J Korean Foot Ankle Soc.  2015 Dec;19(4):151-155. 10.14193/jkfas.2015.19.4.151.

Arthroscopic Assessment of Potential Intra-articular Ankle Injury in Treatment of Ankle Fracture

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Busan Paik Hospital, Inje University College of Medicine, Busan, Korea. ortho1@hanmail.net
  • 2Departmnt of Medicine, Recruit Training Center of the 8th Army Division, Republic of Korea Army, Korea.

Abstract

PURPOSE
The purpose of this study was to analyze the frequency and patterns of intra-articular lesions detected during ankle fracture surgery using ankle arthroscopy.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Thirty patients (31 ankles) who underwent open reduction and internal fixation combined with ankle arthroscopy for acute ankle fracture at Inje University Busan Paik Hospital from June 2011 to September 2013 were evaluated. The ankle fractures were classified according to the AO/OTA (AO Foundation and Orthopaedic Trauma Association) classification and the intraarticular injuries were identified by ankle arthroscopy. Osteochondral lesions of the talus were divided into nine subtypes based on their locations, and the ligament injuries were classified according to avulsion fracture and rupture.
RESULTS
Using arthroscopy, abnormality in the distal tibiofibular ligament was found in 21 cases and osteochondral lesions and defects of the talus larger than 5 mm were detected in 26 cases. Among ligament injuries, anterior inferior tibio-fibular ligament injury was found in 14 cases, posterior inferior tibio-fibular ligament injury was found in two cases, deep deltoid ligament injury was found in three cases, and deep transverse tibio-fibular ligament injury was found in five cases. The locations of the osteochondral lesions were on the antero-lateral, antero-medial, centro-medial, centro-central, centro-lateral, and postero-lateral talus in 11, one, two, one, two, and nine cases, respectively.
CONCLUSION
With early diagnosis and treatment arthroscopy performed at the time of intra-articular fracture surgery is expected to result in a good outcome.

Keyword

Fracture; Injury; Arthroscopy; Ankle

MeSH Terms

Ankle Fractures*
Ankle Injuries*
Ankle*
Arthroscopy
Busan
Classification
Early Diagnosis
Humans
Intra-Articular Fractures
Ligaments
Rupture
Talus

Figure

  • Figure 1. This figure shows fracture cases classified by the AO/OTA (AO Foundation and Orthopaedic Trauma Association) fracture classification. A3: infrasyndesmotic lesions with posteromedial fracture, B1: insolated trans-syndesmotic fibular fracture, B2: trans-syndesmotic fibular fracture with medial lesions, B3: trans-syndesmotic fibular fracture with medial lesions and a Volkmann, C2: suprasyndesmotic lesions with fibular diaphyseal fracture, multifragmentary, C3: suprasyndesmotic lesions with proximal fibular lesion.

  • Figure 2. Syndesmotic instability was found during arthroscopy of patient with right ankle Maisonneuve fracture. Fi: fibula, Ta: talus.

  • Figure 3. (A) Ruptured deep deltoid ligament and widened medial clear space were found during arthroscopy of patients with pronated-external rotated II ankle fracture. (B) Reduced gaps of the medial clear space and fracture site were observed after open reduction and internal fixation. MM: medial malleolus.

  • Figure 4. (A) Osteochondral lesion was seen at the medial talar dome during arthroscopy of patients with right ankle fracture and dislocation. (B) Cleared margin of cartilage was seen after debridement of osteochondral lesion. (C) Microfracture procedure was performed for osteochondral lesion during arthroscopy. Ta: talus.


Reference

References

1. Loren GJ, Ferkel RD. Arthroscopic assessment of occult intraarticular injury in acute ankle fractures. Arthroscopy. 2002; 18:412–21.
Article
2. Thomas B, Yeo JM, Slater GL. Chronic pain after ankle fracture: an arthroscopic assessment case series. Foot Ankle Int. 2005; 26:1012–6.
Article
3. Thordarson DB, Bains R, Shepherd LE. The role of ankle arthroscopy on the surgical management of ankle fractures. Foot Ankle Int1. 2001; 22:123–5.
Article
4. Harper MC. Ankle fracture classification systems: a case for integration of the Lauge-Hansen and AO-Danis-Weber schemes. Foot Ankle. 1992; 13:404–7.
Article
5. Lauge-Hansen N. Ligamentous ankle fractures; diagnosis and treatment. Acta Chir Scand. 1949; 97:544–50.
6. de Leeuw PA, van Sterkenburg MN, van Dijk CN. Arthroscopy and endoscopy of the ankle and hindfoot. Sports Med Arthrosc. 2009; 17:175–84.
Article
7. Sung KS. Ankle arthroscopy: anatomy, portals and instrument. J Korean Foot Ankle Soc. 2012; 16:1–8.
8. Chu IT, Kim YS, Yoo SH, Oh IS. The incidences and locations of osteochondral lesions of the talus in ankle fracture. J Korean Orthop Assoc. 2004; 39:494–7.
Article
9. Boraiah S, Paul O, Parker RJ, Miller AN, Hentel KD, Lorich DG. Osteochondral lesions of talus associated with ankle fractures. Foot Ankle Int. 2009; 30:481–5.
Article
10. Hintermann B, Regazzoni P, Lampert C, Stutz G, Gächter A. Arthroscopic findings in acute fractures of the ankle. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2000; 82:345–51.
Article
11. Stufkens SA, Knupp M, Horisberger M, Lampert C, Hintermann B. Cartilage lesions and the development of osteoarthritis after internal fixation of ankle fractures: a prospective study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2010; 92:279–86.
12. Taga I, Shino K, Inoue M, Nakata K, Maeda A. Articular cartilage lesions in ankles with lateral ligament injury. An arthroscopic study. Am J Sports Med. 1993; 21:120–7.
13. Bauer M, Bergström B, Hemborg A, Sandegård J. Malleolar fractures: nonoperative versus operative treatment. A controlled study. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1985; 199:17–27.
14. Cedell CA. Supination-outward rotation injuries of the ankle: a clinical and roentgenological study with special reference to the operative treatment. Acta Orthop Scand. 1967; 38(Suppl 110):1–148.
Article
15. Hughes JL, Weber H, Willenegger H, Kuner EH. Evaluation of ankle fractures: nonoperative and operative treatment. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1979; 138:111–9.
16. Klossner O. Late results of operative and nonoperative treatment of severe ankle fractures. A clinical study. Acta Chir Scand Suppl. 1962; (Suppl 293):1–93.
17. Choi GW, Choi WJ, Lee JW. Ankle impingement syndrome. J Korean Foot Ankle Soc. 2012; 16:19–25.
18. Sorrento DL, Mlodzienski A. Incidence of lateral talar dome lesions in SER IV ankle fractures. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2000; 39:354–8.
Article
19. Takao M, Ochi M, Naito K, Uchio Y, Kono T, Oae K. Arthroscopic drilling for chondral, subchondral, and combined chondral-subchondral lesions of the talar dome. Arthroscopy. 2003; 19:524–30.
Article
20. Utsugi K, Sakai H, Hiraoka H, Yashiki M, Mogi H. Intra-articular fibrous tissue formation following ankle fracture: the significance of arthroscopic debridement of fibrous tissue. Arthros-copy. 2007; 23:89–93.
Article
Full Text Links
  • JKFAS
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr