D, Shearman CP, Raptis S, Phillips MJ. Predicting outcome in ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm: a prospective study of 100 consecutive cases. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2003; 26:607–611.
19. Tambyraja AL, Fraser SC, Murie JA, Chalmers RT. Validity of the Glasgow Aneurysm Score and the Hardman Index in predicting outcome after ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. Br J Surg. 2005; 92:570–573.
20. Copeland GP, Jones D, Walters M. POSSUM: a scoring system for surgical audit. Br J Surg. 1991; 78:355–360.
21. Prytherch DR, Ridler BM, Beard JD, Earnshaw JJ. Audit and Research Committee, The Vascular Surgical Society of Great Britian and Ireland. A model for national outcome audit in vascular surgery. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2001; 21:477–483.
22. Steyerberg EW, Kievit J, de Mol Van Otterloo JC, van Bockel JH, Eijkemans MJ, Habbema JD. Perioperative mortality of elective abdominal aortic aneurysm surgery. A clinical prediction rule based on literature and individual patient data. Arch Intern Med. 1995; 155:1998–2004.
23. Brady AR, Fowkes FG, Greenhalgh RM, Powell JT, Ruckley CV, Thompson SG. Risk factors for postoperative death following elective surgical repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm: results from the UK Small Aneurysm Trial. On behalf of the UK Small Aneurysm Trial participants. Br J Surg. 2000; 87:742–749.
24. Kertai MD, Steyerberg EW, Boersma E, Bax JJ, Vergouwe Y, van Urk H, et al. Validation of two risk models for perioperative mortality in patients undergoing elective abdominal aortic aneurysm surgery. Vasc Endovascular Surg. 2003; 37:13–21.
25. Baek JK, Kwon H, Ko GY, Kim MJ, Han Y, Chung YS, et al. Impact of graft composition on the systemic inflammatory response after an elective repair of an abdominal aortic aneurysm. Ann Surg Treat Res. 2015; 88:21–27.
Full Text Links
  • ASTR
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr