J Korean Surg Soc.  2002 Aug;63(2):112-117.

Application of Positron Emission Tomography (PET) in Postoperative Follow-Up of the Breast Cancer

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea. jhyang@smc.smsung.co.kr
  • 2Department of Nuclear Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.

Abstract

PURPOSE: Positron Emission Tomography (PET) is an imaging method that can diagnose diseases by detecting physiologic and biochemical changes of the body. In this study, we attempted to evaluate the value of PET in the postoperative follow-up of breast cancer.
METHODS
From September, 1994 to December, 2001, postoperative PET was performed 67 times at Samsung Medical Center on 66 patients who underwent curative operation for breast cancer. Clinical outcomes were confirmed by clinicoradiologic courses, fine needle aspiration cytology, biopsy and operation. We reviewed the medical records and PET reports of these patients.
RESULTS
The time interval between operation and PET ranged from 1 to 88 months with a median of 26.5 months. The PET results were abnormal physical examination (23 cases, 34.3%), equivocal result of bone scan (22 cases, 2.8%), other radiologic abnormalities (9 cases, 13.4%), abnormal laboratory findings (4 cases, 6.0%), and symptoms of patients (4 cases, 6.0%). Among the 67 PET studies, 48 were confirmed as having metastasis or recurrence, while 19 did not have metastasis or recurrence. Forty-five of the studies produced true positive results, 16 true negative, 3 false positive and 3 false negative. Therefore, in the detection of postoperative metastasis or recurrence of breast cancer the parameters for the use of PET were 93.8% sensitivity, 84.3% specificity, 93.8% positive predictive value, 84.3% negative predictive value and 91.0% accuracy. On the basis of the lesion site, the accuracy of PET in the detection of bone (98.5%), lung (100%) and liver (98.5%) metastases was superior to that of local recurrence (85.1%) or lymph node metastasis (86.6%).
CONCLUSION
PET may be diagnostically helpful in a select subgroup of patients for whom findings remain inconclusive after performning conventional postoperative follow-up methods for breast cancer, especially in the detection of bone, lung and liver metastases.

Keyword

Breast cancer; PET; Postoperative follow-up; Metastasis; Recurrence

MeSH Terms

Biopsy
Biopsy, Fine-Needle
Breast Neoplasms*
Breast*
Electrons*
Follow-Up Studies*
Humans
Liver
Lung
Lymph Nodes
Medical Records
Neoplasm Metastasis
Physical Examination
Positron-Emission Tomography*
Recurrence
Sensitivity and Specificity
Full Text Links
  • JKSS
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr