A Clinical Experience of Vacuum Tumescence Enhancement Therapy for Impotence

Min, Keon Sik; Park, Nam Cheol; Cha, Young Il; Yoon, Jong Byung

Abstract

The major role of treatment for impotence is played by vasoactive intracavernous pharmacotherapy or penile prosthesis during last decades. However, the former has a high risk of cavernosal fibrosis-and priapism, and the latter, also infection. We applied the Vacuum Constrictor Device to fifty of organic, 2 of old age, and 2 of unknown. Of 53 cases, 47 encountered the desirable erection were able to secure the vaginal penetration. Of 5 failed cases, 4 were because of maladjustment due to slim body and 1 was of pain on the pubic area due to previous old pelvic bone fracture. Of 17 cases with poor erection by vasoactive intracavernous pharmacotherapy 15 encountered good erection by means of Vacuum Constrictor Device and no significant complications were observed. Of 14 self-acquired Vacuum Constrictor Davicl which were used in which frequency of 10 to 17 times, 10 cases were shown to be satisfactory and the rest were not. Of 4 unsatisfactory cases, 2 were leakage of congested blood during intercourse, 1 was difficulty in intercourse due to pivot and the other one was of mild suprapubic pain due to previous pelvic bone fracture. Although Vacuum Temescence Enhancement Therapy is cumbersome in manipulation prior to sexual intercourse and has time limitation, it is easy to learn and has less complications than vasoactive intracavernous pharmacotherapy. Therefore Vacuum Tumescence Enhancement Therapy is thought to a preferable therapeutic alternative prior to vasoactive intracavernous pharmacotherapy and surgical treatment in impotence in spite of these disadvantages.