Tuberc Respir Dis.  2007 Nov;63(5):405-411. 10.4046/trd.2007.63.5.405.

Applicability of American and European Spirometry Repeatability Criteria to Korean Adults

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Internal Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea. ysamkim@yuhs.ac
  • 2Department of Preventive Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
  • 3The Institute of Chest Diseases, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
  • 4Department of Internal Medicine, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
  • 5Clinical Research Center for Chronic Obstructive Airway Diseases, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to evaluate the clinical applicability of the repeatability criteria recommended by the American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society (ATS/ERS) spirometry guidelines and to determine which factors affect the repeatability of spirometry in Korean adults.
METHODS
We reviewed the spirometry data of 4,663 Korean adults from the Korean National Health and Nutritional Examination Survey (KNHANES) Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Cohort (COPD cohort) and the Community-based Cohort Study VI-Fishing village/Islands (community cohort). We measured the anthropometric factors and differences between the highest and second-highest FVC (dFVC) and FEV1 (dFEV1) from prebronchodilator spirometry. Analyses included the distribution of dFVC and dFEV1, comparison of the values meeting the 1994 ATS repeatability criteria with the values meeting the 2005 ATS/ERS repeatability criteria, and the performance of linear regression for evaluating the influence of subject characteristics and the change of criteria on the spirometric variability.
RESULTS
About 95% of subjects were able to reproduce FVC and FEV1 within 150 ml. The KNHANES based on the 1994 ATS guidelines showed poorer repeatability than the COPD cohort and community cohort based on the 2005 ATS/ERS guidelines. Demographic and anthropometric factors had little effect on repeatability, explaining only 0.5 to 3%.
CONCLUSION
We conclude that the new spirometry repeatability criteria recommended by the 2005 ATS/ERS guidelines is also applicable to Korean adults. The repeatability of spirometry depends little on individual characteristics when an experienced technician performs testing. Therefore, we suggest that sustained efforts for public awareness of new repeatability criteria, quality control of spirograms, and education of personnel are needed for reliable spirometric results.

Keyword

Spirometry; Repeatability; Quality control

MeSH Terms

Adult*
Cohort Studies
Education
Humans
Linear Models
Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive
Quality Control
Spirometry*

Reference

1. Miller MR, Hankinson J, Brusasco V, Burgos F, Casaburi R, Coates A, et al. Standardisation of spirometry. Eur Respir J. 2005. 26:319–338.
2. American Thoracic Society. Standardization of Spirometry, 1994 Update. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1995. 152:1107–1136.
3. Enright PL, Beck KC, Sherrill DL. Repeatability of spirometry in 18,000 adult patients. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2004. 169:235–238.
4. Hankinson JL, Bang KM. Acceptability and reproducibility criteria of the American Thoracic Society as observed in a sample of the general population. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1991. 143:516–521.
5. Pennock BE, Rogers RM, McCaffree DR. Changes in measured spirometric indices. What is significant? Chest. 1981. 80:97–99.
6. Bellia V, Pistelli R, Catalano F, Antonelli-Incalzi R, Grassi V, Melillo G, et al. Quality control of spirometry in the elderly. The SA.R.A. study. SAlute Respiration nell'Anziano = Respiratory Health in the Elderly. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2000. 161:1094–1100.
7. Herpel LB, Kanner RE, Lee SM, Fessler HE, Sciurba FC, Connett JE, et al. Variability of spirometry in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: results from two clinical trials. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2006. 173:1106–1113.
8. Humerfelt S, Eide GE, Kvale G, Gulsvik A. Predictors of spirometric test failure: a comparison of the 1983 and 1993 acceptability criteria from the European Community for Coal and Steel. Occup Environ Med. 1995. 52:547–553.
9. Neale AV, Demers RY. Significance of the inability to reproduce pulmonary function test results. J Occup Med. 1994. 36:660–666.
10. Enright PL, Kronmal RA, Higgins M, Schenker M, Haponik EF. Spirometry reference values for women and men 65 to 85 years of age. Cardiovascular health study. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1993. 147:125–133.
11. Enright PL, Arnold A, Manolio TA, Kuller LH. The Cardiovascular Health Study Research Group. Spirometry reference values for healthy elderly blacks. Chest. 1996. 110:1416–1424.
12. Stoller JK, Buist AS, Burrows B, Crystal RG, Fallat RJ, McCarthy K, et al. alpha1-Antitrypsin Deficiency Registry Study Group. Quality control of spirometry testing in the registry for patients with severe alpha1-antitrypsin deficiency. Chest. 1997. 111:899–909.
Full Text Links
  • TRD
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr