Cancer Res Treat.  2006 Dec;38(4):214-217.

An Evaluation of Nutrition Support for Terminal Cancer Patients at Teaching Hospitals in Korea

• Kim DY
• Lee SM
• Lee KE
• Lee HR
• Kim JH
• Lee KW
• Lee JS
• Lee SN

Abstract

PURPOSE
We wanted to analyze the use of nutrition support for terminal cancer patients, the effect of discussing withdrawal of nutrition support and do-not- resuscitate (DNR) consent on the use of intravenous nutrition during the patient's last week of life and at the time of death.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
The study involved 362 patients with terminal cancer from four teaching hospitals, and they all died between January 1 2003 and December 31 2005. The basic demographic data, the use of intravenous nutrition during the patient's last week of life and at death, discussion of terminal nutrition withdrawal and DNR consent were evaluated.
RESULTS
In the week before death, the patients received artificial nutrition such as total parenteral nutrition (31%), intravenous albumin infusion (25%), and feeding tube placements (9%). A discussion concerning withdrawal of nutrition support was limited to 25 (7%) patients. DNR consent was obtained from 294 (81%) patients. None of the patients were directly involved in any of these decisions. The discussion about withdrawal of terminal nutrition and DNR consent with the patient's surrogates did not have any effect on reducing the use of parenteral nutrition.
CONCLUSION
The majority of patients dying of terminal cancer were still given potentially futile nutritional support. Modern clinical guidelines and ethical education about nutritional support at the end of life care is urgently needed in Korean medical practice to provide proper administration of terminal nutrition for end of life care.

Keyword

Nutritional support; Terminal cancer patients

MeSH Terms

Education
Hospitals, Teaching*
Humans
Korea*
Nutritional Support
Parenteral Nutrition
Parenteral Nutrition, Total
Terminal Care

Reference

1. Inui A. Cancer anorexia-cachexia syndrome: current issues in research and management. CA Cancer J Clin. 2002; 52:72–91. PMID: 11929007.

2. Koretz RL. Parenteral nutrition: is it oncologically logical? J Clin Oncol. 1984; 2:534–538. PMID: 6427418.

3. Klein S, Koretz RL. Nutritional support in patients with cancer: what do the data really show? Nutr Clin Pract. 1994; 9:91–100. PMID: 8078449.

4. McKinlay AW. Nutritional support in patients with advanced cancer: permission to fall out? Proc Nutr Soc. 2004; 63:431–435. PMID: 15373954.

5. Barrera R. Nutritional support in cancer patients. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2002; 26(5):Supple. S63–S71. PMID: 12216725.

6. Chiu TY, Hu WY, Chuang RB, Chen CY. Nutrition and hydration for terminal cancer patients in Taiwan. Support Care Cancer. 2002; 10:630–636. PMID: 12436222.

7. Dunlop RJ, Ellershaw JE, Baines MJ, Sykes N, Saunders CM. On withholding nutrition and hydration in the terminally ill: has palliative medicine gone too far? J Med Ethics. 1995; 21:141–143. PMID: 7545757.

8. Oh DY, Kim JH, Kim DW, Im SA, Kim TY, Heo DS, et al. CPR or DNR? End of life decision in Korean cancer patients: a single center's experience. Support Care Cancer. 2006; 14:103–108. PMID: 16151752.

9. Oh DY, Kim JE, Lee CH, Lim JS, Jung KH, Heo DS, et al. Discrepancies among patients, family members, and physicians in Korea in terms of values regarding the withholding of treatment from patients with terminal malignancies. Cancer. 2004; 100(9):1961–1966. PMID: 15112278.

10. Ditto PH, Danks JH, Smucker WD, Bookwala J, Copppola KM, Dresser R, et al. Advance directives as acts of communication: a randomized controlled trial. Arch Intern Med. 2001; 161:421–430. PMID: 11176768.

11. Friebert S, Kodish E. The right to decide. J Clin Oncol. 2002; 20:4115–4118. PMID: 12351609.

12. Gillick MR. The use of advance care planning to guide decisions about artificial nutrition and hydration. Nutr Clin Pract. 2006; 21:126–133. PMID: 16556922.