J Vet Sci.  2015 Mar;16(1):93-98. 10.4142/jvs.2015.16.1.93.

Intercostal thoracotomy in 20 dogs: muscle-sparing versus traditional techniques

• Yoon HY
• Lee S
• Jeong SW

• KMID: 2160825
• DOI: http://doi.org/10.4142/jvs.2015.16.1.93

Abstract

The levels of pain, duration of approaching and closure, and surgical exposure associated with intercostal thoracotomy were compared between muscle-sparing and traditional techniques in 20 dogs. Postoperative pain was assessed based on numerical pain scores using behavioral observation, heart rate, respiratory rate, and wound palpation. Time for approaching and closure were measured, and the extent of intrathoracic organ exposure for the surgical procedures was described for each technique. There were significant differences in numerical pain scores at 2 h as well as 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7 days after surgery between the two groups (p < 0.0001). There was no significant (p = 0.725) difference in times for approaching and closure between the two groups. Compared to the traditional method, the muscle-sparing technique also achieved the desired exposure without compromising exposure of the target organs. Our results suggest that the muscle-sparing technique is more effective than the traditional method for providing a less painful recovery during the first 7 days after intercostal thoracotomy. Additionally, the muscle-sparing technique is as effective as the traditional modality for providing an appropriate time for approaching and closure during intercostal thoracotomy as well as adequate organ exposure for the surgical procedures.

Keyword

dogs; intercostal thoracotomy; muscle-sparing

MeSH Terms

Animals
Dog Diseases/*etiology
Dogs
Pain Measurement/veterinary
Pain, Postoperative/etiology/*veterinary
Thoracotomy/adverse effects/methods/*veterinary

Figure

• 

  Fig. 1 Muscle-sparing technique. (A) Skin, subcutaneous tissue, and cutaneous trunci muscle incisions extended from 2 cm ventral to the rib head to the area near the sternum. (B) The ventral border of the latissimus dorsi muscle was bluntly dissected. (C) The latissimus dorsi muscle was retracted dorsally using a Senn-Miller retractor and the scalenus muscle was detached from the rib. (D) Serrations of the serratus ventralis muscle were split at the intended intercostal space and a Senn-Miller retractor was placed for pectoral muscles retraction. (E) A Balfour retractor was placed for rib and muscle retraction. Side blades were used for rib retraction, and a center blade was used for retraction of the latissimus dorsi muscle and serratus ventralis muscle.

Reference

1. Akçali Y, Demir H, Tezcan B. The effect of standard posterolateral versus muscle-sparing thoracotomy on multiple parameters. Ann Thorac Surg. 2003; 76:1050–1054.

2. Conzemius MG, Brockman DJ, King LG, Perkowski SZ. Analgesia in dogs after intercostal thoracotomy: a clinical trial comparing intravenous buprenorphine and intrapleural bupivacaine. Vet Surg. 1994; 23:291–298.

3. Conzemius MG, Hill CM, Sammarco JL, Perkowski SZ. Correlation between subjective and objective measures used to determine severity of postoperative pain in dogs. J Am Vet Med Assoc. 1997; 210:1619–1622.

4. Evans HE. Miller's Anatomy of the Dog. In : Evans HE, editor. Muscles of the truck. 3rd ed. Philadelphia: WB Saunders;1993. p. 290–319.

5. Evans HE. Miller's Anatomy of the Dog. In : Evans HE, editor. Thoracic nerves. 3rd ed. Philadelphia: WB Saunders;1993. p. 860–865.

6. Fossum TW. Small Animal Surgery. In : Fossum TW, editor. Surgery of the lower respiratory system: pleural cavity and diaphragm. 3rd ed. St. Louis: Mosby;2007. p. 871–874.

7. Gilroy BA. Effect of intercostal nerve blocks on post thoracotomy ventilation and oxygenation in the canine. J Vet Crit Care. 1982; 6:1–9.

8. Holton LL, Scott EM, Nolan AM, Reid J, Welsh E. Relationship between physiological factors and clinical pain in dogs scored using a numerical rating scale. J Small Anim Pract. 1998; 39:469–474.

9. Hunt GB. Veterinary Surgery: Small Animal. In : Tobias KM, Johnston SA, editors. Thoracic wall. 1st ed. St. Louis: Saunders;2012. p. 1769–1786.

10. Moores AL, Halfacree ZJ, Baines SJ, Lipscomb VJ. Indications, outcomes and complications following lateral thoracotomy in dogs and cats. J Small Anim Pract. 2007; 48:695–698.

11. Moorjani N, Zhao F, Tian Y, Liang C, Kaluba J, Maiwand MO. Effects of cryoanalgesia on post-thoracotomy pain and on the structure of intercostal nerves: a human prospective randomized trial and a histological study. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2001; 20:502–507.

12. Orton EC. Textbook of Small Animal Surgery. In : Slatter DH, editor. Thoracic wall. 3rd ed. Philadelphia: Saunders;2003. p. 373–387.

13. Pavlidou K, Papazoglou L, Savvas I, Kazakos G. Analgesia for small animal thoracic surgery. Compend Contin Educ Vet. 2009; 31:432–436.

14. Pascoe PJ, Dyson DH. Analgesia after lateral thoracotomy in dogs. Epidural morphine vs. intercostal bupivacaine. Vet Surg. 1993; 22:141–147.

15. Rooney MB, Mehl M, Monnet E. Intercostal thoracotomy closure: transcostal sutures as a less painful alternative to circumcostal suture placement. Vet Surg. 2004; 33:209–213.

16. Tattersall JA, Welsh E. Factors influencing the short-term outcome following thoracic surgery in 98 dogs. J Small Anim Pract. 2006; 47:715–720.

17. Walsh PJ, Remedios AM, Ferguson JF, Walker DD, Cantwell S, Duke T. Thoracoscopic versus open partial pericardectomy in dogs: comparison of postoperative pain and morbidity. Vet Surg. 1999; 28:472–479.