J Korean Knee Soc.  2004 Jun;16(1):27-32.

Patellar Nonresurfacing Versus Patellar Resurfacing in Total Knee Arthroplasty

• Kim YJ
• Min HJ
• Yoon ES
• Suh JS
• Kim HS
• Heo JM

Abstract

PURPOSE: To compare the clinical, radiologic results and complications between the patellar non-resur-faced and resurfaced cases in total knee arthroplasty.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
From March 1998 to May 2003, the subjects were 37 patellar non-resurfaced and 45 patellar resurfaced cases followed up more than a year among the patients who had total knee arthroplasty in degenerative arthritis. The results were evaluated by the range of motion, Hospital for Spe-cial Surgery (HSS) knee rating score, and Laurin's and Merchant's congruence angle. Student t-test was used in statistical analysis in comparison of both groups.
RESULTS
In non-resurfaced group, the range of motion was incrased from 90.6 degree preoperatively to 108.6 degree postoperatively and HSS score from 62.6 to 84.1 respectively, while in resurfaced group, range of motion was increased from 88.2 degree preoperatively to 110.4 degree postoperatively and HSS score from 59.3 to 85.3. There were no significant differences between two groups (p>0.05). There were some patella-asso-ciated complications in each group, and revision due to patella-associated complications were 1 case (3%) and 2 cases (4%) each. So, patella-associated complications and revision rates revealed no significant dif-ferences (p>0.05).
CONCLUSION
There is no difference in the clinical results and complications between patella resurfacing and selective non-resurfacing with relatively good cartilage, More follow up is needed for the necessity of revision due to patella-associated complications.

Keyword

Knee; Total knee arthroplasty; Patellar non-resurfacing; Patellar resurfacing

MeSH Terms

Arthroplasty*
Cartilage
Follow-Up Studies
Humans
Knee*
Osteoarthritis
Patella
Range of Motion, Articular