1. Cohen S, Burns R. Pathways of the pulp. 1994. 6th ed. St. Louis: CV Mosby;179–218.
2. Gambarini G. Shaping and cleaning the root canal system: A scanning electron microscopic evaluation of a new instrumentation and irrigation technique. J Endod. 1999. 25(12):800–803.
Article
3. Siqueira JF Jr, Rocas IN, Snatos SR, Lima KC, Magalhaes FA, Uzeda M. Efficacy of instrumentation techniques and irrigation regimens in reducing the bacterial population within root canals. J Endod. 2002. 28(3):181–184.
Article
4. Hoen MM, LaBounty GL, Struttmatter EJ. Conservative treatment of persistent periradicular lesions using aspiration and irrigation. J Endod. 1990. 16(4):182–186.
Article
5. Jeansonne MJ, White RR. A comparison of 2.0% chlorhexidine gluconate and 5.25% sodium hypochlorite as antimicrobial endodontic irrigants. J Endod. 1994. 20(6):276–278.
Article
6. Valera MC, Rego JM, Jorge AOC. Effect of sodium hypochlorite and five intracanal medicants on candida albicans in root canals. J Endod. 2001. 27(6):401–403.
Article
7. Doğan H, Calt S. Effects of chelating agents and sodium hypochlorite on mineral content of root dentin. J Endod. 2001. 27(9):578–580.
Article
8. Kuruvilla JR, Kamath MP. Antimicrobial activity of 2.5% sodium hypochlorite and 0.2% chlorhexidine gluconate separately and combined, as endodontic irrignats. J Endod. 1998. 24(7):472–476.
Article
9. Scelza MF, Antoniazzi JH, Scelza P. Efficacy of final irrigation-a scanning electron microscopic Evaluation. J Endod. 2000. 26(6):355–358.
Article
10. Siqueira JF Jr, Machado AG, Silveira RM, Lopes HP, Uzeda MD. Evaluation of the effectiveness of sodium hypochlorite used with three irrigation methods in the elimination of enterococcus faecalis from the root canal, in vitro. Int Endod J. 1997. 30:279–282.
Article
11. Siqueira JF Jr, Rocas IN, Favieri A, Lima KC. Chemomechanical reduction of the bacterial population in the root canal after instrumentation and irrigation with 1%, 2.5%, and 5.25% sodium hypochlorite. J Endod. 2000. 26(6):331–334.
Article
12. Tanomaru Filho M, Leonardo MR, Silva LAB. Effect of irrigating solution and calcium hydroxide root canal dressing on the repair of apical and periapical tissues of teeth with periapical lesion. J Endod. 2002. 28(4):295–299.
Article
13. Hülsmann M, Hahn W. Complications during root canal irrigation-literature review and case reports. Int Endod J. 2000. 33:186–193.
Article
14. Sukawat C, Srisuwan T. A comparison of the antimicrobial efficacy of three calcium hydroxide formulations on human dentin infected with Enterococcus faecalis. J Endod. 2002. 28(2):102–104.
Article
15. Siqueira JF Jr, Rocas IN, Magalhaes FA, de Uzeda M. Antifungal effects of endodontic medicaments. Aust Endod J. 2001. 27(3):112–114.
Article
16. Peters LB, Winkelhoff AJ, Buijs JF, Wesselink PR. Effects of instrumentation, irrigation and dressing with calcium hydroxide on infection in pulpless teeth with periapical bone lesions. Int Endod J. 2002. 35:13–21.
Article
17. Ferguson JW, Hatton JF, Gillespie MJ. Effectiveness of intracanal irrigants and medications against the yeast Candida albicans. J Endod. 2002. 28(2):68–71.
Article
18. Goldberg F, Artaza LP, De S. Influence of calcium hydroxide dressing on the obturation of simulated lateral canals. J Endod. 2002. 28(2):99–101.
Article
19. Miletić I, Ribaric SP, Karlovic Z, Jukic S, Bosnjak A, Anic I. Apical leakage of five root canal sealers after one year of storage. J Endod. 2002. 28(6):431–432.
Article
20. Murray PE, Hafez AA, Smith AJ, Cox CF. Bacterial microleakage and pulp inflammation associated with various restorative materials. Dent Mater. 2002. 18(6):470–478.
Article
21. Lee KW, Willams MC, Camps JJ, Pashley DH. Adhesion of endodontic sealers to dentin and gutta-percha. J Endod. 2002. 28(10):684–688.
Article
22. Siqueira JF Jr, Lima KC, Magalhaes FA, Lopes HP, Uzeda M. Mechanical reduction of the bacterial population in the root canal by three instrumentation techniques. J Endod. 1999. 25(5):332–335.
Article
23. Pataky L, Ivanyi I, Grigar A, Fazekas A. antimicrobial efficacy of various root canal preparation techniques: an in vitro comparative study. J Endod. 2002. 28(8):603–605.
Article
24. Coldero LG, McHugh S, MacKenzie D, Saunders WP. Peduction in intracanal bacteria during root canal preparation with and without apical enlargement. Int Endod J. 2002. 35:437–446.
Article
25. Lim SS. Clinical Endodontology. 1999. 2nd ed. Seoul: Uichihaksa;137–141.
26. Baumgartner JC, Cuenin PR. Efficacy of several concentrations of sodium hypochlorite for root canal irrigation. J Endod. 1992. 18(12):605–612.
Article
27. Haikel Y, Gorce F, Allemann C, Voegel JC. In vitro efficiency of endodontic irrigation solutions on protein desorption. Int Endod J. 1994. 27:16–20.
Article
28. Shuping GB, Orstavik MD, Sigurdsson A, Trope M. Reduction of intracanal bacteria using nickel titanium rotary instrumentation and various medications. J Endod. 2000. 26(12):751–755.
Article
29. Almyroudi A, Mackenzie D, McHugh S, Saunders WP. The effectiveness of various disinfectants used as endodontic intracanal medications: an in vitro study. J Endod. 2002. 28(3):163–167.
Article
30. Andreasen JO, Farik B, Munksgaard EC. Long-term calcium hydroxide as a root canal dressing may increase risk of root fracture. Dent Traumatol. 2002. 18(3):134–137.
Article
31. Dalton BC, Phillips C, Pettiette M, Trope M. Bacterial reduction with nickel-titanium rotary instrumentation. J Endod. 1998. 24(11):763–767.
Article
32. Evans GE, Speight PM, Gulabivala K. The influence of preparation technique and sodium hypochlorite on removal of pulp and predentine from root canals of posterior teeth. Int Endod J. 2001. 34:322–330.
Article
33. Heard F, Walton RE. Scanning electron microscope study comparing four root canal preparation techniques in small curved canals. Int Endod J. 1997. 30:323–331.
Article
34. Hinrichs RE, Walker WA, Schindler WG. A comparison of amounts of extruded debris using handpiece-driven nickel-titanium instrument systems. J Endod. 1998. 24:102–106.
Article
35. Peters OA, Barbakow F. Effects of irrigation on debris and smear layer on canal walls prepared by two rotary techniques: a scanning electron microscopic study. J Endod. 2000. 26(1):6–10.
Article
36. Lambrianidis T, Tosounidou DE, Tzoanopoulou M. The effect of maintaining apical patency on periapical extrusion. J Endod. 2001. 27:696–698.
Article
37. Williams CE, Reid JS, Sharkey SW, Saunders WP. In-vitro measurement of apically extruded irrigant in primary molars. Int Endod J. 1995. 28:221–225.
Article
38. Bradford CE, Eleazer PD, Downs KE, Scheetz JP. Apical pressures developed by needles for canal irrigation. J Endod. 2002. 28:333–335.
Article
39. Brown DC, Moore BK, Brown CE, Newton CW. An in vitro study of apical extrusion of sodium hypochlorite during endodontic canal preparation. J Endod. 1995. 21(12):587–591.
Article
40. Kahn FH, Rosenberg PA, Gliksberg J. An in vitro evaluation of the irrigating characteristics of ultrasonic and subsonic handpieces and irrigating needles and probes. J Endod. 1995. 21(5):277–280.
Article