Ann Rehabil Med.  2014 Jun;38(3):347-352. 10.5535/arm.2014.38.3.347.

Differences in Urodynamic Variables for Vesicoureteral Reflux Depending on the Neurogenic Bladder Type

Affiliations
  • 1Division of Spinal Cord Medicine, Pusan National University School of Medicine, Yangsan, Korea. drkohy@gmail.com
  • 2Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Pusan National University School of Medicine, Yangsan, Korea.
  • 3Medical Research Institute, Pusan National University, Busan, Korea.
  • 4Research Institute for Convergence of Biomedical Science and Technology, Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital, Yangsan, Korea.

Abstract


OBJECTIVE
To compare the urodynamic study variables at the onset of vesicoureteral reflux (VUR) between the overactive and underactive bladders in patients with spinal cord injury who presented with VUR.
METHODS
A total of 28 (13 cases of detrusor overactivity and 15 detrusor underactivity) men were enrolled. We compared the urodynamic variables between the two groups; detrusor pressure and bladder compliance, the infused volume at the onset of VUR measured on a voiding cystourethrography and cystometric capacity, maximum detrusor pressure, and bladder compliance during filling cystometry were recorded.
RESULTS
At the onset of VUR, the bladder volume and compliance, except for the detrusor pressure, showed a significant difference between the two groups. The detrusor pressure, bladder volume, and bladder compliance relative to the cystometric capacity showed a significant difference between the two groups. The detrusor pressure, bladder volume, and bladder compliance at the onset of VUR relative to the cystometric bladder capacity did not show any significant difference between the two groups.
CONCLUSION
There were differences in some variables at the onset of VUR depending on the type of neurogenic bladder. The VUR occurred at a lower capacity in neurogenic bladder with detrusor overactivity than in neurogenic bladder with detrusor underactivity at the same pressure. VUR occurred at a lower intravesical pressure compared to that known as the critical detrusor pressure (> or =40 cm H2O) required for the development of VUR. The results of our study demonstrate that the detrusor pressure should be maintained lower than the well known effective critical detrusor pressure for the prevention and treatment of VUR.

Keyword

Neurogenic urinary bladder; Vesicoureteral reflux; Spinal cord injuries; Urodynamics

MeSH Terms

Compliance
Humans
Male
Spinal Cord Injuries
Urinary Bladder
Urinary Bladder, Neurogenic*
Urodynamics*
Vesico-Ureteral Reflux*

Reference

1. Talbot HS, Bunts RC. Late renal changes in paraplegia; hydronephrosis due to vesico-ureteral reflux. J Urol. 1949; 61:870–882. PMID: 18127376.
Article
2. Arant BS Jr. Vesicoureteric reflux and renal injury. Am J Kidney Dis. 1991; 17:491–511. PMID: 2024650.
Article
3. Madersbacher H. The various types of neurogenic bladder dysfunction: an update of current therapeutic concepts. Paraplegia. 1990; 28:217–229. PMID: 2235029.
Article
4. Madersbacher H, Wyndaele JJ, Igawa Y, Chancellor M, Chartier-Kastler E, Kovindha A. Conservative management in neuropathic urinary incontinence. In : Abrams P, Cardozo L, Khoury S, Wein A, editors. Incontinence: 2nd international consultation on incontinence. Plymouth: Health Publication Ltd.;2002. p. 697–754.
5. Lebowitz RL, Olbing H, Parkkulainen KV, Smellie JM, Tamminen-Mobius TE. International system of radiographic grading of vesicoureteric reflux: International Reflux Study in Children. Pediatr Radiol. 1985; 15:105–109. PMID: 3975102.
6. Abrams P, Cardozo L, Fall M, Griffiths D, Rosier P, Ulmsten U, et al. The standardisation of terminology of lower urinary tract function: report from the Standardisation Sub-committee of the International Continence Society. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2002; 187:116–126. PMID: 12114899.
Article
7. Ku JH, Choi WJ, Lee KY, Jung TY, Lee JK, Park WH, et al. Complications of the upper urinary tract in patients with spinal cord injury: a long-term follow-up study. Urol Res. 2005; 33:435–439. PMID: 16317536.
Article
8. Kaufman AM, Ritchey ML, Roberts AC, Rudy DC, McGuire EJ. Decreased bladder compliance in patients with myelomeningocele treated with radiological observation. J Urol. 1996; 156:2031–2033. PMID: 8965337.
Article
9. Gerridzen RG, Thijssen AM, Dehoux E. Risk factors for upper tract deterioration in chronic spinal cord injury patients. J Urol. 1992; 147:416–418. PMID: 1732606.
Article
10. McGuire EJ, Woodside JR, Borden TA, Weiss RM. Prognostic value of urodynamic testing in myelodysplastic patients. J Urol. 1981; 126:205–209. PMID: 7196460.
Article
11. Hackler RH, Hall MK, Zampieri TA. Bladder hypocompliance in the spinal cord injury population. J Urol. 1989; 141:1390–1393. PMID: 2724437.
Article
12. Wyndaele JJ. Urology in spinal cord injured patients. Paraplegia. 1987; 25:267–269. PMID: 3601439.
Article
13. Dmochowski R. Cystometry. Urol Clin North Am. 1996; 23:243–252. PMID: 8659024.
Article
14. Styles RA, Neal DE, Griffiths CJ, Ramsden PD. Long-term monitoring of bladder pressure in chronic retention of urine: the relationship between detrusor activity and upper tract dilatation. J Urol. 1988; 140:330–334. PMID: 3398130.
Article
15. Downey JA, Myers SJ, Gonzalez EG, Lieberman JS. The physiological basis of rehabilitation medicine. 2nd ed. Boston: Butterworth-Heinemann;1994.
16. Caione P, Villa M, Capozza N, De Gennaro M, Rizzoni G. Predictive risk factors for chronic renal failure in primary high-grade vesico-ureteric reflux. BJU Int. 2004; 93:1309–1312. PMID: 15180629.
Article
17. Soylu A, Demir BK, Turkmen M, Bekem O, Saygi M, Cakmakci H, et al. Predictors of renal scar in children with urinary infection and vesicoureteral reflux. Pediatr Nephrol. 2008; 23:2227–2232. PMID: 18612659.
Article
18. Lipsky H, Chisholm GD. Primary vesico-ureteric reflux in adults. Br J Urol. 1971; 43:277–283. PMID: 5556869.
Article
19. Bors E, Comarr AE. Vesico-ureteral reflux in paraplegic patients. J Urol. 1952; 68:691–698. PMID: 12991376.
Article
20. Suzuki T, Ushiyama T. Vesicoureteral reflux in the early stage of spinal cord injury: a retrospective study. Spinal Cord. 2001; 39:23–25. PMID: 11224010.
Article
Full Text Links
  • ARM
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr