Skin Graft Fixation with Histoacryl Tissue Adhesive in STSG of Burn Patients

Choi, Young Hwan; Yoon, Cheon Jae; Moon, Duk Ju; Lee, Ha Guen; Cho, Jin Kyung

Abstract

PURPOSE
Comparing with suture and staple, skin graft fixation with Histoacryl (N-butyl-cyanoacrylate, B.Braun, Germany) has two advantages. Fixation is simple, painless and removal process is unnecessary. There are few reports that compare histoacryl with conventional methods for skin graft fixation in FTSG. However, there are no comparative studies in STSG. The purpose of this study is to show our experience of skin graft fixation with histoacryl in STSG of burn patients.
METHODS
This study included those who was burned less than 10% of TBSA and needed STSG. The patients who had underlying disease (DM, hypertension, liver disease, lung disease) were excluded. 29 patients who visited Bestian burn center from January to July 2009 was enrolled in the study. In STSG, skin graft was fixed with histoacryl and authors marked the fixed points with pen. Fixation rate was checked in 7 days after STSG and take rate was checked in 14 days after STSG.
RESULTS
The patient group consisted of 7 males and 22 females. The mean extent of burn area was 2.3%. The type of injury consisted of 18 contact, 8 scald, 1 flame, 2 friction. 31 STSG of 29 patients was done. STSG was done at 24th day after burn, the mean area of wound for STSG was 51 cm2. Mean numbers of fixation point with histoacryl per patients were 14.1. 430 of 436 fixation were stable and fixation rate was 98.6%. There was no infection case. Take rate was 99.1% in 14 days after STSG and it took 21 days for wound opening.
CONCLUSION
Until now, suture and staple are common methods in skin graft fixation. However, it is disadvantageous that suture and staples should be removed. Histoacryl does not need those process. This study showed that take rate was 99.1% and fixation rate was 98.6% in fixation with histoacryl. In STSG, Skin graft fixation with histoacryl could be alternative methods for suture and staple.