J Korean Androl Soc.  1995 Jan;13(1):23-26.

A clinical Experience with the Vacuum Constrictor Device in Impotence

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Urology, Korea Veterans Hospital, Seoul, Korea.
  • 2Department of Urology, Inha University, College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.

Abstract

We applied the vacuum constrictor device to 67 impotent patients, of whom 20 (29%) obtained the desirable erection. Nineteen patients used the devices for intercourse, although 12 had one or more problems with its usage: difficulty in usage (3 cases), difficulty in intercourse caused by the pivot (3 cases), cold sensation (3 cases), loosening and tearing of the ring (2 cases), penile pain caused by the ring (1 case) and skin discoloration (1 case). There were no serious ill effect from use of the device. Eleven patients (57%) were capable of ejaculation, and 12 (63%) experiences orgasms. However, the satisfaction rate of the sexual partner (31%) was low. In conclusion, the vacuum constrictor device is a good alternative therapy to surgical treatment and intracavernosal injection of vasoactive drugs in very selected patients with impotence.


MeSH Terms

Ejaculation
Erectile Dysfunction*
Humans
Male
Orgasm
Sensation
Sexual Partners
Skin
Vacuum*
Full Text Links
  • JKAS
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr