Korean J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg.  2015 Aug;19(3):103-108. 10.14701/kjhbps.2015.19.3.103.

Comparison between operative versus non-operative management of traumatic liver injury

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Surgery, The Catholic University of Korea, St. Vincent's Hospital, Suwon, Korea. wonys@catholic.ac.kr
  • 2Department of Hepato-biliary and Pancreas Surgery, College of Medicine, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea.

Abstract

BACKGROUNDS/AIMS
The aim of this study was to compare operative versus non-operative management of patients with liver injury and to ascertain the differences of the clinical features.
METHODS
From April 2000 to July 2012, 191 patients were admitted to Seoul St. Mary's Hospital and St. Vincent's Hospital for liver injuries. Of these, 148 patients were included in this study. All patients were diagnosed using computed tomography (CT). The liver injury was graded in accordance with the American Association for the Surgery of Trauma liver injury scoring scale. Patients were divided into two groups: those who underwent surgery and those treated with non-operative management (NOM). There was a comparison between these two groups concerning the clinical characteristics, grade of liver injury, hemodynamic stability, laboratory findings, and mortality.
RESULTS
According to the 148 patient records evaluated, 108 (72.9%) patients were treated with NOM, and 40 (27.1%) underwent surgery. Patients treated with NOM had significantly fewer severe injuries as rated using the Revised Traumatic Injury Scale, Injury Severity Score, and Glasgow Coma Scale. Grade of liver injury and number of patients with extravasation of contrast dye on CT and hemoperitoneum were higher in the operative group than in the NOM group. There were significant differences between the two groups for: heart rate, respiratory rate, systolic blood pressure, and mean hemoglobin levels at admission and after 4 hours. The operative group experienced a significantly higher mortality than the NOM group.
CONCLUSIONS
The results of our study suggest that hemodynamic stability and the following should be considered for deciding the treatment for liver injuries: grade of liver injury, amount of blood loss, and injury scales scores.

Keyword

Liver; Abdominal injury; Liver injury; Trauma; Operation

MeSH Terms

Abdominal Injuries
Blood Pressure
Glasgow Coma Scale
Heart Rate
Hemodynamics
Hemoperitoneum
Humans
Injury Severity Score
Liver*
Mortality
Respiratory Rate
Seoul
Weights and Measures

Reference

1. Croce MA, Fabian TC, Menke PG, Waddle-Smith L, Minard G, Kudsk KA, et al. Nonoperative management of blunt hepatic trauma is the treatment of choice for hemodynamically stable patients. Results of a prospective trial. Ann Surg. 1995; 221:744–753. PMID: 7794078.
Article
2. David Richardson J, Franklin GA, Lukan JK, Carrillo EH, Spain DA, Miller FB, et al. Evolution in the management of hepatic trauma: a 25-year perspective. Ann Surg. 2000; 232:324–330. PMID: 10973382.
Article
3. Hurtuk M, Reed RL 2nd, Esposito TJ, Davis KA, Luchette FA. Trauma surgeons practice what they preach: The NTDB story on solid organ injury management. J Trauma. 2006; 61:243–254. PMID: 16917435.
Article
4. Trunkey DD. Hepatic trauma: contemporary management. Surg Clin North Am. 2004; 84:437–450. PMID: 15062654.
Article
5. Strong RW, Lynch SV, Wall DR, Liu CL. Anatomic resection for severe liver trauma. Surgery. 1998; 123:251–257. PMID: 9526515.
Article
6. Tinkoff G, Esposito TJ, Reed J, Kilgo P, Fildes J, Pasquale M, et al. American Association for the Surgery of Trauma Organ Injury Scale I: spleen, liver, and kidney, validation based on the National Trauma Data Bank. J Am Coll Surg. 2008; 207:646–655. PMID: 18954775.
Article
7. Scollay JM, Beard D, Smith R, McKeown D, Garden OJ, Parks R. Eleven years of liver trauma: the Scottish experience. World J Surg. 2005; 29:744–749. PMID: 15880277.
Article
8. Pachter HL, Knudson MM, Esrig B, Ross S, Hoyt D, Cogbill T, et al. Status of nonoperative management of blunt hepatic injuries in 1995: a multicenter experience with 404 patients. J Trauma. 1996; 40:31–38. PMID: 8576995.
9. Brammer RD, Bramhall SR, Mirza DF, Mayer AD, McMaster P, Buckels JA. A 10-year experience of complex liver trauma. Br J Surg. 2002; 89:1532–1537. PMID: 12445061.
Article
10. John TG, Greig JD, Johnstone AJ, Garden OJ. Liver trauma: a 10-year experience. Br J Surg. 1992; 79:1352–1356. PMID: 1486439.
Article
11. Krige JE, Bornman PC, Terblanche J. Liver trauma in 446 patients. S Afr J Surg. 1997; 35:10–15. PMID: 9164149.
12. Fabian TC, Croce MA, Stanford GG, Payne LW, Mangiante EC, Voeller GR, et al. Factors affecting morbidity following hepatic trauma. A prospective analysis of 482 injuries. Ann Surg. 1991; 213:540–547. PMID: 2039284.
13. Lucas CE, Ledgerwood AM. Changing times and the treatment of liver injury. Am Surg. 2000; 66:337–341. PMID: 10776869.
14. Velmahos GC, Toutouzas K, Radin R, Chan L, Rhee P, Tillou A, et al. High success with nonoperative management of blunt hepatic trauma: the liver is a sturdy organ. Arch Surg. 2003; 138:475–480. PMID: 12742948.
15. van der Wilden GM, Velmahos GC, Joseph DK, Jacobs L, Debusk MG, Adams CA, et al. Successful nonoperative management of the most severe blunt renal injuries: a multicenter study of the research consortium of New England Centers for Trauma. JAMA Surg. 2013; 148:924–931. PMID: 23945834.
16. Zago TM, Pereira BM, Calderan TR, Hirano ES, Rizoli S, Fraga GP. Blunt hepatic trauma: comparison between surgical and nonoperative treatment. Rev Col Bras Cir. 2012; 39:307–313. PMID: 22936230.
17. Kozar RA, Moore JB, Niles SE, Holcomb JB, Moore EE, Cothren CC, et al. Complications of nonoperative management of high-grade blunt hepatic injuries. J Trauma. 2005; 59:1066–1071. PMID: 16385280.
Article
18. Goldman R, Zilkoski M, Mullins R, Mayberry J, Deveney C, Trunkey D. Delayed celiotomy for the treatment of bile leak, compartment syndrome, and other hazards of nonoperative management of blunt liver injury. Am J Surg. 2003; 185:492–497. PMID: 12727573.
Article
19. Fang JF, Wong YC, Lin BC, Hsu YP, Chen MF. The CT risk factors for the need of operative treatment in initially hemodynamically stable patients after blunt hepatic trauma. J Trauma. 2006; 61:547–553. PMID: 16966985.
Article
20. Chen RJ, Fang JF, Lin BC, Hsu YP, Kao JL, Chen MF. Factors determining operative mortality of grade V blunt hepatic trauma. J Trauma. 2000; 49:886–891. PMID: 11086781.
Article
21. Asfar S, Khoursheed M, Al-Saleh M, Alfawaz AA, Farghaly MM, Nur AM. Liver Trauma Registry Group. Management of liver trauma in Kuwait. Med Princ Pract. 2014; 23:160–166. PMID: 24457986.
Article
22. Velmahos GC, Toutouzas KG, Radin R, Chan L, Demetriades D. Nonoperative treatment of blunt injury to solid abdominal organs: a prospective study. Arch Surg. 2003; 138:844–851. PMID: 12912742.
Full Text Links
  • KJHBPS
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr