Yonsei Med J.  2015 Sep;56(5):1235-1243. 10.3349/ymj.2015.56.5.1235.

Clinical and Angiographic Predictors of Microvascular Dysfunction in ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction

Affiliations
  • 1Division of Cardiology, Inha University Hospital, Incheon, Korea. siwoo@inha.ac.kr

Abstract

PURPOSE
We aimed to discover clinical and angiographic predictors of microvascular dysfunction using the index of microcirculatory resistance (IMR) in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI).
MATERIALS AND METHODS
We enrolled 113 patients with STEMI (age, 56+/-11 years; 95 men) who underwent primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). The IMR was measured with a pressure sensor/thermistor-tipped guidewire after primary PCI. The patients were divided into three groups based on IMR values: Low IMR [<18 U (12.9+/-2.6 U), n=38], Mid IMR [18-31 U (23.9+/-4.0 U), n=38], and High IMR [>31 U (48.1+/-17.1 U), n=37].
RESULTS
The age of the Low IMR group was significantly lower than that of the Mid and High IMR groups. The door-to-balloon time was <90 minutes in all patients, and it was not significantly different between groups. Meanwhile, the symptom-onset-to-balloon time was significantly longer in the High IMR group, compared to the Mid and Low IMR groups (p<0.001). In the high IMR group, the culprit lesion was found in a proximal location significantly more often than in a non-proximal location (p=0.008). In multivariate regression analysis, age and symptom-onset-to-balloon time were independent determinants of a high IMR (p=0.013 and p=0.003, respectively).
CONCLUSION
Our data suggest that age and symptom-onset-to-balloon time might be the major predictors of microvascular dysfunction in STEMI patients with a door-to-balloon time of <90 minutes.

Keyword

Microvascular dysfunction; ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction; index of microcirculatory resistance; doorto-balloon time; symptom-onset-to-balloon time

MeSH Terms

Aged
Angiography/*methods
Female
Humans
Male
Microcirculation
Middle Aged
Myocardial Infarction/physiopathology/*surgery
Operative Time
*Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
Regression Analysis

Figure

  • Fig. 1 Relations of age (A), CK peak (B), and symptom-onset-to-balloon time (C) to increasing IMR. Solid lines represent linear regression lines. IMR, index of microcirculatory resistance; CK, creatine kinase.

  • Fig. 2 Comparison of IMR according to clinical and angiographic factors. *The IMR of patients with symptom-onset-to-balloon time of >180 minutes was significantly higher than the IMR of those with a symptom-onset-to-balloon ≤180 minutes, †The IMR was significantly higher in proximal lesion than in non-proximal lesion, ‡The IMR was significantly higher in initial TIMI 0/1 group, as compared initial TIMI 2/3. IMR, index of microcirculatory resistance; LAD, left anterior descending artery; LCX, left circumflex artery; RCA, right coronary artery; P, proximal location of culprit artery; NP, non-proximal location of culprit artery; TIMI, thrombolysis in myocardial infarction.


Cited by  2 articles

Therapeutic Hypothermia for Cardioprotection in Acute Myocardial Infarction
In Sook Kang, Ikeno Fumiaki, Wook Bum Pyun
Yonsei Med J. 2016;57(2):291-297.    doi: 10.3349/ymj.2016.57.2.291.

Gender Differences in Factors Related to Prehospital Delay in Patients with ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction
Hee-Sook Kim, Kun-Sei Lee, Sang Jun Eun, Si-Wan Choi, Dae Hyeok Kim, Tae-Ho Park, Kyeong Ho Yun, Dong Heon Yang, Seok Jae Hwang, Ki-Soo Park, Rock Bum Kim
Yonsei Med J. 2017;58(4):710-719.    doi: 10.3349/ymj.2017.58.4.710.


Reference

1. Herrmann J, Kaski JC, Lerman A. Coronary microvascular dysfunction in the clinical setting: from mystery to reality. Eur Heart J. 2012; 33:2771–2782b.
Article
2. Fearon WF, Balsam LB, Farouque HM, Caffarelli AD, Robbins RC, Fitzgerald PJ, et al. Novel index for invasively assessing the coronary microcirculation. Circulation. 2003; 107:3129–3132.
Article
3. Leung DY, Leung M. Non-invasive/invasive imaging: significance and assessment of coronary microvascular dysfunction. Heart. 2011; 97:587–595.
Article
4. Niccoli G, Burzotta F, Galiuto L, Crea F. Myocardial no-reflow in humans. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009; 54:281–292.
Article
5. Gibson CM, Cannon CP, Murphy SA, Ryan KA, Mesley R, Marble SJ, et al. Relationship of TIMI myocardial perfusion grade to mortality after administration of thrombolytic drugs. Circulation. 2000; 101:125–130.
Article
6. Wu KC, Zerhouni EA, Judd RM, Lugo-Olivieri CH, Barouch LA, Schulman SP, et al. Prognostic significance of microvascular obstruction by magnetic resonance imaging in patients with acute myocardial infarction. Circulation. 1998; 97:765–772.
Article
7. Herzog BA, Husmann L, Valenta I, Gaemperli O, Siegrist PT, Tay FM, et al. Long-term prognostic value of 13N-ammonia myocardial perfusion positron emission tomography added value of coronary flow reserve. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009; 54:150–156.
Article
8. Fearon WF, Shah M, Ng M, Brinton T, Wilson A, Tremmel JA, et al. Predictive value of the index of microcirculatory resistance in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008; 51:560–565.
Article
9. McGeoch R, Watkins S, Berry C, Steedman T, Davie A, Byrne J, et al. The index of microcirculatory resistance measured acutely predicts the extent and severity of myocardial infarction in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2010; 3:715–722.
10. Yoo SH, Yoo TK, Lim HS, Kim MY, Koh JH. Index of microcirculatory resistance as predictor for microvascular functional recovery in patients with anterior myocardial infarction. J Korean Med Sci. 2012; 27:1044–1050.
Article
11. Fearon WF, Low AF, Yong AS, McGeoch R, Berry C, Shah MG, et al. Prognostic value of the Index of Microcirculatory Resistance measured after primary percutaneous coronary intervention. Circulation. 2013; 127:2436–2441.
Article
12. O'Gara PT, Kushner FG, Ascheim DD, Casey DE Jr, Chung MK, de Lemos JA, et al. 2013 ACCF/AHA guideline for the management of ST-elevation myocardial infarction: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. Circulation. 2013; 127:e362–e425.
13. Wilson RF, Wyche K, Christensen BV, Zimmer S, Laxson DD. Effects of adenosine on human coronary arterial circulation. Circulation. 1990; 82:1595–1606.
Article
14. Pijls NH, De Bruyne B, Smith L, Aarnoudse W, Barbato E, Bartunek J, et al. Coronary thermodilution to assess flow reserve: validation in humans. Circulation. 2002; 105:2482–2486.
15. Pijls NH, De Bruyne B, Peels K, Van Der Voort PH, Bonnier HJ, Bartunek J, Koolen JJ, et al. Measurement of fractional flow reserve to assess the functional severity of coronary-artery stenoses. N Engl J Med. 1996; 334:1703–1708.
Article
16. De Bruyne B, Pijls NH, Smith L, Wievegg M, Heyndrickx GR. Coronary thermodilution to assess flow reserve: experimental validation. Circulation. 2001; 104:2003–2006.
17. Lang RM, Bierig M, Devereux RB, Flachskampf FA, Foster E, Pellikka PA, et al. Recommendations for chamber quantification: a report from the American Society of Echocardiography’s Guidelines and Standards Committee and the Chamber Quantification Writing Group, developed in conjunction with the European Association of Echocardiography, a branch of the European Society of Cardiology. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2005; 18:1440–1463.
Article
18. O'Rourke MF. Arterial aging: pathophysiological principles. Vasc Med. 2007; 12:329–341.
19. Rizzoni D, Porteri E, Boari GE, De Ciuceis C, Sleiman I, Muiesan ML, et al. Prognostic significance of small-artery structure in hypertension. Circulation. 2003; 108:2230–2235.
Article
20. Safar ME. Peripheral pulse pressure, large arteries, and microvessels. Hypertension. 2004; 44:121–122.
21. Potenza MA, Gagliardi S, Nacci C, Carratu' MR, Montagnani M. Endothelial dysfunction in diabetes: from mechanisms to therapeutic targets. Curr Med Chem. 2009; 16:94–112.
Article
22. Marciano C, Galderisi M, Gargiulo P, Acampa W, D'Amore C, Esposito R, et al. Effects of type 2 diabetes mellitus on coronary microvascular function and myocardial perfusion in patients without obstructive coronary artery disease. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2012; 39:1199–1206.
Article
23. Rathore SS, Curtis JP, Chen J, Wang Y, Nallamothu BK, Epstein AJ, et al. Association of door-to-balloon time and mortality in patients admitted to hospital with ST elevation myocardial infarction: national cohort study. BMJ. 2009; 338:b1807.
Article
24. McNamara RL, Wang Y, Herrin J, Curtis JP, Bradley EH, Magid DJ, et al. Effect of door-to-balloon time on mortality in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006; 47:2180–2186.
Article
25. De Luca G, Suryapranata H, Ottervanger JP, Antman EM. Time delay to treatment and mortality in primary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction: every minute of delay counts. Circulation. 2004; 109:1223–1225.
Article
26. O'Gara PT, Kushner FG, Ascheim DD, Casey DE Jr, Chung MK, de Lemos JA, et al. 2013 ACCF/AHA guideline for the management of ST-elevation myocardial infarction: executive summary: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. Circulation. 2013; 127:529–555.
27. Menees DS, Peterson ED, Wang Y, Curtis JP, Messenger JC, Rumsfeld JS, et al. Door-to-balloon time and mortality among patients undergoing primary PCI. N Engl J Med. 2013; 369:901–909.
Article
28. Gibson CM, Schömig A. Coronary and myocardial angiography: angiographic assessment of both epicardial and myocardial perfusion. Circulation. 2004; 109:3096–3105.
29. Angeja BG, Gunda M, Murphy SA, Sobel BE, Rundle AC, Syed M, et al. TIMI myocardial perfusion grade and ST segment resolution: association with infarct size as assessed by single photon emission computed tomography imaging. Circulation. 2002; 105:282–285.
Article
30. Lim HS, Yoon MH, Tahk SJ, Yang HM, Choi BJ, Choi SY, et al. Usefulness of the index of microcirculatory resistance for invasively assessing myocardial viability immediately after primary angioplasty for anterior myocardial infarction. Eur Heart J. 2009; 30:2854–2860.
Article
31. Byrne RA, Ndrepepa G, Braun S, Tiroch K, Mehilli J, Schulz S, et al. Peak cardiac troponin-T level, scintigraphic myocardial infarct size and one-year prognosis in patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention for acute myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiol. 2010; 106:1212–1217.
Article
32. Chin CT, Wang TY, Li S, Wiviott SD, deLemos JA, Kontos MC, et al. Comparison of the prognostic value of peak creatine kinase-MB and troponin levels among patients with acute myocardial infarction: a report from the Acute Coronary Treatment and Intervention Outcomes Network Registry-get with the guidelines. Clin Cardiol. 2012; 35:424–429.
Article
33. Tamita K, Akasaka T, Takagi T, Yamamuro A, Yamabe K, Katayama M, et al. Effects of microvascular dysfunction on myocardial fractional flow reserve after percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with acute myocardial infarction. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2002; 57:452–459.
Article
34. Ntalianis A, Sels JW, Davidavicius G, Tanaka N, Muller O, Trana C, et al. Fractional flow reserve for the assessment of nonculprit coronary artery stenoses in patients with acute myocardial infarction. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2010; 3:1274–1281.
Article
35. Gibson CM, Pinto D. Fractional flow reserve: a new set of lenses for the occulostenotic reflex? JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2010; 3:1282–1283.
36. Murai T, Lee T, Yonetsu T, Iwai T, Takagi T, Hishikari K, et al. Variability of microcirculatory resistance index and its relationship with fractional flow reserve in patients with intermediate coronary artery lesions. Circ J. 2013; 77:1769–1776.
Article
37. Harjai KJ, Mehta RH, Stone GW, Boura JA, Grines L, Brodie BR, et al. Does proximal location of culprit lesion confer worse prognosis in patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention for ST elevation myocardial infarction? J Interv Cardiol. 2006; 19:285–294.
Article
38. Vlaar PJ, Svilaas T, van der Horst IC, Diercks GF, Fokkema ML, de Smet BJ, et al. Cardiac death and reinfarction after 1 year in the Thrombus Aspiration during Percutaneous coronary intervention in Acute myocardial infarction Study (TAPAS): a 1-year follow-up study. Lancet. 2008; 371:1915–1920.
Article
39. Fröbert O, Lagerqvist B, Olivecrona GK, Omerovic E, Gudnason T, Maeng M, et al. Thrombus aspiration during ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med. 2013; 369:1587–1597.
Article
40. Woo SI, Park SD, Kim DH, Kwan J, Shin SH, Park KS, et al. Thrombus aspiration during primary percutaneous coronary intervention for preserving the index of microcirculatory resistance: a randomised study. EuroIntervention. 2014; 9:1057–1062.
Article
41. Sethi A, Bajaj A, Bahekar A, Bhuriya R, Singh M, Ahmed A, et al. Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors with or without thienopyridine pretreatment improve outcomes after primary percutaneous coronary intervention in high-risk patients with ST elevation myocardial infarction--a meta-regression of randomized controlled trials. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2013; 82:171–181.
Article
Full Text Links
  • YMJ
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr