Korean J Pain.  2011 Jun;24(2):81-86. 10.3344/kjp.2011.24.2.81.

Value of Bone Scintigraphy and Single Photon Emission Computed Tomography (SPECT) in Lumbar Facet Disease and Prediction of Short-term Outcome of Ultrasound Guided Medial Branch Block with Bone SPECT

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan, College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea. koh521@hanmail.net

Abstract

BACKGROUND
Facet joint disease plays a major role in axial low-back pain. Few diagnostic tests and imaging methods for identifying this condition exist. Single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) is reported that it has a high sensitivity and specificity in diagnosing facet disease. We prospectively evaluated the use of bone scintigraphy with SPECT for the identification of patients with low back pain who would benefit from medial branch block.
METHODS
SPECT was performed on 33 patients clinically suspected of facet joint disease. After SPECT, an ultrasound guided medial branch block was performed on all patients. On 28 SPECT-positive patients, medial branch block was performed based on the SPECT findings. On 5 negative patients, medial branch block was performed based on clinical findings. For one month, we evaluated the patients using the visual analogue scale (VAS) and Oswestry disability index. SigmaStat and paired t-tests were used to analyze patient data and compare results.
RESULTS
Of the 33 patients, the ones who showed more than 50% reduction in VAS score were assigned 'responders'. SPECT positive patients showed a better response to medial branch blocks than negative patients, but no changes in the Oswestry disability index were seen.
CONCLUSIONS
SPECT is a sensitive tool for the identification of facet joint disease and predicting the response to medial branch block.

Keyword

facet; medial branch block; SPECT

MeSH Terms

Diagnostic Tests, Routine
Humans
Low Back Pain
Prospective Studies
Sensitivity and Specificity
Tomography, Emission-Computed, Single-Photon
Zygapophyseal Joint

Figure

  • Fig. 1 (A) Negative planar bone scintigraphy. (B) Positive planar bone scintigraphy.

  • Fig. 2 VAS and Oswestry disability index changes in patients whom are suspected facet disease (*means P value < 0.05).


Cited by  1 articles

Ultrasound Sonography at the Pain Clinic in Korea: Past, Present and Future
Ji Yong Park
Korean J Pain. 2013;26(1):1-2.    doi: 10.3344/kjp.2013.26.1.1.


Reference

1. Eisenstein SM, Parry CR. The lumbar facet arthrosis syndrome. Clinical presentation and articular surface changes. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1987; 69:3–7. PMID: 2950102.
Article
2. Cohen SP, Raja SN. Pathogenesis, diagnosis, and treatment of lumbar zygapophysial (facet) joint pain. Anesthesiology. 2007; 106:591–614. PMID: 17325518.
Article
3. Bogduk N. Diagnosing lumbar zygapophysial joint pain. Pain Med. 2005; 6:139–142. PMID: 15773878.
Article
4. Revel M, Poiraudeau S, Auleley GR, Payan C, Denke A, Nguyen M, et al. Capacity of the clinical picture to characterize low back pain relieved by facet joint anesthesia. Proposed criteria to identify patients with painful facet joints. Spine. 1998; 23:1972–1976. PMID: 9779530.
Article
5. Manchikanti L, Pampati V, Fellows B, Baha AG. The inability of the clinical picture to characterize pain from facet joints. Pain Physician. 2000; 3:158–166. PMID: 16906195.
6. Schwarzer AC, Wang SC, O'Driscoll D, Harrington T, Bogduk N, Laurent R. The ability of computed tomography to identify a painful zygapophysial joint in patients with chronic low back pain. Spine. 1995; 20:907–912. PMID: 7644955.
Article
7. Carrino JA, Lurie JD, Tosteson AN, Tosteson TD, Carragee EJ, Kaiser J, et al. Lumbar spine: reliability of MR imaging findings. Radiology. 2009; 250:161–170. PMID: 18955509.
Article
8. Lehman RA Jr, Helgeson MD, Keeler KA, Bunmaprasert T, Riew KD. Comparison of magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography in predicting facet arthrosis in the cervical spine. Spine. 2009; 34:65–68. PMID: 19127162.
Article
9. Dolan AL, Ryan PJ, Arden NK, Stratton R, Wedley JR, Hamann W, et al. The value of SPECT scans in identifying back pain likely to benefit from facet joint injection. Br J Rheumatol. 1996; 35:1269–1273. PMID: 9010055.
Article
10. Pneumaticos SG, Chatziioannou SN, Hipp JA, Moore WH, Esses SI. Low back pain: prediction of short-term outcome of facet joint injection with bone scintigraphy. Radiology. 2006; 238:693–698. PMID: 16436824.
Article
11. Holder LE, Machin JL, Asdourian PL, Links JM, Sexton CC. Planar and high-resolution SPECT bone imaging in the diagnosis of facet syndrome. J Nucl Med. 1995; 36:37–44. PMID: 7799079.
12. Schwarzer AC, Aprill CN, Derby R, Fortin J, Kine G, Bogduk N. Clinical features of patients with pain stemming from the lumbar zygapophysial joints. Is the lumbar facet syndrome a clinical entity? Spine. 1994; 19:1132–1137. PMID: 8059268.
Article
13. Kalichman L, Li L, Kim DH, Guermazi A, Berkin V, O'Donnell CJ, et al. Facet joint osteoarthritis and low back pain in the community-based population. Spine. 2008; 33:2560–2565. PMID: 18923337.
Article
14. Manchikanti L, Pampati V, Fellows B, Bakhit CE. Prevalence of lumbar facet joint pain in chronic low back pain. Pain Physician. 1999; 2:59–64. PMID: 16906217.
Article
15. Laslett M, Oberg B, Aprill CN, McDonald B. Zygapophysial joint blocks in chronic low back pain: a test of Revel's model as a screening test. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2004; 5:43. PMID: 15546487.
Article
16. Manchikanti L, Singh V, Pampati V. Are diagnostic lumbar medial branch blocks valid? Results of 2-year follow-up. Pain Physician. 2003; 6:147–153. PMID: 16883373.
17. Manchikanti L, Pampati V, Fellows B, Bakhit CE. The diagnostic validity and therapeutic value of lumbar facet joint nerve blocks with or without adjuvant agents. Curr Rev Pain. 2000; 4:337–344. PMID: 10998741.
Article
18. Carette S, Marcoux S, Truchon R, Grondin C, Gagnon J, Allard Y, et al. A controlled trial of corticosteroid injections into facet joints for chronic low back pain. N Engl J Med. 1991; 325:1002–1007. PMID: 1832209.
Article
19. Manchikanti L, Singh V, Falco FJ, Cash KA, Pampati V. Evaluation of lumbar facet joint nerve blocks in managing chronic low back pain: a randomized, double-blind, controlled trial with a 2-year follow-up. Int J Med Sci. 2010; 7:124–135. PMID: 20567613.
Article
20. Greher M, Kirchmair L, Enna B, Kovacs P, Gustorff B, Kapral S, et al. Ultrasound-guided lumbar facet nerve block: accuracy of a new technique confirmed by computed tomography. Anesthesiology. 2004; 101:1195–1200. PMID: 15505456.
21. Greher M, Scharbert G, Kamolz LP, Beck H, Gustorff B, Kirchmair L, et al. Ultrasound-guided lumbar facet nerve block: a sonoanatomic study of a new methodologic approach. Anesthesiology. 2004; 100:1242–1248. PMID: 15114223.
22. Ha DH, Shim DM, Kim TK, Kim YM, Choi SS. Comparison of ultrasonography- and fluoroscopy-guided facet joint block in the lumbar spine. Asian Spine J. 2010; 4:15–22. PMID: 20622950.
Article
23. Stojanovic MP, Sethee J, Mohiuddin M, Cheng J, Barker A, Wang J, et al. MRI analysis of the lumbar spine: can it predict response to diagnostic and therapeutic facet procedures? Clin J Pain. 2010; 26:110–115. PMID: 20090436.
Article
24. Kaplan M, Dreyfuss P, Halbrook B, Bogduk N. The ability of lumbar medial branch blocks to anesthetize the zygapophysial joint. A physiologic challenge. Spine. 1998; 23:1847–1852. PMID: 9762741.
Article
Full Text Links
  • KJP
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr