Korean J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg.
2000 Jun;33(6):494-501.
Angiogenic Responce to Transmyocardial Mechanical Reveascularization ( TMMR )
with Polymer Myocardial Stent
- Affiliations
-
- 1Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Ajou University school of Medicine.
- 2Department of Molecular Science & Technology, Ajou University.
- 3Department of Pathology, College of Medicine, Yeonsei University.
Abstract
-
BACKGROUND: Transmyocardial laser revascularization(TMLR) for revascularizing ischemic
myocardium in patients was originally based on the assumption that laser channels remain
their patency much longer. But recent studies show that laser channels did not remain open
and that TMLR could achieve treatment benefits without long-term channel patency. The
angiongencesis is currently thought to be induced by non-specific inflammatory response
to mechanical tissue injury. This study is to evaluate hypothesis that various transmyocaridal
mechanical revascularization(TMMR) may induce the angiogenic responses similar to that seen
with TMLR, and transmyocaridal polymer stent revascularization(TMSR), the polymer stent in
the myocardial tissue is hydrolyzed in 2 weeks, may enhance the non-specific inflammatory
reaction resulting angiogenesis. Furthermore, polymer myocaridal stent channels remain
long-term patency.
MATERIAL AND METHOD: Eight domestic pigs underwent ligation of the proximal circumflex artery, and 2 weeks later they were randomized to undergo transmycardial acupunctural revascularization
(TMPR, Group I) of the left lateral wall with 18-G needle(n=2), to undergo transmyocardial
(TMDR, Group II) with industrial 2mm steel drill(n=2), to undergo transmyocardial polymer
stent revascularization (TMSR, Group III) after drilling the infarcted myocardium(n=2), the
stent is poly(lactic acid-co-glycolic acid), which is self-degradated in the myocardium, and
to a control group the ischemic zone was unterated(n=2). All the pigs were sacrificed after
4 weeks TMMR. Sections from the ischemic zone were submitted for vascular endothelial growth
factor (VEGF) ELISA and histology.
RESULT: There were makedly increase in the VEGF immunoassay in the ischemic zone of the
TMMR group compared to the ischemic zone of the control group(control: each 30.85 and
43.15pg/mg protein, TMPR: each 44.14 and 68.61 pg/mg protein, TMDR: each 65.92 and
78.65 pg/mg protein, TMSR: each 177.39 and 168.87 pg/mg protein). TMSR channels caused
greatest VEGF expression than channels made by other group and the polymer stent channels
remained vacuole after 4 weeks.
CONCLUSIONS
Transmyocardial polymer stent revascularization promoted the most angiogenci
response by the VEGF immunoassay, although our study did not show the statistical significancy. The channels remained but the flow patency was not verified. Transmyocardial polymer stent revascularization (TMSR) is desirable in future experimental trials and in view of the significant cost implications comparable to that of laser.