Chonnam Med J.  2011 Aug;47(2):80-84. 10.4068/cmj.2011.47.2.80.

Prospective Randomization Trial of G-CSF-Primed Induction Regimen versus Standard Regimen in Patients with AML

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Hematology/Oncology and Stem Cell Transplantation Unit, Kyungpook National University Hospital, Kyungpook National University School of Medicine, Daegu, Korea. sksohn@knu.ac.kr

Abstract

The sensitization of leukemia cells with hematopoietic growth factors can enhance the cytotoxicity of chemotherapy in acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Therefore, the current trial attempted to evaluate the efficacy of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) priming in remission induction chemotherapy with an intensified dose of Ara-C for newly diagnosed AML. Patients with newly diagnosed AML were randomly assigned to receive idarubicin (12 mg/m2/24 hr, days 1-3) plus Ara-C (500 mg/m2/12 hr, days 4-8) with G-CSF (250 microg/m2/d, days 3-7) (IAG group) or standard idarubicin (12 mg/m2/24 hr, days 1-3) plus Ara-C (100 mg/m2/12 hr, days 1-7) without G-CSF (IA group). There were no significant differences in sex, age, subtype, or cytogenetic risk between the two groups. Complete remission was achieved in 15 patients (88.2%) from the IAG group and in 14 patients (82.4%) from the IA group (p=0.31). The median time to complete remission was 26 vs. 31 days (p=0.779) for the IA and IAG groups, respectively. The median time to neutrophil recovery (>1x10(9)/L) and platelet recovery (>20x10(9)/L) did not differ significantly between the two groups (26 vs. 26 days, p=0.338; 21 vs. 16 days, p=0.190, respectively). After a median follow-up of 682 days, the 3-year overall survival rate for the IA group was 64.7%, whereas that for the IAG group was 45.6% (p=0.984). No improved clinical outcomes were observed for the AML patients subjected to intensified remission induction with G-CSF priming when compared with standard induction chemotherapy.

Keyword

Acute myeloid leukemia; Cytarabine; Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor; Induction of remission

MeSH Terms

Blood Platelets
Cytarabine
Cytogenetics
Follow-Up Studies
Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor
Humans
Idarubicin
Induction Chemotherapy
Intercellular Signaling Peptides and Proteins
Leukemia
Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute
Neutrophils
Prospective Studies
Random Allocation
Remission Induction
Survival Rate
Cytarabine
Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor
Idarubicin
Intercellular Signaling Peptides and Proteins

Figure

  • FIG. 1 Overall survival and event-free survival in the IA and IAG groups. IA: cytarabine plus idarubicin chemotherapy, IAG: G-CSF-primed cytarabine plus idarubicin chemotherapy. (A) The 3-year overall survival rate was 64.7±11.6% for the IA group and 45.6±13.6% for the IAG group. (B) The 3-year event-free survival rate was 64.7±11.6% for the IA group and 37.6±13.5% for the IAG group.


Reference

1. Preisler HD, Rustum Y, Henderson ES, Bjornsson S, Creaven PJ, Higby DJ, et al. Treatment of acute nonlymphocytic leukemia: use of anthracycline-cytosine arabinoside induction therapy and comparison of two maintenance regimens. Blood. 1979. 53:455–464.
Article
2. Keating MJ, Smith TL, McCredie KB, Bodey GP, Hersh EM, Gutterman JU, et al. A four-year experience with anthracycline, cytosine arabinoside, vincristine and prednisone combination chemotherapy in 325 adults with acute leukemia. Cancer. 1981. 47:2779–2788.
Article
3. Rai KR, Holland JF, Glidewell OJ, Weinberg V, Brunner K, Obrecht JP, et al. Treatment of acute myelocytic leukemia: a study by cancer and leukemia group B. Blood. 1981. 58:1203–1212.
Article
4. Ohno R, Naoe T, Kanamaru A, Yoshida M, Hiraoka A, Kobayashi T, et al. Kohseisho Leukemia Study Group. A double-blind controlled study of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor started two days before induction chemotherapy in refractory acute myeloid leukemia. Blood. 1994. 83:2086–2092.
Article
5. Zittoun R, Suciu S, Mandelli F, de Witte T, Thaler J, Stryckmans P, et al. Granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor associated with induction treatment of acute myelogenous leukemia: a randomized trial by the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Leukemia Cooperative Group. J Clin Oncol. 1996. 14:2150–2159.
Article
6. Löwenberg B, Boogaerts MA, Daenen SM, Verhoef GE, Hagenbeek A, Vellenga E, et al. Value of different modalities of granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor applied during or after induction therapy of acute myeloid leukemia. J Clin Oncol. 1997. 15:3496–3506.
Article
7. te Boekhorst PA, Löwenberg B, Vlastuin M, Sonneveld P. Enhanced chemosensitivity of clonogenic blasts from patients with acute myeloid leukemia by G-CSF, IL-3 or GM-CSF stimulation. Leukemia. 1993. 7:1191–1198.
8. Löwenberg B, van Putten W, Theobald M, Gmür J, Verdonck L, Sonneveld P, et al. Dutch-Belgian Hemato-Oncology Cooperative Group. Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research. Effect of priming with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor on the outcome of chemotherapy for acute myeloid leukemia. N Engl J Med. 2003. 349:743–752.
Article
9. Rowe JM, Neuberg D, Friedenberg W, Bennett JM, Paietta E, Makary AZ, et al. Eastern Cooperative Oncology. A phase 3 study of three induction regimens and of priming with GM-CSF in older adults with acute myeloid leukemia: a trial by the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group. Blood. 2004. 103:479–485.
Article
10. Baek JH, Sohn SK, Kim DH, Kim JG, Yang DH, Kim YK, et al. Pilot remission induction therapy with idarubicin, plus an intensified dose of ara-C and priming with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor for acute myeloid leukemia. Acta Haematol. 2007. 117:109–114.
Article
11. Cheson BD, Bennett JM, Kopecky KJ, Büchner T, Willman CL, Estey EH, et al. International Working Group for Diagnosis, Standardization of Response Criteria, Treatment Outcomes, and Reporting Standards for Therapeutic Trials in Acute Myeloid Leukemia. Revised recommendations of the International Working Group for Diagnosis, Standardization of Response Criteria, Treatment Outcomes, and Reporting Standards for Therapeutic Trials in Acute Myeloid Leukemia. J Clin Oncol. 2003. 21:4642–4649.
Article
12. Büchner T, Hiddemann W, Wörmann B, Löffler H, Gassmann W, Haferlach T, et al. Double induction strategy for acute myeloid leukemia: the effect of high-dose cytarabine with mitoxantrone instead of standard-dose cytarabine with daunorubicin and 6-thioguanine: a randomized trial by the German AML Cooperative Group. Blood. 1999. 93:4116–4124.
13. Cahn JY, Labopin M, Sierra J, Blaise D, Reiffers J, Ferrant A, et al. No impact of high-dose cytarabine on the outcome of patients transplanted for acute myeloblastic leukaemia in first remission. Acute Leukaemia Working Party of the European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT). Br J Haematol. 2000. 110:308–314.
Article
14. Amadori S, Suciu S, Jehn U, Stasi R, Thomas X, Marie JP, et al. EORTC/GIMEMA Leukemia Group. Use of glycosylated recombinant human G-CSF (lenograstim) during and/or after induction chemotherapy in patients 61 years of age and older with acute myeloid leukemia: final results of AML-13, a randomized phase-3 study. Blood. 2005. 106:27–34.
Article
15. Bishop JF, Matthews JP, Young GA, Szer J, Gillett A, Joshua D, et al. A randomized study of high-dose cytarabine in induction in acute myeloid leukemia. Blood. 1996. 87:1710–1717.
Article
Full Text Links
  • CMJ
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr