Brain Neurorehabil.  2013 Sep;6(2):58-63. 10.12786/bn.2013.6.2.58.

Assessment of Balance and Posture in Brain Disorders

• Kim EJ

• KMID: 1797947
• DOI: http://doi.org/10.12786/bn.2013.6.2.58

Abstract

Balance, the ability to maintain the center of gravity over the base of support within a given sensory environment, is composed of several subcomponents and influenced by several systems (sensory, musculoskeletal, and central and peripheral nervous systems). The assessment and management of balance and posture in brain disorders are complex. To make a reasonable choice about balance scales to use, it is important to understand the balance system, to have a careful understanding about measurement tools in brain disorders and have a comprehensive way to assess balance function and dysfunction. This is a challenge for balance activity measurement tools as the most balance scales needs underlying theoretical approach behind the clinical assessment. Further research is needed to develop the theoretical construct with ecological validity, the 'hierarchy' conceptual scale and combine the individual test to the patients' level of balance ability. And assessment of the minimum detectable change in each test should be included and paid attention that is vital for clinical interpretation of scores. In conclusion, a thorough assessment into the cause of balance dysfunction in brain disorders is essential to the implementation of appropriate treatment, usually a multidisciplinary approach.

Keyword

assessment; brain injuries; postural balance; stroke

MeSH Terms

Brain
Brain Diseases
Brain Injuries
Gravitation
Postural Balance
Posture
Stroke
Weights and Measures

Reference

1. Tyson S, Watson A, Moss S, Troop H, Dean-Lofthouse G, Jorritsma S, Shannon M, Greater Manchester. Development of a framework for the evidencebased choice of outcome measures in neurological physiotherapy. Disabil Rehabil. 2008; 30:142–149.

2. Kim EJ. Balance in the elderly: physiologic and rehabilitation approach. Geriatirc Rehabilitation. 2011; 1:29–33.

3. Gillen G. Stroke Rehabilitation. A Fucntion-Based Approach. Philadelphia: Elsevier;2011.

4. Weerdesteyn V, de Niet M, van Duijnhoven HJ, Geurts AC. Falls in individuals with stroke. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2008; 45:1195–1213.

5. Tyson SF, Connell LA. How to measure balance in clinical practice. A systematic review of the psychometric and clinical utility of measures of balance activity for neurological conditions. Clin Rehabil. 2009; 23:824–840.

6. Tyson SF, DeSouza LH. A clinical model for the assessment of posture and balance in people with stroke. Disabil Rehabil. 2003; 25:120–126.

7. Duncan PW, Studenski S, Chandler J, Prescott B. Functional reach: predictive validity in a sample of elderly male veterans. J Gerontol. 1992; 47:M93–M98.

8. Monsell EM, Furman JM, Herdman SJ, Konrad HR, Shepard NT. Computerized dynamic platform posturography. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1997; 117:394–338.

9. Berg KO, Wood-Dauphinee SL, Williams JI, Maki B. Measuring balance in the elderly: validation of an instrument. Can J Public Health. 1992; 83:Suppl 2. S7–S11.

10. Beckerman , Vogelaar TW, Lankhorst GJ, Verbeek AL. A criterion for stability of the motor function of the lower extremity in stroke patients using the Fugl-Meyer Assessment Scale. Scand J Rehabil Med. 1996; 28:3–7.

11. Carr JH, Shepherd RB, Nordholm L, Lynne D. Investigation of a new motor assessment scale for stroke patients. Phys Ther. 1985; 65:175–180.

12. Benaim C, Perennou DA, Villy J, Rousseaux M, Pelissier JY. Validation of a standardized assessment of postural control in stroke patients: the Postural Assessment Scale for Stroke Patients (PASS). Stroke. 1999; 30:1862–1868.

13. Verheyden G, Nieuwboer A, Mertin J, Preger R, Kiekens C, De Weerdt W. The Trunk Impairment Scale: a new tool to measure motor impairment of the trunk after stroke. Clin Rehabil. 2004; 18:326–334.

14. Tyson SF, DeSouza LH. Development of the Brunel Balance Assessment: a new measure of balance disability post stroke. Clin Rehabil. 2004; 18:801–810.

15. Ries JD, Echternach JL, Nof L, Gagnon Blodgett M. Test retest reliability and minimal detectable change scores for the timed "up & go" test, the six-minute walk test, and gait speed in people with Alzheimer disease. Phys Ther. 2009; 89:569–579.

16. Huang SL, Hsieh CL, Wu RM, Tai CH, Lin CH, Lu WS. Minimal detectable change of the timed "up & go" test and the dynamic gait index in people with Parkinson disease. Phys Ther. 2011; 91:114–121.

17. Tyson SF, DeSouza LH. Reliability and validity of functional balance tests post stroke. Clin Rehabil. 2004; 18:916–923.

18. Stevenson TJ. Detecting change in patients with stroke using the Berg Balance Scale. Aust J Physiother. 2001; 47:29–38.

19. Malouin F, Pichard L, Bonneau C, Durand A, Corriveau D. Evaluating motor recovery early after stroke: comparison of the Fugl-Meyer Assessment and the Motor Assessment Scale. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1994; 75:1206–1212.

20. Loewen SC, Anderson BA. Reliability of the modified motor assessment scale and the barthel index. Phys Ther. 1988; 68:1077–1081.

21. Poole JL, Whitney SL. Motor assessment scale for stroke patients: concurrent validity and interrater reliability. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1988; 69:195–197.

22. van Loo MA, Moseley AM, Bosman JM, de Bie RA, Hassett L. Test-re-test reliability of walking speed, step length and step width measurement after traumatic brain injury: a pilot study. Brain Inj. 2004; 18:1041–1048.

23. Paltamaa J, West H, Sarasoja T, Wikstrom J, Malkia E. Reliability of physical functioning measures in ambulatory subjects with MS. Physiother Res Int. 2005; 10:93–109.

24. Ng SS, Hui-Chan CW. The timed up & go test: its reliability and association with lower-limb impairments and locomotor capacities in people with chronic stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2005; 86:1641–1647.

25. Smithson F, Morris ME, Iansek R. Performance on clinical tests of balance in Parkinson's disease. Phys Ther. 1998; 78:577–592.

26. Qutubuddin AA, Pegg PO, Cifu DX, Brown R, McNamee S, Carne W. Validating the Berg Balance Scale for patients with Parkinson's disease: a key to rehabilitation evaluation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2005; 86:789–792.

27. Brusse KJ, Zimdars S, Zalewski KR, Steffen TM. Testing functional performance in people with Parkinson disease. Phys Ther. 2005; 85:134–141.

28. Steffen T, Seney M. Test-retest reliability and minimal detectable change on balance and ambulation tests, the 36-item short-form health survey, and the unified Parkinson disease rating scale in people with parkinsonism. Phys Ther. 2008; 88:733–746.