1. Salem YH, Majd M, Rushton HG, Belman AB. Outcome analysis of pediatric pyeloplasty as a function of patient age, presentation and differential renal function. J Urol. 1995; 154:1889–1893.
2. Lim DJ, Walker RD 3rd. Management of the failed pyeloplasty. J Urol. 1996; 156(2 Pt 2):738–740.
3. Thomas JC, DeMarco RT, Donohoe JM, Adams MC, Pope JC 4th, Brock JW 3rd. Management of the failed pyeloplasty: a contemporary review. J Urol. 2005; 174:2363–2366.
4. Anderson JC, Hynes W. Retrocaval ureter; a case diagnosed pre-operatively and treated successfully by a plastic operation. Br J Urol. 1949; 21:209–214.
5. Ng CS, Yost AJ, Streem SB. Management of failed primary intervention for ureteropelvic junction obstruction: 12-year, single-center experience. Urology. 2003; 61:291–296.
6. Fernbach SK, Maizels M, Conway JJ. Ultrasound grading of hydronephrosis: introduction to the system used by the Society for Fetal Urology. Pediatr Radiol. 1993; 23:478–480.
7. Moghazi S, Jones E, Schroepple J, Arya K, McClellan W, Hennigar RA, et al. Correlation of renal histopathology with sonographic findings. Kidney Int. 2005; 67:1515–1520.
8. Braga LH, Lorenzo AJ, Skeldon S, Dave S, Bagli DJ, Khoury AE, et al. Failed pyeloplasty in children: comparative analysis of retrograde endopyelotomy versus redo pyeloplasty. J Urol. 2007; 178:2571–2575.
9. Helmy TE, Sarhan OM, Hafez AT, Elsherbiny MT, Dawaba ME, Ghali AM. Surgical management of failed pyeloplasty in children: single-center experience. J Pediatr Urol. 2009; 5:87–89.
10. Seixas-Mikelus SA, Jenkins LC, Williot P, Greenfield SP. Pediatric pyeloplasty: comparison of literature meta-analysis of laparoscopic and open techniques with open surgery at a single institution. J Urol. 2009; 182:2428–2432.
11. Romao RL, Koyle MA, Pippi Salle JL, Alotay A, Figueroa VH, Lorenzo AJ, et al. Failed pyeloplasty in children: revisiting the unknown. Urology. 2013; 82:1145–1147.
12. Heinlen JE, Manatt CS, Bright BC, Kropp BP, Campbell JB, Frimberger D. Operative versus nonoperative management of ureteropelvic junction obstruction in children. Urology. 2009; 73:521–525.
13. Szavay PO, Luithle T, Seitz G, Warmann SW, Haber P, Fuchs J. Functional outcome after laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty in children. J Pediatr Urol. 2010; 6:359–363.
14. Materny J, Mazurkiewicz I, Gawrych E, Birkenfeld B, Zorga P. Does Hynes-Anderson pyeloplasty improve renal function? Ann Acad Med Stetin. 2010; 56:95–102.
15. Harraz AM, Helmy T, Taha DE, Shalaby I, Sarhan O, Dawaba M, et al. Changes in differential renal function after pyeloplasty in children. J Urol. 2013; 190:4 Suppl. 1468–1473.
16. Beland MD, Walle NL, Machan JT, Cronan JJ. Renal cortical thickness measured at ultrasound: is it better than renal length as an indicator of renal function in chronic kidney disease? AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2010; 195:W146–W149.
17. Kaplon DM, Lasser MS, Sigman M, Haleblian GE, Pareek G. Renal parenchyma thickness: a rapid estimation of renal function on computed tomography. Int Braz J Urol. 2009; 35:3–8.
18. Park K, Baek M, Cho SY, Choi H. Time course of hydronephrotic changes following unilateral pyeloplasty. J Pediatr Urol. 2013; 9(6 Pt A):779–783.
19. Bhat GS, Maregowda S, Jayaram S, Siddappa S. Is renal biopsy a better predictor of the outcome of pyeloplasty in adult ureteropelvic junction obstruction? Urology. 2012; 79:321–325.
20. Rosen S, Peters CA, Chevalier RL, Huang WY. The kidney in congenital ureteropelvic junction obstruction: a spectrum from normal to nephrectomy. J Urol. 2008; 179:1257–1263.