Korean J Obstet Gynecol.  2012 May;55(5):325-331. 10.5468/KJOG.2012.55.5.325.

Single port access versus conventional laparoscopic ovarian cystectomy: Comparison of surgical outcomes

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, CHA Gangnam Medical Center, CHA University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea. sjseongcheil@yahoo.co.kr
  • 2Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, CHA Daegu Women's Medical Center, CHA University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.

Abstract


OBJECTIVE
This study was conducted to compare the surgical outcomes between single-port access (SPA) and conventional laparoscopic ovarian cystectomy.
METHODS
This retrospective, matched case-control study was performed in 84 cases, who underwent SPA laparoscopic ovarian cystectomy (cases: 28) by a single surgeon and conventional laparoscopic ovarian cystectomy (control: 56) by another surgeon who had similar surgical skill at our hospital between January 2010 and July 2011.
RESULTS
All procedures were performed successfully in both groups without conversion to explo-laparotomy. There was no significant difference in demographic characteristics including size of ovarian cysts, estimated blood loss (EBL), operation time, hemoglobin change, postoperative hospital stay and number of patients needed extra anti-inflammatory drugs between two groups. Analysis according to the type of cysts, median EBL (30 mL vs. 100 mL, P = 0.017) was higher in conventional group and operation time (40 minutes vs. 60 minutes, P = 0.004) was also longer in conventional group in case of endometrioma. The EBL, median operation time and postoperative hospital days were similar in both group, but median hemoglobin change was less in conventional group (2.3 g/dL vs. 1.4 g/dL, P = 0.002) in mature cystic teratoma patients. There were no significant difference of surgical outcomes in others group.
CONCLUSION
SPA laparoscopic ovarian cystectomy using conventional laparoscopic instruments is feasible, effective and reliable technique, which can substitute conventional laparoscopy.

Keyword

Single port access; Laparoscopy; Ovarian cyst; Cystectomy

MeSH Terms

Case-Control Studies
Cystectomy
Endometriosis
Female
Hemoglobins
Humans
Laparoscopy
Length of Stay
Ovarian Cysts
Retrospective Studies
Teratoma
Hemoglobins

Figure

  • Fig. 1 Set up of single port access.

  • Fig. 2 Postoperative finding of umbilical scar's. (A) Preoperative and (B) postoperative (4 weeks later) finding.


Reference

1. Hilger WS, Magrina JF, Magtibay PM. Laparoscopic management of the adnexal mass. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2006. 49:535–548.
2. Canis M, Mage G, Pouly JL, Wattiez A, Manhes H, Bruhat MA. Laparoscopic diagnosis of adnexal cystic masses: a 12-year experience with long-term follow-up. Obstet Gynecol. 1994. 83:707–712.
3. Parker WH, Berek JS. Management of selected cystic adnexal masses in postmenopausal women by operative laparoscopy: a pilot study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1990. 163:1574–1577.
4. Yuen PM, Yu KM, Yip SK, Lau WC, Rogers MS, Chang A. A randomized prospective study of laparoscopy and laparotomy in the management of benign ovarian masses. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1997. 177:109–114.
5. Eltabbakh GH, Charboneau AM, Eltabbakh NG. Laparoscopic surgery for large benign ovarian cysts. Gynecol Oncol. 2008. 108:72–76.
6. Kommu SS, Kaouk JH, Rané A. Laparo-endoscopic single-site surgery: preliminary advances in renal surgery. BJU Int. 2009. 103:1034–1037.
7. Mostafa G, Matthews BD, Sing RF, Kercher KW, Heniford BT. Mini-laparoscopic versus laparoscopic approach to appendectomy. BMC Surg. 2001. 1:4.
8. Bisgaard T, Klarskov B, Trap R, Kehlet H, Rosenberg J. Microlaparoscopic vs conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a prospective randomized double-blind trial. Surg Endosc. 2002. 16:458–464.
9. Capar M, Balci O, Acar A, Colakoglu MC. Management of ovarian cysts by laparoscopic extracorporeal approach using single ancillary trocar. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol. 2009. 48:380–384.
10. Pelosi MA, Pelosi MA 3rd. Laparoscopic hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy using a single umbilical puncture. N J Med. 1991. 88:721–726.
11. Fader AN, Levinson KL, Gunderson CC, Winder AD, Escobar PF. Laparoendoscopic single-site surgery in gynaecology: a new frontier in minimally invasive surgery. J Minim Access Surg. 2011. 7:71–77.
12. Im KS, Koo YJ, Kim JB, Kwon YS. Laparoendoscopic single-site surgery versus conventional laparoscopic surgery for adnexal tumors: a comparison of surgical outcomes and postoperative pain outcomes. Kaohsiung J Med Sci. 2011. 27:91–95.
13. Lee YY, Kim TJ, Kim CJ, Park HS, Choi CH, Lee JW, et al. Single port access laparoscopic adnexal surgery versus conventional laparoscopic adnexal surgery: a comparison of peri-operative outcomes. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2010. 151:181–184.
14. Fagotti A, Fanfani F, Marocco F, Rossitto C, Gallotta V, Scambia G. Laparoendoscopic single-site surgery (LESS) for ovarian cyst enucleation: report of first 3 cases. Fertil Steril. 2009. 92:1168.e13-6.
15. Jacobeus HC. Kurze ubersicht uber meine erfahrungen mit der laparoskopie. Munch Med Wschr. 1911. 58:2017–2019.
16. Shapiro HI, Adler DH. Excision of an ectopic pregnancy through the laparoscope. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1973. 117:290–291.
17. Lee NJ, Kim J, Lee SH, Choi WM, Lee SS, Kwon YI, et al. A clinical study on 1594 cases of operative and diagnostic laparoscopy. Korean J Obstet Gynecol. 2003. 46:2189–2196.
18. Wheeless CR Jr, Thompson BH. Laparoscopic sterilization. Review of 3600 cases. Obstet Gynecol. 1973. 42:751–758.
19. Fader AN, Rojas-Espaillat L, Ibeanu O, Grumbine FC, Escobar PF. Laparoendoscopic single-site surgery (LESS) in gynecology: a multi-institutional evaluation. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2010. 203:501.e1-6.
20. Kim YW, Park BJ, Ro DY, Kim TE, Jung JK. Comparison of single-port transumbilical laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy (SPLAVH) and laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy (LAVH). J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2009. 16:S103–S157.
21. Kosumi T, Kubota A, Usui N, Yamauchi K, Yamasaki M, Oyanagi H. Laparoscopic ovarian cystectomy using a single umbilical puncture method. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2001. 11:63–65.
22. Fagotti A, Bottoni C, Vizzielli G, Alletti SG, Scambia G, Marana E, et al. Postoperative pain after conventional laparoscopy and laparoendoscopic single site surgery (LESS) for benign adnexal disease: a randomized trial. Fertil Steril. 2011. 96:255–259.e2.
Full Text Links
  • KJOG
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr