Korean J Pain.  2016 Jan;29(1):57-61. 10.3344/kjp.2016.29.1.57.

A Modified Approach of Percutaneous Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy (PELD) for Far Lateral Disc Herniation at L5-S1 with Foot Drop

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, School of Medicine, Ewha Womans University, Seoul, Korea. ingoo97@lycos.co.kr

Abstract

Foraminal or extraforaminal Far Lateral Disc Herniations (FLDH) extending into or beyond the foraminal zone have been recognized as between 7-12% of all lumbosacral disc herniations. Conventional posterior laminectomy may not provide good access to a herniation that lies far lateral to the lateral margin of the pedicle. Use of the endoscopic technique through a percutaneous approach to treat such FLDH patients can decrease the surgical morbidity while achieving better outcomes. We made an effort to utilize the advantages of percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy (PELD) and to determine the appropriate approach for FLDH at the level between the 5th Lumbar and first Sacral vertebrae(L5-S1). The authors present a case of an endoscopically resected lumbar extruded disc of the left extraforaminal zone with superior foraminal migration at the level of L5-S1, which had led to foot drop, while placing the endoscope in the anterior epidural space without facetectomy.

Keyword

Drop foot; Endoscopy; Herniated disc; Local anesthesia; Low back pain; Percutaneous discectomy

MeSH Terms

Anesthesia, Local
Diskectomy*
Diskectomy, Percutaneous
Endoscopes
Endoscopy
Epidural Space
Foot*
Humans
Intervertebral Disc Displacement
Laminectomy
Low Back Pain

Figure

  • Fig. 1 Preoperative magnetic resonance imaging showed disc extrusion to the left extraforaminal zone with superior foraminal migration below the L5 pedicle with a left L5 nerve compression. (A) Sagittal view, (B) axial view.

  • Fig. 2 The needle trajectory and skin entry point was decided using preoperative MRI. The skin entry point was closer (9 cm) and the angle of needle insertion was steeper (42 degree) than those of transforaminal approach (10−13 cm, 25−30 degree) [1112].

  • Fig. 3 Intraoperative fluoroscopic images showing the working cannula in the epidural space.

  • Fig. 4 Postoperative magnetic resonance imaging obtained 1 day after the procedure showing improvement of left L5 nerve compression and the resolution of the disc fragment in the left extraforaminal zone. (A) Sagittal view, (B) axial view.


Reference

1. Epstein NE. Evaluation of varied surgical approaches used in the management of 170 far-lateral lumbar disc herniations: indications and results. J Neurosurg. 1995; 83:648–656. PMID: 7674015.
Article
2. O'Hara LJ, Marshall RW. Far lateral lumbar disc herniation. The key to the intertransverse approach. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1997; 79:943–947. PMID: 9393908.
3. Choi G, Lee SH, Bhanot A, Raiturker PP, Chae YS. Percutaneous endoscopic discectomy for extraforaminal lumbar disc herniations: extraforaminal targeted fragmentectomy technique using working channel endoscope. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2007; 32:E93–E99. PMID: 17224806.
4. Ohmori K, Kanamori M, Kawaguchi Y, Ishihara H, Kimura T. Clinical features of extraforaminal lumbar disc herniation based on the radiographic location of the dorsal root ganglion. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2001; 26:662–666. PMID: 11246382.
Article
5. Park HW, Park KS, Park MS, Kim SM, Chung SY, Lee S. The comparisons of surgical outcomes and clinical characteristics between the far lateral lumbar disc herniations and the paramedian lumbar disc herniations. Korean J Spine. 2013; 10:155–159. PMID: 24757478.
Article
6. Yoshimoto M, Iwase T, Takebayashi T, Ida K, Yamashita T. Microendoscopic discectomy for far lateral lumbar disk herniation: less surgical invasiveness and minimum 2-year follow-up results. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2014; 27:E1–E7. PMID: 23429311.
7. Garrido E, Connaughton PN. Unilateral facetectomy approach for lateral lumbar disc herniation. J Neurosurg. 1991; 74:754–756. PMID: 2013776.
Article
8. Kim JE, Kim KH. Piriformis syndrome after percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy via the posterolateral approach. Eur Spine J. 2011; 20:1663–1668. PMID: 21416279.
Article
9. Kim KH. Use of lidocaine patch for percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy. Korean J Pain. 2011; 24:74–80. PMID: 21716614.
Article
10. Reulen HJ, Müller A, Ebeling U. Microsurgical anatomy of the lateral approach to extraforaminal lumbar disc herniations. Neurosurgery. 1996; 39:345–350. PMID: 8832672.
Article
11. Choi KC, Kim JS, Ryu KS, Kang BU, Ahn Y, Lee SH. Percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy for L5-S1 disc herniation: transforaminal versus interlaminar approach. Pain Physician. 2013; 16:547–556. PMID: 24284840.
12. Yeung AT, Tsou PM. Posterolateral endoscopic excision for lumbar disc herniation: surgical technique, outcome, and complications in 307 consecutive cases. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2002; 27:722–731. PMID: 11923665.
13. Ahn Y. Transforaminal percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy: technical tips to prevent complications. Expert Rev Med Devices. 2012; 9:361–366. PMID: 22905840.
Article
14. Ruetten S, Komp M, Merk H, Godolias G. Full-endoscopic interlaminar and transforaminal lumbar discectomy versus conventional microsurgical technique: a prospective, randomized, controlled study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2008; 33:931–939. PMID: 18427312.
Article
Full Text Links
  • KJP
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr