Hip Pelvis.  2012 Sep;24(3):245-249. 10.5371/hp.2012.24.3.245.

Antibiotic-impregnated Cement Plate for the Treatment of Infected Periprosthetic Femoral Fracture after Cementless Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Case Report

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Chung-Ang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
  • 2Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Gangnam Himchan Hospital, Seoul, Korea. osjongwoni@hotmail.com

Abstract

A 62-year-old man with an infected periprosthetic femoral fracture, which occurred after a cementless total hip arthroplasty (THA) procedure, was treated utilizing an antibiotic-impregnated cement plate for internal fixation. Open reduction and internal fixation using a cable plate were initially attempted in his case, but a deep infection with methicillin-resistant staphylococcus epidermidis at the fracture site occurred 2 months after the initial cable plate procedure. Using an antibiotic-impregnated cement plate for internal fixation, one month later, the fracture had stabilized. Successful fusion occurred at 12 months after deploying the antibiotic-impregnated cement plate. This technique was useful in this complicated case because it facilitated the goals of eradicating infection, alleviating pain, and improving function.

Keyword

Antibiotic-impregnated cement plate; Infected periprosthetic fracture; Total hip arthroplasty

MeSH Terms

Arthroplasty
Femoral Fractures
Hip
Humans
Methicillin Resistance
Middle Aged
Staphylococcus epidermidis

Figure

  • Fig. 1 Anteroposterior hip radiograph showing the Vancouver type C periprosthetic fracture without component loosening.

  • Fig. 2 Anteroposterior hip radiograph showing open reduction and internal fixation using a cable plate.

  • Fig. 3 Anteroposterior hip radiograph 3 months after the operation showing wire loosening and varus deformity.

  • Fig. 4 Intraoperative photograph showing the bony defect on the lateral wall of the femoral shaft.

  • Fig. 5 Intraoperative photograph showing antibiotic-impregnated cement and plate over a vinyl cover.

  • Fig. 6 Anteroposterior hip radiograph at 12 months after the operation showing bone union.


Reference

1. Parvizi J, Rapuri VR, Purtill JJ, Sharkey PF, Rothman RH, Hozack WJ. Treatment protocol for proximal femoral periprosthetic fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004. 86-A:Suppl 2. 8–16.
Article
2. Singh JR, Greenberg JS, Colavita P. Atypical clinical presentation of periprosthetic femur fracture after revision total hip arthroplasty. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2010. 89:772–775.
Article
3. Park SK, Kim YG, Kim SY. Treatment of periprosthetic femoral fractures in hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Surg. 2011. 3:101–106.
Article
4. Parvizi J, Vegari DN. Periprosthetic proximal femur fractures: current concepts. J Orthop Trauma. 2011. 25:Suppl 2. S77–S81.
Article
5. Berry DJ. Epidemiology: hip and knee. Orthop Clin North Am. 1999. 30:183–190.
6. Pike J, Davidson D, Garbuz D, Duncan CP, O'Brien PJ, Masri BA. Principles of treatment for periprosthetic femoral shaft fractures around well-fixed total hip arthroplasty. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2009. 17:677–688.
Article
7. Schwab JH, Pagnano M, Haidukewych GJ, Trousdale R. A technique for treating periprosthetic fractures of the femur associated with deep prosthetic infection. J Arthroplasty. 2003. 18:211–215.
Article
8. Sakai T, Ohzono K, Nakase T, Lee SB, Manaka T, Nishihara S. Treatment of periprosthetic femoral fracture after cementless total hip arthroplasty with Ilizarov external fixation. J Arthroplasty. 2007. 22:617–620.
Article
Full Text Links
  • HP
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr