Yonsei Med J.  2014 Sep;55(5):1341-1347. 10.3349/ymj.2014.55.5.1341.

Safety and Efficacy of Conversion from Twice-Daily Tacrolimus to Once-Daily Tacrolimus One Month after Transplantation: Randomized Controlled Trial in Adult Renal Transplantation

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Surgery, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon, Korea.
  • 2Department of Transplantation Surgery, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University Health System, Seoul, Korea. yukim@yuhs.ac
  • 3Department of Nephrology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Ulsan, Korea.
  • 4Department of Surgery, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Ulsan, Korea.

Abstract

PURPOSE
The purpose of this study was to compare once-daily tacrolimus with twice-daily tacrolimus in terms of safety, efficacy, and patient satisfaction.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
This prospective, randomized, open-label, multicenter study was conducted at three institutes. Patients in the investigational group were converted from tacrolimus twice daily to the same dose of extended-release tacrolimus once daily at 1 month post-transplantation, while patients in the control group were maintained on tacrolimus twice daily. The efficacies, safeties, and patient satisfaction for the two drugs at 6 months post-transplantation were compared.
RESULTS
Sixty patients were enrolled and randomized to the investigational group (28 of 29 patients completed the study) or the control group (26 of 31 patients completed the study). At 6 months post-transplantation, composite efficacy failure rates including the incidences of biopsy-confirmed acute rejection in the investigational and control groups were 0% and 10.7%, respectively; patient survival was 100% in each group. No difference in estimated glomerular filtration rate values were observed at 6 months post-transplantation (p=0.97). The safety and satisfaction profile (immunosuppressant therapy barrier scale) of once-daily tacrolimus was comparable with that of twice-daily tacrolimus (p=0.35).
CONCLUSION
Conversion from twice-daily tacrolimus to once-daily tacrolimus one month after transplantation is safe and effective.

Keyword

Acute rejection; efficacy; extended-release tacrolimus; kidney transplantation; safety

MeSH Terms

Adult
Drug Administration Schedule
Female
Graft Rejection/drug therapy/prevention & control
Humans
Immunosuppressive Agents/*administration & dosage/adverse effects/therapeutic use
*Kidney Transplantation
Male
Middle Aged
Safety
Tacrolimus/*administration & dosage/adverse effects/therapeutic use
Immunosuppressive Agents
Tacrolimus

Cited by  1 articles

Cyclosporine Sparing Effect of Enteric-Coated Mycophenolate Sodium in De Novo Kidney Transplantation
Su Hyung Lee, Jae Berm Park, Chang-Kwon Oh, Myoung Soo Kim, Sung Joo Kim, Jongwon Ha
Yonsei Med J. 2017;58(1):217-225.    doi: 10.3349/ymj.2017.58.1.217.


Reference

1. Alloway R, Steinberg S, Khalil K, Gourishankar S, Miller J, Norman D, et al. Two years postconversion from a prograf-based regimen to a once-daily tacrolimus extended-release formulation in stable kidney transplant recipients. Transplantation. 2007; 83:1648–1651.
Article
2. Alloway R, Steinberg S, Khalil K, Gourishankar S, Miller J, Norman D, et al. Conversion of stable kidney transplant recipients from a twice daily Prograf-based regimen to a once daily modified release tacrolimus-based regimen. Transplant Proc. 2005; 37:867–870.
Article
3. Krämer BK, Charpentier B, Bäckman L, Silva HT Jr, Mondragon-Ramirez G, Cassuto-Viguier E, et al. Tacrolimus once daily (ADVAGRAF) versus twice daily (PROGRAF) in de novo renal transplantation: a randomized phase III study. Am J Transplant. 2010; 10:2632–2643.
Article
4. Silva HT Jr, Yang HC, Abouljoud M, Kuo PC, Wisemandle K, Bhattacharya P, et al. One-year results with extended-release tacrolimus/MMF, tacrolimus/MMF and cyclosporine/MMF in de novo kidney transplant recipients. Am J Transplant. 2007; 7:595–608.
Article
5. Guirado L, Cantarell C, Franco A, Huertas EG, Fructuoso AS, Fernández A, et al. Efficacy and safety of conversion from twice-daily to once-daily tacrolimus in a large cohort of stable kidney transplant recipients. Am J Transplant. 2011; 11:1965–1971.
Article
6. Butler JA, Roderick P, Mullee M, Mason JC, Peveler RC. Frequency and impact of nonadherence to immunosuppressants after renal transplantation: a systematic review. Transplantation. 2004; 77:769–776.
Article
7. Weng FL, Israni AK, Joffe MM, Hoy T, Gaughan CA, Newman M, et al. Race and electronically measured adherence to immunosuppressive medications after deceased donor renal transplantation. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2005; 16:1839–1848.
Article
8. First MR, Fitzsimmons WE. Modified release tacrolimus. Yonsei Med J. 2004; 45:1127–1131.
Article
9. Regazzi MB, Alessiani M, Rinaldi M. New strategies in immunosuppression. Transplant Proc. 2005; 37:2675–2678.
Article
10. Nankivell BJ, Gruenewald SM, Allen RD, Chapman JR. Predicting glomerular filtration rate after kidney transplantation. Transplantation. 1995; 59:1683–1689.
Article
11. Chisholm MA, Lance CE, Williamson GM, Mulloy LL. Development and validation of an immunosuppressant therapy adherence barrier instrument. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2005; 20:181–188.
Article
12. Cross SA, Perry CM. Tacrolimus once-daily formulation: in the prophylaxis of transplant rejection in renal or liver allograft recipients. Drugs. 2007; 67:1931–1943.
Article
13. Kurnatowska I, Krawczyk J, Oleksik T, Nowicki M. Tacrolimus dose and blood concentration variability in kidney transplant recipients undergoing conversion from twice daily to once daily modified release tacrolimus. Transplant Proc. 2011; 43:2954–2956.
Article
14. de Jonge H, Kuypers DR, Verbeke K, Vanrenterghem Y. Reduced C0 concentrations and increased dose requirements in renal allograft recipients converted to the novel once-daily tacrolimus formulation. Transplantation. 2010; 90:523–529.
Article
15. Jelassi ML, Lefeuvre S, Karras A, Moulonguet L, Billaud EM. Therapeutic drug monitoring in de novo kidney transplant receiving the modified-release once-daily tacrolimus. Transplant Proc. 2011; 43:491–494.
Article
16. Crespo M, Mir M, Marin M, Hurtado S, Estadella C, Gurí X, et al. De novo kidney transplant recipients need higher doses of Advagraf compared with Prograf to get therapeutic levels. Transplant Proc. 2009; 41:2115–2117.
Article
17. Hougardy JM, Broeders N, Kianda M, Massart A, Madhoun P, Le Moine A, et al. Conversion from Prograf to Advagraf among kidney transplant recipients results in sustained decrease in tacrolimus exposure. Transplantation. 2011; 91:566–569.
Article
18. Wu MJ, Cheng CY, Chen CH, Wu WP, Cheng CH, Yu DM, et al. Lower variability of tacrolimus trough concentration after conver sion from prograf to advagraf in stable kidney transplant recipients. Transplantation. 2011; 92:648–652.
Article
19. Eisen SA, Miller DK, Woodward RS, Spitznagel E, Przybeck TR. The effect of prescribed daily dose frequency on patient medication compliance. Arch Intern Med. 1990; 150:1881–1884.
Article
Full Text Links
  • YMJ
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr