Korean J Gastroenterol.  2014 May;63(5):268-275. 10.4166/kjg.2014.63.5.268.

The Evolution of Bowel Preparation and New Developments

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Internal Medicine, Dongguk University College of Medicine, Gyeongju, Korea. chhyang@dongguk.ac.kr

Abstract

Bowel preparation is essential for successful colonoscopy examination, and the most important factor is the bowel preparation agent used. However, selection of a bowel preparation agent invariably involves compromise. Originally, bowel preparation was performed for radiologic and surgical purposes, when the process involved dietary limitations, cathartics, and enemas, which had many side effects. Development of polyethylene glycol (PEG) solution led to substantive advancement of bowel preparation; however, despite its effectiveness and safety, the large volume involved, and its salty taste and unpleasant odor reduce compliance. Accordingly, modified PEG solutions requiring consumption of lower volumes and sulfate-free solutions were developed. Aqueous sodium phosphate is more effective and better tolerated than PEG solutions; however, fatal complications have occurred due to water and electrolyte shifts. Therefore, aqueous sodium phosphate was withdrawn by the US Food and Drug Administration, and currently, only sodium phosphate tablets remain available. In addition, oral sulfate solution and sodium picosulfate/magnesium citrate are also available, and various studies have reported on adjunctive preparations, such as hyperosmolar or stimulant laxatives, antiemetics, and prokinetics, which are now in various stages of development.

Keyword

Bowel preparation; Colonoscopy; Polyethylene glycols; Sodium phosphate; Picosulfate sodium

MeSH Terms

Administration, Oral
Cathartics/*administration & dosage
Citrates/administration & dosage
Citric Acid/administration & dosage
Colonic Diseases/diagnosis
Colonoscopy
Humans
Organometallic Compounds/administration & dosage
Phosphates/administration & dosage
Picolines/administration & dosage
Polyethylene Glycols/administration & dosage
Cathartics
Citrates
Organometallic Compounds
Phosphates
Picolines
Citric Acid
Polyethylene Glycols

Cited by  3 articles

Randomized Controlled Trial of Sodium Phosphate Tablets versus 2 L Polyethylene Glycol Solution for Bowel Cleansing prior to Colonoscopy
Yun Ho Lee, Seong Yeon Jeong, You Sun Kim, Hye Jin Jung, Min Jung Kwon, Cheol Hun Kwak, Song I Bae, Jeong Seop Moon, Ji Won Kim, Su Hwan Kim, Kook Lae Lee
Korean J Gastroenterol. 2015;65(1):27-34.    doi: 10.4166/kjg.2015.65.1.27.

Comparative Study on Bowel Preparation Efficacy of Ascorbic Acid Containing Polyethylene Glycol by Adding Either Simethicone or 1 L of Water in Health Medical Examination Patients: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Study
Se Hwan Yeo, Jae Hoon Kwak, Yeo Un Kim, Tae Ho Kwon, Jeong Bae Park, Jun Hyung Park, Yong Kook Lee, Yun Jeong Lim, Chang Heon Yang
Korean J Gastroenterol. 2016;67(4):189-197.    doi: 10.4166/kjg.2016.67.4.189.

Formulation and Management of Poor Bowel Preparation: A Survey Study
Jae Ho Seong, Jin Sae Yoo, Kyong Joo Lee, Hong Jun Park, Hee Man Kim, Jae Woo Kim, Hyun-Soo Kim
Korean J Gastroenterol. 2016;68(2):70-76.    doi: 10.4166/kjg.2016.68.2.70.


Reference

References

1. Beck DE, Harford FJ, DiPalma JA. Comparison of cleansing methods in preparation for colonic surgery. Dis Colon Rectum. 1985; 28:491–495.
Article
2. Avgerinos A, Kalantzis N, Rekoumis G, Pallikaris G, Arapakis G, Kanaghinis T. Bowel preparation and the risk of explosion during colonoscopic polypectomy. Gut. 1984; 25:361–364.
Article
3. Bonnet YY, Schutz R, Chipponi J, Haberer JP, Mercier R. Intraoperative digestive explosions after preparation with mannitol. Role of anesthetic gases. Presse Med. 1983; 12:171.
4. Davis GR, Santa Ana CA, Morawski SG, Fordtran JS. Development of a lavage solution associated with minimal water and electrolyte absorption or secretion. Gastroenterology. 1980; 78:991–995.
Article
5. DiPalma JA, Brady CE 3rd, Stewart DL, et al. Comparison of colon cleansing methods in preparation for colonoscopy. Gastroenterology. 1984; 86:856–860.
6. Ernstoff JJ, Howard DA, Marshall JB, Jumshyd A, McCullough AJ. A randomized blinded clinical trial of a rapid colonic lavage solution (Golytely) compared with standard preparation for colonoscopy and barium enema. Gastroenterology. 1983; 84:1512–1516.
Article
7. Thomas G, Brozinsky S, Isenberg JI. Patient acceptance and effectiveness of a balanced lavage solution (Golytely) versus the standard preparation for colonoscopy. Gastroenterology. 1982; 82:435–437.
Article
8. Ell C, Fischbach W, Keller R, et al. Hintertux Study Group. A randomized, blinded, prospective trial to compare the safety and efficacy of three bowel-cleansing solutions for colonoscopy (HSG-01*). Endoscopy. 2003; 35:300–304.
Article
9. Chang KJ, Erickson RA, Schandler S, Coye T, Moody C. Per-rectal pulsed irrigation versus peroral colonic lavage for colonoscopy preparation: a randomized, controlled trial. Gastrointest Endosc. 1991; 37:444–448.
Article
10. Wexner SD, Beck DE, Baron TH, et al. A consensus document on bowel preparation before colonoscopy: prepared by a task force from the American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons (ASCRS), the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ASGE), and the Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES). Dis Colon Rectum. 2006; 49:792–809.
Article
11. Atreja A, Nepal S, Lashner BA. Making the most of currently available bowel preparations for colonoscopy. Cleve Clin J Med. 2010; 77:317–326.
Article
12. Sondheimer JM, Sokol RJ, Taylor SF, Silverman A, Zelasney B. Safety, efficacy, and tolerance of intestinal lavage in pediatric patients undergoing diagnostic colonoscopy. J Pediatr. 1991; 119:148–152.
Article
13. Gremse DA, Sacks AI, Raines S. Comparison of oral sodium phosphate to polyethylene glycol-based solution for bowel preparation for colonoscopy in children. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 1996; 23:586–590.
Article
14. Tolia V, Fleming S, Dubois RS. Use of Golytely in children and adolescents. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 1984; 3:468–470.
Article
15. Marschall HU, Bartels F. Life-threatening complications of nasogastric administration of polyethylene glycol-electrolyte solutions (Golytely) for bowel cleansing. Gastrointest Endosc. 1998; 47:408–410.
Article
16. Clark LE, Dipalma JA. Safety issues regarding colonic cleansing for diagnostic and surgical procedures. Drug Saf. 2004; 27:1235–1242.
Article
17. Nelson DB, Barkun AN, Block KP, et al. Technology Status Evaluation report. Colonoscopy preparations. May 2001. Gastrointest Endosc. 2001; 54:829–832.
18. Golub RW, Kerner BA, Wise WE Jr, et al. Colonoscopic bowel preparations–which one? A blinded, prospective, randomized trial. Dis Colon Rectum. 1995; 38:594–599.
19. Marshall JB, Pineda JJ, Barthel JS, King PD. Prospective, randomized trial comparing sodium phosphate solution with polyethylene glycol-electrolyte lavage for colonoscopy preparation. Gastrointest Endosc. 1993; 39:631–634.
Article
20. Lever EL, Walter MH, Condon SC, et al. Addition of enemas to oral lavage preparation for colonoscopy is not necessary. Gastrointest Endosc. 1992; 38:369–372.
Article
21. Rösch T, Classen M. Fractional cleansing of the large bowel with "Golytely" for colonoscopic preparation: a controlled trial. Endoscopy. 1987; 19:198–200.
Article
22. Church JM. Effectiveness of polyethylene glycol antegrade gut lavage bowel preparation for colonoscopy–timing is the key! Dis Colon Rectum. 1998; 41:1223–1225.
Article
23. Aoun E, Abdul-Baki H, Azar C, et al. A randomized single-blind trial of split-dose PEG-electrolyte solution without dietary restriction compared with whole dose PEG-electrolyte solution with dietary restriction for colonoscopy preparation. Gastrointest Endosc. 2005; 62:213–218.
Article
24. Kim HS, Park DH, Kim JW, et al. Effectiveness of walking exercise as a bowel preparation for colonoscopy: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Gastroenterol. 2005; 100:1964–1969.
Article
25. Brady CE 3rd, Dipalma JA, Beck DE. Effect of bisacodyl on gut lavage cleansing for colonoscopy. Ann Clin Res. 1987; 19:34–38.
26. Adams WJ, Meagher AP, Lubowski DZ, King DW. Bisacodyl reduces the volume of polyethylene glycol solution required for bowel preparation. Dis Colon Rectum. 1994; 37:229–233.
Article
27. Kao D, Lalor E, Sandha G, et al. A randomized controlled trial of four precolonoscopy bowel cleansing regimens. Can J Gastroenterol. 2011; 25:657–662.
Article
28. Ker TS. Comparison of reduced volume versus four-liter electrolyte lavage solutions for colon cleansing. Am Surg. 2006; 72:909–911.
Article
29. Sharma VK, Steinberg EN, Vasudeva R, Howden CW. Randomized, controlled study of pretreatment with magnesium citrate on the quality of colonoscopy preparation with polyethylene glycol electrolyte lavage solution. Gastrointest Endosc. 1997; 46:541–543.
Article
30. Sharma VK, Chockalingham SK, Ugheoke EA, et al. Prospective, randomized, controlled comparison of the use of polyethylene glycol electrolyte lavage solution in four-liter versus two-liter volumes and pretreatment with either magnesium citrate or bisacodyl for colonoscopy preparation. Gastrointest Endosc. 1998; 47:167–171.
Article
31. Ziegenhagen DJ, Zehnter E, Tacke W, Kruis W. Addition of senna improves colonoscopy preparation with lavage: a prospective randomized trial. Gastrointest Endosc. 1991; 37:547–549.
Article
32. Ziegenhagen DJ, Zehnter E, Tacke W, Gheorghiu T, Kruis W. Senna vs. bisacodyl in addition to Golytely lavage for colonoscopy preparation–a prospective randomized trial. Z Gastroenterol. 1992; 30:17–19.
33. Iida Y, Miura S, Asada Y, et al. Bowel preparation for the total colonoscopy by 2,000 ml of balanced lavage solution (Golytely) and sennoside. Gastroenterol Jpn. 1992; 27:728–733.
Article
34. Radaelli F, Meucci G, Imperiali G, et al. High-dose senna compared with conventional PEG-ES lavage as bowel preparation for elective colonoscopy: a prospective, randomized, investigatorblinded trial. Am J Gastroenterol. 2005; 100:2674–2680.
Article
35. Amato A, Radaelli F, Paggi S, Terruzzi V. Half doses of PEG-ES and senna vs. high-dose senna for bowel cleansing before colonoscopy: a randomized, investigatorblinded trial. Am J Gastroenterol. 2010; 105:675–681.
Article
36. Rhodes JB, Engstrom J, Stone KF. Metoclopramide reduces the distress associated with colon cleansing by an oral electrolyte overload. Gastrointest Endosc. 1978; 24:162–163.
Article
37. Brady CE 3rd, DiPalma JA, Pierson WP. Golytely lavage–is metoclopramide necessary? Am J Gastroenterol. 1985; 80:180–184.
38. Martínek J, Hess J, Delarive J, et al. Cisapride does not improve precolonoscopy bowel preparation with either sodium phosphate or polyethylene glycol electrolyte lavage. Gastrointest Endosc. 2001; 54:180–185.
Article
39. Fordtran JS, Santa Ana CA, Cleveland MvB. A low-sodium solution for gastrointestinal lavage. Gastroenterology. 1990; 98:11–16.
Article
40. DiPalma JA, Marshall JB. Comparison of a new sulfate-free polyethylene glycol electrolyte lavage solution versus a standard solution for colonoscopy cleansing. Gastrointest Endosc. 1990; 36:285–289.
Article
41. DiPalma JA, Wolff BG, Meagher A, Cleveland MV. Comparison of reduced volume versus four liters sulfate-free electrolyte lavage solutions for colonoscopy colon cleansing. Am J Gastroenterol. 2003; 98:2187–2191.
Article
42. Corporaal S, Kleibeuker JH, Koornstra JJ. Low-volume PEG plus ascorbic acid versus high-volume PEG as bowel preparation for colonoscopy. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2010; 45:1380–1386.
Article
43. Enestvedt BK, Fennerty MB, Eisen GM. Randomised clinical trial: MiraLAX vs. Golytely – a controlled study of efficacy and patient tolerability in bowel preparation for colonoscopy. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2011; 33:33–40.
Article
44. Schiller LR. Clinical pharmacology and use of laxatives and lavage solutions. J Clin Gastroenterol. 1999; 28:11–18.
Article
45. Tan JJ, Tjandra JJ. Which is the optimal bowel preparation for colonoscopy – a metaanalysis. Colorectal Dis. 2006; 8:247–258.
Article
46. Belsey J, Epstein O, Heresbach D. Systematic review: oral bowel preparation for colonoscopy. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2007; 25:373–384.
Article
47. Kastenberg D, Chasen R, Choudhary C, et al. Efficacy and safety of sodium phosphate tablets compared with PEG solution in colon cleansing: two identically designed, randomized, controlled, parallel group, multicenter phase III trials. Gastrointest Endosc. 2001; 54:705–713.
Article
48. Balaban DH, Leavell BS Jr, Oblinger MJ, Thompson WO, Bolton ND, Pambianco DJ. Low volume bowel preparation for colonoscopy: randomized, endoscopist-blinded trial of liquid sodium phosphate versus tablet sodium phosphate. Am J Gastroenterol. 2003; 98:827–832.
Article
49. Hsu CW, Imperiale TF. Meta-analysis and cost comparison of polyethylene glycol lavage versus sodium phosphate for colonoscopy preparation. Gastrointest Endosc. 1998; 48:276–282.
Article
50. Markowitz GS, Stokes MB, Radhakrishnan J, D'Agati VD. Acute phosphate nephropathy following oral sodium phosphate bowel purgative: an underrecognized cause of chronic renal failure. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2005; 16:3389–3396.
Article
51. Linden TB, Waye JD. Sodium phosphate preparation for colonoscopy: onset and duration of bowel activity. Gastrointest Endosc. 1999; 50:811–813.
Article
52. Barkun A, Chiba N, Enns R, et al. Commonly used preparations for colonoscopy: efficacy, tolerability, and safety–a Canadian Association of Gastroenterology position paper. Can J Gastroenterol. 2006; 20:699–710.
53. Makkar R, Shen B. What are the caveats to using sodium phosphate agents for bowel preparation? Cleve Clin J Med. 2008; 75:173–176.
54. Markowitz GS, Nasr SH, Klein P, et al. Renal failure due to acute nephrocalcinosis following oral sodium phosphate bowel cleansing. Hum Pathol. 2004; 35:675–684.
Article
55. Hookey LC, Depew WT, Vanner S. The safety profile of oral sodium phosphate for colonic cleansing before colonoscopy in adults. Gastrointest Endosc. 2002; 56:895–902.
Article
56. Rejchrt S, Bures J, Siroký M, Kopácová M, Slezák L, Langr F. A prospective, observational study of colonic mucosal abnormalities associated with orally administered sodium phosphate for colon cleansing before colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc. 2004; 59:651–654.
Article
57. Curran MP, Plosker GL. Oral sodium phosphate solution: a review of its use as a colorectal cleanser. Drugs. 2004; 64:1697–1714.
58. Thomson A, Naidoo P, Crotty B. Bowel preparation for colonoscopy: a randomized prospective trail comparing sodium phosphate and polyethylene glycol in a predominantly elderly population. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 1996; 11:103–107.
59. Seinelä L, Pehkonen E, Laasanen T, Ahvenainen J. Bowel preparation for colonoscopy in very old patients: a randomized prospective trial comparing oral sodium phosphate and polyethylene glycol electrolyte lavage solution. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2003; 38:216–220.
60. Barclay RL, Depew WT, Vanner SJ. Carbohydrate-electrolyte re-hydration protects against intravascular volume contraction during colonic cleansing with orally administered sodium phosphate. Gastrointest Endosc. 2002; 56:633–638.
Article
61. Tjandra JJ, Tagkalidis P. Carbohydrate-electrolyte (E-Lyte) solution enhances bowel preparation with oral fleet phospho-soda. Dis Colon Rectum. 2004; 47:1181–1186.
Article
62. Gurudu SR, Li F, Fleischer DE, et al. Patient preference and acceptance with sodium phosphate tablet preparation for colonoscopy. Dig Dis Sci. 2009; 54:1555–1559.
Article
63. Khashab M, Rex DK. Efficacy and tolerability of a new formulation of sodium phosphate tablets (INKP-101), and a reduced sodium phosphate dose, in colon cleansing: a single-center open-label pilot trial. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2005; 21:465–468.
Article
64. Rex DK, Chasen R, Pochapin MB. Safety and efficacy of two reduced dosing regimens of sodium phosphate tablets for preparation prior to colonoscopy. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2002; 16:937–944.
Article
65. Pelham RW, Russell RG, Padgett EL, Reno FE, Cleveland MV. Safety of oral sulfates in rats and dogs contrasted with phosphate-induced nephropathy in rats. Int J Toxicol. 2009; 28:99–112.
66. Patel V, Nicar M, Emmett M, et al. Intestinal and renal effects of low-volume phosphate and sulfate cathartic solutions designed for cleansing the colon: pathophysiological studies in five normal subjects. Am J Gastroenterol. 2009; 104:953–965.
Article
67. Rex DK, Di Palma JA, Rodriguez R, McGowan J, Cleveland M. A randomized clinical study comparing reduced-volume oral sulfate solution with standard 4-liter sulfate-free electrolyte lavage solution as preparation for colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc. 2010; 72:328–336.
Article
68. Hamilton D, Mulcahy D, Walsh D, Farrelly C, Tormey WP, Watson G. Sodium picosulphate compared with polyethylene glycol solution for large bowel lavage: a prospective randomised trial. Br J Clin Pract. 1996; 50:73–75.
69. Regev A, Fraser G, Delpre G, et al. Comparison of two bowel preparations for colonoscopy: sodium picosulphate with magnesium citrate versus sulphate-free polyethylene glycol lavage solution. Am J Gastroenterol. 1998; 93:1478–1482.
Article
70. Schmidt LM, Williams P, King D, Perera D. Picoprep-3 is a superior colonoscopy preparation to Fleet: a randomized, controlled trial comparing the two bowel preparations. Dis Colon Rectum. 2004; 47:238–242.
Article
71. Tjandra JJ, Chan M, Tagkalidis PP. Oral sodium phosphate (Fleet) is a superior colonoscopy preparation to Picopre (sodium pico-sulfate-based preparation). Dis Colon Rectum. 2006; 49:616–620.
72. Thomson J, Phull P. Audit of bowel preparation with Picolax (sodium picosulfate plus magnesium citrate) for colonoscopy. Int J Clin Pract. 2006; 60:602–603.
Article
73. Love J, Bernard EJ, Cockeram A, et al. A multicentre, observational study of sodium picosulfate and magnesium citrate as a precolonoscopy bowel preparation. Can J Gastroenterol. 2009; 23:706–710.
Article
Full Text Links
  • KJG
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr