Ann Surg Treat Res.  2015 Jul;89(1):17-22. 10.4174/astr.2015.89.1.17.

The effects of ventilation with high density oxygen on the strength of gastrointestinal anastomosis

Affiliations
  • 1Department of General Surgery, Ankara University Medical School, Ankara, Turkey. volkangenc77@yahoo.com
  • 2Department of General Surgery, Ankara Penal Institution Campus State Hospital, Ankara, Turkey.
  • 3Ankara University Biotechnology Institute, Ankara, Turkey.
  • 4Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Ankara University Medical School, Ankara, Turkey.
  • 5Department of General Surgery, Antalya Education and Training Hospital, Antalya, Turkey.
  • 6Department of Medical Biochemistry, Gazi University Medical School, Ankara, Turkey.

Abstract

PURPOSE
The aim of our study is to evaluate the effects of administration of perioperative supplemental oxygen on anastomoses.
METHODS
Forty male Wistar albino rats were used in the study and randomized into 4 groups. Ischemia-reperfusion models were built in groups 3 and 4. Jejunojejunostomy was performed in all rats and assigned to an oxygen/nitrous oxide mixture with a fraction of inspired oxygen of 30% in groups 1 and 3 and 80% in groups 2 and 4. The measurements of perianastomotic tissue oxygen pressure, bursting pressure, level of hydroxyproline were evaluated and compared in all groups.
RESULTS
The perianastomotic tissue oxygen pressures, bursting pressures and levels of hydroxyproline were identified as significantly high in groups 2 and 4, administered a fraction of inspired oxygen of 80%, compared to groups 1 and 3, administered a fraction of inspired oxygen of 30%.
CONCLUSION
Perioperative supplemental oxygen contributes positively to the anastomotic healing.

Keyword

Anastomosis; Wistar rats; Oxygen

MeSH Terms

Animals
Humans
Hydroxyproline
Male
Oxygen*
Rats
Rats, Wistar
Ventilation*
Hydroxyproline
Oxygen

Figure

  • Fig. 1 The median values of perianastomotic oxygen pressures for each group. We evaluated perianastomotic oxygen pressure for each group, and identified the values of group 2 significantly higher than group 1 (P < 0.001). Similarly, we found a significant high value of perianastomotic oxygen pressure for group 4 compared with group 3 (P < 0.001). However, there were no significant differences between groups 1 and 3 and also between groups 2 and 4 (P > 0.05).

  • Fig. 2 The median values of anastomotic bursting pressures for each group.

  • Fig. 3 The median values of tissue hydroxyproline levels for each group.


Reference

1. Chen C. The art of bowel anastomosis. Scand J Surg. 2012; 101:238–240.
2. Sheridan WG, Lowndes RH, Young HL. Tissue oxygen tension as a predictor of colonic anastomotic healing. Dis Colon Rectum. 1987; 30:867–871.
3. Garcia-Botello SA, Garcia-Granero E, Lillo R, Lopez-Mozos F, Millan M, Lledo S. Randomized clinical trial to evaluate the effects of perioperative supplemental oxygen administration on the colorectal anastomosis. Br J Surg. 2006; 93:698–706.
4. Belda FJ, Aguilera L, Garcia de la Asuncion J, Alberti J, Vicente R, Ferrandiz L, et al. Supplemental perioperative oxygen and the risk of surgical wound infection: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2005; 294:2035–2042.
5. Hunt TK, Pai MP. The effect of varying ambient oxygen tensions on wound metabolism and collagen synthesis. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1972; 135:561–567.
6. Greif R, Akca O, Horn EP, Kurz A, Sessler DI. Outcomes Research Group. Supplemental perioperative oxygen to reduce the incidence of surgical-wound infection. N Engl J Med. 2000; 342:161–167.
7. Brasel K, McRitchie D, Dellinger P. EBRS Group. Canadian Association of General Surgeons and American College of Surgeons Evidence Based Reviews in Surgery. 21: the risk of surgical site infection is reduced with perioperative oxygen. Can J Surg. 2007; 50:214–216.
8. Mayzler O, Weksler N, Domchik S, Klein M, Mizrahi S, Gurman GM. Does supplemental perioperative oxygen administration reduce the incidence of wound infection in elective colorectal surgery? Minerva Anestesiol. 2005; 71:21–25.
9. Pryor KO, Fahey TJ 3rd, Lien CA, Goldstein PA. Surgical site infection and the routine use of perioperative hyperoxia in a general surgical population: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2004; 291:79–87.
10. Qadan M, Akca O, Mahid SS, Hornung CA, Polk HC Jr. Perioperative supplemental oxygen therapy and surgical site infection: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Arch Surg. 2009; 144:359–366.
11. Al-Niaimi A, Safdar N. Supplemental perioperative oxygen for reducing surgical site infection: a meta-analysis. J Eval Clin Pract. 2009; 15:360–365.
12. Turan A, Apfel CC, Kumpch M, Danzeisen O, Eberhart LH, Forst H, et al. Does the efficacy of supplemental oxygen for the prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting depend on the measured outcome, observational period or site of surgery? Anaesthesia. 2006; 61:628–633.
13. Schietroma M, Cecilia EM, Sista F, Carlei F, Pessia B, Amicucci G. High-concentration supplemental perioperative oxygen and surgical site infection following elective colorectal surgery for rectal cancer: a prospective, randomized, double-blind, controlled, single-site trial. Am J Surg. 2014; 208:719–726.
14. DuBois AB, Turaids T, Mammen RE, Nobrega FT. Pulmonary atelectasis in subjects breathing oxygen at sea level or at simulated altitude. J Appl Physiol. 1966; 21:828–836.
15. Caldwell PR, Lee WL Jr, Schildkraut HS, Archibald ER. Changes in lung volume, diffusing capacity, and blood gases in men breathing oxygen. J Appl Physiol. 1966; 21:1477–1483.
16. Montgomery AB, Luce JM, Murray JF. Retrosternal pain is an early indicator of oxygen toxicity. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1989; 139:1548–1550.
17. Schietroma M, Carlei F, Cecilia EM, Piccione F, Bianchi Z, Amicucci G. Colorectal Infraperitoneal anastomosis: the effects of perioperative supplemental oxygen administration on the anastomotic dehiscence. J Gastrointest Surg. 2012; 16:427–434.
18. Kimberger O, Fleischmann E, Brandt S, Kugener A, Kabon B, Hiltebrand L, et al. Supplemental oxygen, but not supplemental crystalloid fluid, increases tissue oxygen tension in healthy and anastomotic colon in pigs. Anesth Analg. 2007; 105:773–779.
19. Cohen IK, Diegelmann RF, Lindblad WJ. Wound healing: biochemical & clinical aspects. Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders Co.;1992.
Full Text Links
  • ASTR
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr