Clin Orthop Surg.  2013 Dec;5(4):256-262. 10.4055/cios.2013.5.4.256.

Posterior Cruciate Ligament: Focus on Conflicting Issues

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Gachon University School of Medicine, Gil Hospital, Incheon, Korea.
  • 2Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hyundae General Hospital, Namyangju, Korea. jungyb2000@paran.com

Abstract

There is little consensus on how to optimally reconstruct the posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) and the natural history of injured PCL is also unclear. The graft material (autograft vs. allograft), the type of tibial fixation (tibial inlay vs. transtibial tunnel), the femoral tunnel position within the femoral footprint (isometric, central, or eccentric), and the number of bundles in the reconstruction (1 bundle vs. 2 bundles) are among the many decisions that a surgeon must make in a PCL reconstruction. In addition, there is a paucity of information on rehabilitation after reconstruction of the PCL and posterolateral structures. This article focused on the conflicting issues regarding the PCL, and the scientific rationales behind some critical points are discussed.

Keyword

Knee; Posterior cruciate ligament; Biomechanics; Outcome; Rehabilitation

MeSH Terms

Biomechanical Phenomena
Humans
Knee Joint/*surgery
Orthopedic Procedures/*methods
Posterior Cruciate Ligament/*surgery
Reconstructive Surgical Procedures/*methods
Treatment Outcome
Full Text Links
  • CIOS
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2022 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr