Korean J Pain.  2014 Apr;27(2):139-144. 10.3344/kjp.2014.27.2.139.

Epidural Infusion of Morphine and Levobupivacaine through a Subcutaneous Port for Cancer Pain Management

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Chonnam National University Medical School, Gwangju, Korea. kimwm@chonnam.ac.kr

Abstract

BACKGROUND
To manage intractable cancer pain, an alternative to systemic analgesics is neuraxial analgesia. In long-term treatment, intrathecal administration could provide a more satisfactory pain relief with lower doses of analgesics and fewer side-effects than that of epidural administration. However, implantable drug delivery systems using intrathecal pumps in Korea are very expensive. Considering cost-effectiveness, we performed epidural analgesia as an alternative to intrathecal analgesia.
METHODS
We retrospectively investigated the efficacy, side effects, and complications of epidural morphine and local anesthetic administration through epidural catheters connected to a subcutaneous injection port in 29 Korean terminal cancer patients. Patient demographic data, the duration of epidural administration, preoperative numerical pain rating scales (NRS), side effects and complications related to the epidural catheterization and the drugs, and the numerical pain rating scales on the 1st, 3rd, 7th and 30th postoperative days were determined from the medical records.
RESULTS
The average score for the numerical pain rating scales for the 29 patients decreased from 7 +/- 1.0 at baseline to 3.6 +/- 1.4 on postoperative day 1 (P < 0.001). A similar decrease in pain intensity was maintained for 30 days (P < 0.001). Nausea and vomiting were the most frequently reported side effects of the epidural analgesia and two patients (6.9%) experienced paresthesia.
CONCLUSIONS
Epidural morphine and local anesthetic infusion with a subcutaneous pump seems to have an acceptable risk-benefit ratio and allows a high degree of autonomy to patients with cancer pain.

Keyword

cancer pain; efficacy; epidural catheter; port; side effects

MeSH Terms

Analgesia
Analgesia, Epidural
Analgesics
Catheterization
Catheters
Drug Delivery Systems
Humans
Injections, Subcutaneous
Korea
Medical Records
Morphine*
Nausea
Pain Management*
Paresthesia
Retrospective Studies
Vomiting
Weights and Measures
Analgesics
Morphine

Figure

  • Fig. 1 Epidural port with connection site.

  • Fig. 2 Numeric rating scale at base-line and at the follow-up visits. The values are expressed as the means ± SD. Significant decreases in numeric rating scale were observed on postoperative days to baseline. *P < 0.05 compared to baseline using the Wilcoxon signed-ranks test.


Cited by  1 articles

Anatomic Variations of Cervical and High Thoracic Ligamentum Flavum
Sang Pil Yoon, Hyun Jung Kim, Yun Suk Choi
Korean J Pain. 2014;27(4):321-325.    doi: 10.3344/kjp.2014.27.4.321.


Reference

1. Nordberg G. Epidural versus intrathecal route of opioid administration. Int Anesthesiol Clin. 1986; 24:93–111. PMID: 2872171.
Article
2. Morgan M. The rational use of intrathecal and extradural opioids. Br J Anaesth. 1989; 63:165–188. PMID: 2669907.
Article
3. Nitescu P, Appelgren L, Linder LE, Sjöberg M, Hultman E, Curelaru I. Epidural versus intrathecal morphine-bupivacaine: assessment of consecutive treatments in advanced cancer pain. J Pain Symptom Manage. 1990; 5:18–26. PMID: 2324557.
Article
4. Crul BJ, Delhaas EM. Technical complications during long-term subarachnoid or epidural administration of morphine in terminally ill cancer patients: a review of 140 cases. Reg Anesth. 1991; 16:209–213. PMID: 1911496.
5. Kim JH, Jung JY, Cho MS. Continuous intrathecal morphine administration for cancer pain management using an intrathecal catheter connected to a subcutaneous injection port: a retrospective analysis of 22 terminal cancer patients in Korean population. Korean J Pain. 2013; 26:32–38. PMID: 23342205.
Article
6. Aldrete JA. Intrathecal opioid infusions. Anesthesiology. 2004; 101:256. PMID: 15220803.
Article
7. Krames ES. Intraspinal opioid therapy for chronic nonmalignant pain: current practice and clinical guidelines. J Pain Symptom Manage. 1996; 11:333–352. PMID: 8935137.
Article
8. Nitescu P, Sjöberg M, Appelgren L, Curelaru I. Complications of intrathecal opioids and bupivacaine in the treatment of "refractory" cancer pain. Clin J Pain. 1995; 11:45–62. PMID: 7540439.
Article
9. McClellan KJ, Spencer CM. Levobupivacaine. Drugs. 1998; 56:355–362. PMID: 9777312.
Article
10. Ross VH, Pan PH, Owen MD, Seid MH, Harris L, Clyne B, et al. Neostigmine decreases bupivacaine use by patient-controlled epidural analgesia during labor: a randomized controlled study. Anesth Analg. 2009; 109:524–531. PMID: 19377050.
Article
11. Du Pen SL, Peterson DG, Williams A, Bogosian AJ. Infection during chronic epidural catheterization: diagnosis and treatment. Anesthesiology. 1990; 73:905–909. PMID: 2240680.
12. Smitt PS, Tsafka A, Teng-van de, van der Holt R, Elswijk-de Vries I, Elfrink E, et al. Outcome and complications of epidural analgesia in patients with chronic cancer pain. Cancer. 1998; 83:2015–2022. PMID: 9806662.
Article
13. Maki DG, Ringer M, Alvarado CJ. Prospective randomised trial of povidone-iodine, alcohol, and chlorhexidine for prevention of infection associated with central venous and arterial catheters. Lancet. 1991; 338:339–343. PMID: 1677698.
Article
14. De Cicco M, Matovic M, Castellani GT, Basaglia G, Santini G, Del Pup C, et al. Time-dependent efficacy of bacterial filters and infection risk in long-term epidural catheterization. Anesthesiology. 1995; 82:765–771. PMID: 7533485.
Article
15. Waghorn DJ. Intravascular device-associated systemic infections: a 2 year analysis of cases in a district general hospital. J Hosp Infect. 1994; 28:91–101. PMID: 7844353.
Article
16. de Jong PC, Kansen PJ. A comparison of epidural catheters with or without subcutaneous injection ports for treatment of cancer pain. Anesth Analg. 1994; 78:94–100. PMID: 8267188.
Article
17. Carde P, Cosset-Delaigue MF, Laplanche A, Chareau I. Classical external indwelling central venous catheter versus totally implanted venous access systems for chemotherapy administration: a randomized trial in 100 patients with solid tumors. Eur J Cancer Clin Oncol. 1989; 25:939–944. PMID: 2666137.
Article
18. Orser B. Obstetrical epidural anaesthesia in a Canadian outpost hospital. Can J Anaesth. 1988; 35:503–506. PMID: 3168135.
Article
19. Prince G, McGregor D. Obstetric epidural test doses. A reappraisal. Anaesthesia. 1986; 41:1240–1250. PMID: 3544942.
20. Guay J. The epidural test dose: a review. Anesth Analg. 2006; 102:921–929. PMID: 16492853.
Article
21. de Leon-Casasola OA. Interventional procedures for cancer pain management: when are they indicated? Cancer Invest. 2004; 22:630–642. PMID: 15565820.
Article
22. Bedder MD, Burchiel K, Larson A. Cost analysis of two implantable narcotic delivery systems. J Pain Symptom Manage. 1991; 6:368–373. PMID: 1908884.
Article
23. Harney D, Victor R. Traumatic syrinx after implantation of an intrathecal catheter. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2004; 29:606–609. PMID: 15635521.
Article
24. Schimpf J, Krakow K, Vehreschild N, Pohlmann-Eden B. Transverse myelopathy as a complication following long-term intrathecal application of morphine in chronic back pain. Anasthesiol Intensivmed Notfallmed Schmerzther. 1999; 34:506–509. PMID: 10494374.
Article
Full Text Links
  • KJP
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr