Anesth Pain Med.  2019 Jul;14(3):305-315. 10.17085/apm.2019.14.3.305.

Risk factors of 30-day mortality following endovascular thoracic and abdominal aortic repair with general anesthesia

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Inje University Sanggye Paik Hospital, Seoul, Korea. twowind@paik.ac.kr

Abstract

BACKGROUND
Recently, endovascular aortic repair (EVAR) and thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR), have been used for treatment of thoracic and abdominal aortic aneurysms. The purpose of this study was to analyze the outcome and predictors for 30-day mortality and complications, in patients that underwent EVAR and/or TEVAR under general anesthesia.
METHODS
In this study, 151 cases of EVAR and/or TEVAR under general anesthesia in 140 patients during 2009-2017 were studied. The primary outcome was 30-day mortality after surgery. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used, to clarify risk for postoperative 30-day mortality.
RESULTS
Postoperative 30-day mortality rate was 9.9% in the study population (10.3% in EVAR, and 9.3% in TEVAR, respectively). Seventy-two cases (47.7%) experienced postoperative complications within 30 days. Elderly older than age 76.5 (odds ratio [ORs] = 48.89, 95% confidential interval [95% CI] 1.40-1,710.25, P = 0.032), technically expertness (OR = 0.01, 95% CI 0.00-0.40, P = 0.013), severity of systemic complications (OR = 23.24, 95% CI, 2.27-238.24, P = 0.008), and severity of local-vascular complications (OR = 31.87, 95% CI, 1.29-784.66, P = 0.034) were significantly associated with 30-day mortality.
CONCLUSIONS
This study revealed that elderly, technically expertness, and severity of systemic and local-vascular complications were associated with 30-day mortality of EVAR and TEVAR in aortic aneurysm.

Keyword

Aortic aneurysm; Length of stay; Mortality; Risk factors; Treatment outcome

MeSH Terms

Aged
Anesthesia, General*
Aortic Aneurysm
Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal
Humans
Length of Stay
Logistic Models
Mortality*
Postoperative Complications
Risk Factors*
Treatment Outcome

Reference

1. Acosta S, Ogren M, Bengtsson H, Bergqvist D, Lindblad B, Zdanowski Z. Increasing incidence of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm:a population-based study. J Vasc Surg. 2006; 44:237–43. DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2006.04.037. PMID: 16890847.
2. Parodi JC, Palmaz JC, Barone HD. Transfemoral intraluminal graft implantation for abdominal aortic aneurysms. Ann Vasc Surg. 1991; 5:491–9. DOI: 10.1007/BF02015271. PMID: 1837729.
3. Greenhalgh RM, Brown LC, Kwong GP, Powell JT, Thompson SG. EVAR trial participants. Comparison of endovascular aneurysm repair with open repair in patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm (EVAR trial 1), 30-day operative mortality results: randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2004; 364:843–8. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(04)16979-1. PMID: 15351191.
4. Prinssen M, Verhoeven ELG, Buth J. A randomized trial comparing conventional and endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms. ACC Curr J Rev. 2005; 14:59–60. DOI: 10.1016/j.accreview.2004.12.016.
5. Lederle FA, Freischlag JA, Kyriakides TC, Padberg FT Jr, Matsumura JS, Kohler TR, et al. Outcomes following endovascular vs open repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm:a randomized trial. JAMA. 2009; 302:1535–42. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2009.1426. PMID: 19826022.
6. Chaikof EL, Mutrie C, Kasirajan K, Milner R, Chen EP, Veeraswamy RK, et al. Endovascular repair for diverse pathologies of the thoracic aorta:an initial decade of experience. J Am Coll Surg. 2009; 208:802–16. DOI: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2008.12.021. PMID: 19476841.
7. EVAR trial participants. Endovascular aneurysm repair versus open repair in patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm (EVAR trial 1):randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2005; 365:2179–86. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)66627-5. PMID: 15978925.
8. EVAR trial participants. Endovascular aneurysm repair and outcome in patients unfit for open repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm (EVAR trial 2):randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2005; 365:2187–92. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)66628-7. PMID: 15978926.
9. Resch T, Malina M, Lindblad B, Dias NV, Sonesson B, Ivancev K. Endovascular repair of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms:logistics and short-term results. J Endovasc Ther. 2003; 10:440–6. DOI: 10.1177/152660280301000307. PMID: 12932153.
10. Acosta S, Lindblad B, Zdanowski Z. Predictors for outcome after open and endovascular repair of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2007; 33:277–84. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2006.09.017. PMID: 17097899.
11. Coselli JS, LeMaire SA, Miller CC 3rd, Schmittling ZC, Köksoy C, Pagan J, et al. Mortality and paraplegia after thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm repair:a risk factor analysis. Ann Thorac Surg. 2000; 69:409–14. DOI: 10.1016/S0003-4975(99)01478-2. PMID: 10735672.
12. Giles KA, Schermerhorn ML, O'Malley AJ, Cotterill P, Jhaveri A, Pomposelli FB, et al. Risk prediction for perioperative mortality of endovascular vs open repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms using the Medicare population. J Vasc Surg. 2009; 50:256–62. DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2009.01.044. PMID: 19249184. PMCID: PMC2785461.
13. Schermerhorn ML, O'Malley AJ, Jhaveri A, Cotterill P, Pomposelli F, Landon BE. Endovascular vs. open repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms in the Medicare population. N Engl J Med. 2008; 358:464–74. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa0707348. PMID: 18234751.
14. Ruppert V, Leurs LJ, Steckmeier B, Buth J, Umscheid T. Influence of anesthesia type on outcome after endovascular aortic aneurysm repair:an analysis based on EUROSTAR data. J Vasc Surg. 2006; 44:16–21. DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2006.03.039. PMID: 16828420.
15. Broos PP, Stokmans RA, Cuypers PW, van Sambeek MR, Teijink JA. Effects of anesthesia type on perioperative outcome after endovascular aneurysm repair. J Endovasc Ther. 2015; 22:770–7. DOI: 10.1177/1526602815601387. PMID: 26276553.
16. Karthikesalingam A, Thrumurthy SG, Young EL, Hinchliffe RJ, Holt PJ, Thompson MM. Locoregional anesthesia for endovascular aneurysm repair. J Vasc Surg. 2012; 56:510–9. DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2012.02.047. PMID: 22727842.
17. Parra JR, Crabtree T, McLafferty RB, Ayerdi J, Gruneiro LA, Ramsey DE, et al. Anesthesia technique and outcomes of endovascular aneurysm repair. Ann Vasc Surg. 2005; 19:123–9. DOI: 10.1007/s10016-004-0138-y. PMID: 15714381.
18. Rutherford RB, Baker JD, Ernst C, Johnston KW, Porter JM, Ahn S, et al. Recommended standards for reports dealing with lower extremity ischemia:revised version. J Vasc Surg. 1997; 26:517–38. DOI: 10.1016/S0741-5214(97)70045-4. PMID: 9308598.
19. Chaikof EL, Blankensteijn JD, Harris PL, White GH, Zarins CK, Bernhard VM, et al. Reporting standards for endovascular aortic aneurysm repair. J Vasc Surg. 2002; 35:1048–60. DOI: 10.1067/mva.2002.123763. PMID: 12021727.
20. Mehta M, Taggert J, Darling RC 3rd, Chang BB, Kreienberg PB, Paty PS, et al. Establishing a protocol for endovascular treatment of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms:outcomes of a prospective analysis. J Vasc Surg. 2006; 44:1–8. DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2006.02.057. PMID: 16828417.
21. Vaddineni SK, Russo GC, Patterson MA, Taylor SM, Jordan WD Jr. Ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm:a retrospective assessment of open versus endovascular repair. Ann Vasc Surg. 2005; 19:782–6. DOI: 10.1007/s10016-005-7975-1. PMID: 16228806.
22. Steuer J, Eriksson MO, Nyman R, Björck M, Wanhainen A. Early and long-term outcome after thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) for acute complicated type B aortic dissection. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2011; 41:318–23. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2010.11.024. PMID: 21194985.
23. Eggebrecht H, Nienaber CA, Neuhäuser M, Baumgart D, Kische S, Schmermund A, et al. Endovascular stent-graft placement in aortic dissection:a meta-analysis. Eur Heart J. 2006; 27:489–98. DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehi493. PMID: 16227309.
24. Peppelenbosch N, Buth J, Harris PL, van Marrewijk C, Fransen G. EUROSTAR Collaborators. Diameter of abdominal aortic aneurysm and outcome of endovascular aneurysm repair:does size matter?A report from EUROSTAR. J Vasc Surg. 2004; 39:288–97. DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2003.09.047. PMID: 14743127.
25. Gloviczki P, Huang Y, Oderich GS, Duncan AA, Kalra M, Fleming MD, et al. Clinical presentation, comorbidities, and age but not female gender predict survival after endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm. J Vasc Surg. 2015; 61:853–61.e2. DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2014.12.004. PMID: 25595402.
26. Laheij RJ, van Marrewijk CJ, Buth J, Harris PL. EUROSTAR Collaborators. The influence of team experience on outcomes of endovascular stenting of abdominal aortic aneurysms. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2002; 24:128–33. DOI: 10.1053/ejvs.2002.1670. PMID: 12389234.
27. Salata K, Katznelson R, Beattie WS, Carroll J, Lindsay TF, Djaiani G. Endovascular versus open approach to aortic aneurysm repair surgery:rates of postoperative delirium. Can J Anaesth. 2012; 59:556–61. DOI: 10.1007/s12630-012-9695-7. PMID: 22441728.
28. Koebrugge B, van Wensen RJ, Bosscha K, Dautzenberg PL, Koning OH. Delirium after emergency/elective open and endovascular aortoiliac surgery at a surgical ward with a high-standard delirium care protocol. Vascular. 2010; 18:279–87. DOI: 10.2310/6670.2010.00052. PMID: 20822723.
Full Text Links
  • APM
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr