J Korean Med Assoc.  2016 Feb;59(2):127-135. 10.5124/jkma.2016.59.2.127.

Reconstruction of hand

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Gwangmyeong Sungae Hospital, Gwangmyeong, Korea. drkim@korea.com

Abstract

The characteristics of hand trauma are changing due to automation of industrial facilities, improved access to health care, and the aging population. Since the inception of hand surgery as a subspecialty, hand defects have been reconstructed with the restoration of the original functionality as the primary goal. With advancement and maturation of surgical techniques, however, restoration of aesthetics also began to take hold as an important aspect of hand surgery practice. After the first successful replantation of an amputated digit, the rapid development of microsurgical techniques had a significant impact on the field of reconstructive hand surgery. In the first two decades, the success of replantation was evaluated by the survival rate for a single operator or a specialized institution. These days, however, microsurgical techniques have been widely adopted, with digital replantation possible even for infants. In addition to various local flaps, the evolution of free flaps has vastly expanded the repertoire of reconstructive options for hand surgeons. With the wide variety of free flaps available, it is possible for a severely injured hand to be salvaged and restored to its original functional and aesthetic status. In South Korea, hand surgery is becoming an established profession with a separate subspecialty certification. Hand surgery has a bright outlook, with future research directed at new biocompatible materials and novel reconstructive methods.

Keyword

Hand surgery; Replantation; Microsurgery

MeSH Terms

Aging
Automation
Biocompatible Materials
Certification
Esthetics
Free Tissue Flaps
Hand*
Health Services Accessibility
Humans
Infant
Korea
Microsurgery
Replantation
Survival Rate
Biocompatible Materials

Figure

  • Figure 1 Replantation. (A) Complete amputation of index finger at proximal phalanx base level. (B) Fracture fixation. (C) Tendon repair. (D) Digital artery and nerve anastomosis. (E) Dorsal vein anastomosis. (F) Immediate postoperative view.

  • Figure 2 Replantation in children (A) Multiple amputation of index and long finger. (B,C) One-year follow-up view after replantation, noted near normal appearance and growth.

  • Figure 3 Pollicization. (A) Left thumb defect due to avulsive injury. (B) Immediate postoperative view. (C) Six-months follow-up view.

  • Figure 4 Second toe transfer. (A) Multiple digital defect of right hand due to mutilating injury. (B) Donor site view. The second toe was selected. (C) Postoperative view.

  • Figure 5 Vascularized nail transfer. (A) Noted nail absence of thumb. (B) Vascularized big toe nail unit harvested. (C) Immediate postoperative view. (D) One-year follow-up view, showed near normal appearance.

  • Figure 6 Lateral arm free flap. (A) Skin and soft tissue defect of hand dorsum. (B) Immediate postoperative view. (C,D) One-year follow-up view.

  • Figure 7 Lateral arm fascia free flap. (A) Multiple skin defect of long and ring finger. (B) Vascularized fascia flap coverage with bridge pattern. (C) Six-months follow-up view after split thickness skin graft, noted acceptable finger contour.

  • Figure 8 Toe joint transfer. (A) Vascularized proximal interphalangeal joint harvested from second toe. (B) Preoperative X-ray finding, noted deformity of proximal interphalangeal joint of middle finger. (C,D) showed ulnar deviation and limitation of range of motion. (E) Intraoperative view. (F-H) Postoperative view, showed joint stability and increased range of motion.


Reference

1. Malt RA, Mckhann C. Replantation of severed arms. JAMA. 1964; 189:716–722.
Article
2. Komatsu S, Tamai S. Successful replantation of a completely cut-off thumb. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1968; 42:374–377.
Article
3. Hong SH, Rah SK, Park CS. Successful clinical replantation of digit and free flap transplantation with microvascular surgery. J Korean Soc Plast Reconstr Surg. 1979; 6:177–188.
4. Kim JS, Yang JW, Lee DC, Ki SH, Roh SY. Challenges in fingertip replantation. Semin Plast Surg. 2013; 27:165–173.
Article
5. Jeon BJ, Yang JW, Roh SY, Ki SH, Lee DC, Kim JS. Lateral nail fold incision technique for venous anastomosis in fingertip replantation. Ann Plast Surg. 2016; 76:67–71.
Article
6. Roh SY, Shim WC, Lee KJ, Lee DC, Kim JS, Yang JW. Short-term strength deficit following zone 1 replantations. Arch Plast Surg. 2015; 42:614–618.
Article
7. Cha GH, Woo SH, Lee DH, Seul JH. Immediate reconstruction of thumb tip injury. J Korean Soc Plast Reconstr Surg. 1991; 18:533–538.
8. Woo SH. Microsurgical reconstruction of the thumb. J Korean Soc Surg Hand. 2011; 16:98–115.
9. Buck-Gramcko D. Pollicization of the index finger: method and results in aplasia and hypoplasia of the thumb. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1971; 53:1605–1617.
10. Cobbett JR. Free digital transfer: report of a case of transfer of a great toe to replace an amputated thumb. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1969; 51:677–679.
11. Park JW, Byun JS, Baik BS. Reconstruction of fingers by microvascular toe transfer. J Korean Soc Plast Reconstr Surg. 1993; 20:394–409.
12. Hwang SM, Ahn SM, Lim KR, Jung YH, Ryu MH. Second Toe transfer for the thumb reconstruction. J Korean Soc Surg Hand. 2009; 14:95–101.
13. Jeon BJ, Yang JW, Roh SY, Ki SH, Lee DC, Kim JS. Microsurgical reconstruction of soft-tissue defects in digits. Injury. 2013; 44:356–360.
Article
14. Yoo MC, Chung DW, Han JS, Ahn JH, Cha SG. Clinical analysis of free vascular flap. J Korean Orthop Assoc. 1985; 20:1145–1152.
15. Lee DC, Kim JS, Ki SH, Roh SY, Yang JW, Chung KC. Partial second toe pulp free flap for fingertip reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2008; 121:899–907.
Article
16. Yang JW, Kim JS, Lee DC, Ki SH, Roh SY, Abdullah S, Tien HY. The radial artery superficial palmar branch flap: a modified free thenar flap with constant innervation. J Reconstr Microsurg. 2010; 26:529–538.
Article
17. Hong JP. The use of supermicrosurgery in lower extremity reconstruction: the next step in evolution. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009; 123:230–235.
Article
18. Koshima I, Yamamoto H, Hosoda M, Moriguchi T, Orita Y, Nagayama H. Free combined composite flaps using the lateral circumflex femoral system for repair of massive defects of the head and neck regions: an introduction to the chimeric flap principle. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1993; 92:411–420.
Article
19. Kim KW, Kim JS, Lee DC, Ki SH, Roh SY, Yang JW. Reconstruction of hand using anterolateral thigh fascial free flap. J Korean Soc Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009; 36:571–577.
20. Park HJ, Lee DC, Kim JS, Ki SH, Roh SY, Yang JW. Tenolysis after the reconstruction of PIP joint of the finger using second toe PIP joint free flap. J Korean Soc Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009; 36:450–457.
21. Squitieri L, Chung KC. A systematic review of outcomes and complications of vascularized toe joint transfer, silicone arthro-plasty, and PyroCarbon arthroplasty for posttraumatic joint reconstruction of the finger. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2008; 121:1697–1707.
Article
22. Dubernard JM, Owen E, Lefrancois N, Petruzzo P, Martin X, Dawahra M, Jullien D, Kanitakis J, Frances C, Preville X, Gebu-hrer L, Hakim N, Lanzetta M, Kapila H, Herzberg G, Revillard JP. First human hand transplantation: case report. Transpl Int. 2000; 13:Suppl 1. S521–S524.
Article
23. Jeon M, Lee D, Ki S, Roh S, Yang JW, Kim J. Present and future of hand surgery in Korea. J Korean Med Assoc. 2011; 54:589–593.
Article
Full Text Links
  • JKMA
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr