Obstet Gynecol Sci.  2014 Sep;57(5):379-385. 10.5468/ogs.2014.57.5.379.

Two-port access versus four-port access laparoscopic ovarian cystectomy

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Chungnam National University School of Medicine, Daejeon, Korea. oldfox@cnuh.co.kr

Abstract


OBJECTIVE
This study was conducted to compare the surgical outcomes between two-port access and four-port access laparoscopic ovarian cystectomy.
METHODS
Four hundred and eighty nine patients who had received two-port access laparoscopic ovarian cystectomy (n=175) and four-port access laparoscopic ovarian cystectomy (n=314) in Chungnam National University Hospital from January 2009 to August 2012 were analyzed retrospectively. The data were compared between the bilaterality of the cysts and cyst diameter of less than 6 cm and 6 cm or more.
RESULTS
There were no significant differences in patient's age, parity, body weight, body mass index and history of previous surgery between the two-port and four-port access laparoscopy group. Bilaterality of ovarian cysts was more in fourport access laparoscopy group (13.7% vs. 32.5%, P=0.000). There were no significant differences in operation time, hemoglobin change, hospital stay, adhesiolysis, transfusion, and insertion of hemo-vac between the two-port and four-port access laparoscopy group for size matched compare. However additional analgesics were more in four-port access laparoscopy group for unilateral ovarian cystectomy.
CONCLUSION
Two-port access laparoscopic surgery was feasible and safe for unilateral and bilateral ovarian cystectomy compare with four-port access laparoscopic surgery.

Keyword

Cystectomy; Ovarian cysts; Two-port access laparoscopy

MeSH Terms

Analgesics
Body Mass Index
Body Weight
Chungcheongnam-do
Cystectomy*
Female
Humans
Laparoscopy
Length of Stay
Ovarian Cysts
Parity
Retrospective Studies
Analgesics

Reference

1. Hilger WS, Magrina JF, Magtibay PM. Laparoscopic management of the adnexal mass. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2006; 49:535–548.
2. Eltabbakh GH, Charboneau AM, Eltabbakh NG. Laparoscopic surgery for large benign ovarian cysts. Gynecol Oncol. 2008; 108:72–76.
3. Capar M, Balci O, Acar A, Colakoglu MC. Management of ovarian cysts by laparoscopic extracorporeal approach using single ancillary trocar. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol. 2009; 48:380–384.
4. Shapiro HI, Adler DH. Excision of an ectopic pregnancy through the laparoscope. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1973; 117:290–291.
5. Lee NJ, Kim J, Lee SH, Choi WM, Lee SS, Kwon YI, et al. A clinical study on 1594 cases of operative and diagnostic laparoscopy. Korean J Obstet Gynecol. 2003; 46:2189–2196.
6. Podolsky ER, Rottman SJ, Poblete H, King SA, Curcillo PG. Single port access (SPA) cholecystectomy: a completely transumbilical approach. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2009; 19:219–222.
7. Canes D, Desai MM, Aron M, Haber GP, Goel RK, Stein RJ, et al. Transumbilical single-port surgery: evolution and current status. Eur Urol. 2008; 54:1020–1029.
8. Kommu SS, Kaouk JH, Rane A. Laparo-endoscopic single-site surgery: preliminary advances in renal surgery. BJU Int. 2009; 103:1034–1037.
9. Canes D, Berger A, Aron M, Brandina R, Goldfarb DA, Shoskes D, et al. Laparo-endoscopic single site (LESS) versus standard laparoscopic left donor nephrectomy: matched-pair comparison. Eur Urol. 2010; 57:95–101.
10. Wheeless CR Jr, Thompson BH. Laparoscopic sterilization: review of 3600 cases. Obstet Gynecol. 1973; 42:751–758.
11. Pelosi MA, Pelosi MA 3rd. Laparoscopic hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy using a single umbilical puncture. N J Med. 1991; 88:721–726.
12. Fader AN, Rojas-Espaillat L, Ibeanu O, Grumbine FC, Escobar PF. Laparoendoscopic single-site surgery (LESS) in gynecology: a multi-institutional evaluation. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2010; 203:501.e1–501.e6.
13. Kim YW, Park BJ, Ro DY, Kim TE. Single-port laparoscopic myomectomy using a new single-port transumbilical morcellation system: initial clinical study. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2010; 17:587–592.
14. Kim TJ, Lee YY, Kim MJ, Kim CJ, Kang H, Choi CH, et al. Single port access laparoscopic adnexal surgery. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2009; 16:612–615.
15. Paek J, Nam EJ, Kim YT, Kim SW. Overcoming technical difficulties with single-port access laparoscopic surgery in gynecology: using conventional laparoscopic instruments. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2011; 21:137–141.
16. Kim ML, Song T, Seong SJ, Yoon BS, Joo WD, Jung YW, et al. Comparison of single-port, two-port and four-port laparoscopic surgery for cyst enucleation in benign ovarian cysts. Gynecol Obstet Invest. 2013; 76:57–63.
Full Text Links
  • OGS
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr