Korean J Orthod.  2013 Jun;43(3):127-133. 10.4041/kjod.2013.43.3.127.

Effects of silanation time on shear bond strength between a gold alloy surface and metal bracket

• Jung MH
• Shon WJ
• Park YS
• Chung SH

• KMID: 1975127
• DOI: http://doi.org/10.4041/kjod.2013.43.3.127

Abstract

OBJECTIVE
We aimed to investigate the effects of silanation time on the shear bond strength (SBS) of metal brackets on gold alloy in a silicoating procedure and compare the SBS of metal brackets on gold alloy and enamel.
METHODS
Type III gold alloy plates were sandblasted with 30-microm silicon dioxide. Excess particles were removed with gentle air after silica coating, and silane was applied. Maxillary central-incisor metal brackets were bonded to each conditioned alloy surface with a light curing resin adhesive for 1 s, 30 s, 60 s, or 120 s after applying silane. The brackets were also bonded to 36 upper central incisors with the same adhesive. All samples were cured for 40 s with a light emitting diode curing light. The SBS was tested after 1 h and after 24 h. The adhesive remnant index (ARI) of the samples was also compared.
RESULTS
The 60-s and 120-s silanation time groups showed a higher SBS than the other groups (p < 0.05). Samples tested after 24 h showed a significantly higher SBS than did the samples tested after 1 h (p < 0.05). The 1-s group showed higher ARI scores. The one-way analysis of variance and Student-Newman-Keuls test showed that the SBS values of the 60-s and 120-s silanation time groups were not significantly different from the SBS values of enamel.
CONCLUSIONS
Adequate silanation time is required to produce sufficient bond strength during silicoating.

Keyword

Bonding; Biomaterial science

MeSH Terms

Adhesives
Alloys
Enzyme Multiplied Immunoassay Technique
Incisor
Light
Silicon Dioxide
Adhesives
Alloys
Silicon Dioxide

Figure

• 

  Figure 1 A, Scanning electron micrographs of a specimen after sandblasting with silica (5,000× magnification) and B, after silane application.

Reference

1. McLain JB, Proffitt WR. Oral health status in the United States: prevalence of malocclusion. J Dent Educ. 1985. 49:386–397.

2. Jung MH. Age, extraction rate and jaw surgery rate in Korean orthodontic clinics and small dental hospitals. Korean J Orthod. 2012. 42:80–86.

3. Boyd RL, Baumrind S. Periodontal considerations in the use of bonds or bands on molars in adolescents and adults. Angle Orthod. 1992. 62:117–126.

4. Jost-Brinkmann PG, Böhme A. Shear bond strengths attained in vitro with light-cured glass ionomers vs composite adhesives in bonding ceramic brackets to metal or porcelain. J Adhes Dent. 1999. 1:243–253.

5. Zachrisson BU. Orthodontic bonding to artificial tooth surfaces: clinical versus laboratory findings. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2000. 117:592–594.

6. Peutzfeldt A, Asmussen E. Silicoating: evaluation of a new method of bonding composite resin to metal. Scand J Dent Res. 1988. 96:171–176.

7. Jung MH. Direct bonding with composite resin; review. J Korean Found Gnatho-Orthod Res. 2005. 7:61–117.

8. Ozcan M, Niedermeier W. Clinical study on the reasons for and location of failures of metal-ceramic restorations and survival of repairs. Int J Prosthodont. 2002. 15:299–302.

9. Schneider W, Powers JM, Pierpont HP. Bond strength of composites to etched and silica-coated porcelain fusing alloys. Dent Mater. 1992. 8:211–215.

10. Toroglu MS, Yaylali S. Effects of sandblasting and silica coating on the bond strength of rebonded mechanically retentive ceramic brackets. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2008. 134:181e1–181e7.

11. Watanabe I, Kurtz KS, Kabcenell JL, Okabe T. Effect of sandblasting and silicoating on bond strength of polymer-glass composite to cast titanium. J Prosthet Dent. 1999. 82:462–467.

12. Shon WJ, Kim TW, Chung SH, Jung MH. The effects of primer precuring on the shear bond strength between gold alloy surfaces and metal brackets. Eur J Orthod. 2012. 34:72–76.

13. Nergiz I, Schmage P, Herrmann W, Ozcan M. Effect of alloy type and surface conditioning on roughness and bond strength of metal brackets. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2004. 125:42–50.

14. Jung MH, Chung SH, Shon WJ. Shear bond strength between gold alloy and orthodontic metal bracket using light emitting diode curing light. Korean J Orthod. 2010. 40:27–33.

15. Instructions for use [Internet]. October 22, 2012. St. Paul, MN: 3M ESPE Dental Products;Available from: http://multimedia.3m.com/mws/mediawebserver?mwsId=66666UF6EVsSyXTt4Xf6Mxf2EVtQEVs6EVs6EVs6E666666--&fn=espe_sil_ifu_we_R1.pdf.

16. Instructions for use [Internet]. October 22, 2012. Itasca, IL: Reliance Orthodontic Products Inc;Available from: http://www.relianceorthodontics.com/store/files/instructions/PorcEtch_PorcelainConditioner_032609.pdf.

17. Bishara SE, VonWald L, Olsen ME, Laffoon JF. Effect of time on the shear bond strength of glass ionomer and composite orthodontic adhesives. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1999. 116:616–620.

18. Büyükyilmaz T, Zachrisson YO, Zachrisson BU. Improving orthodontic bonding to gold alloy. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1995. 108:510–518.

19. Proffit WR, Fields HW, Nixon WL. Occlusal forces in normal- and long-face adults. J Dent Res. 1983. 62:566–570.

20. Reynolds IR. A review of direct orthodontic bonding. British J Orthod. 1975. 2:171–178.

21. Trakyali G, Malkondu O, Kazazoğlu E, Arun T. Effects of different silanes and acid concentrations on bond strength of brackets to porcelain surfaces. Eur J Orthod. 2009. 31:402–406.

22. Nebbe B, Stein E. Orthodontic brackets bonded to glazed and deglazed porcelain surfaces. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1996. 109:431–436.