Ann Lab Med.  2012 Jan;32(1):5-16. 10.3343/alm.2012.32.1.5.

Managing the Pre- and Post-analytical Phases of the Total Testing Process

• Hawkins R

• KMID: 1781432
• DOI: http://doi.org/10.3343/alm.2012.32.1.5

Abstract

For many years, the clinical laboratory's focus on analytical quality has resulted in an error rate of 4-5 sigma, which surpasses most other areas in healthcare. However, greater appreciation of the prevalence of errors in the pre- and post-analytical phases and their potential for patient harm has led to increasing requirements for laboratories to take greater responsibility for activities outside their immediate control. Accreditation bodies such as the Joint Commission International (JCI) and the College of American Pathologists (CAP) now require clear and effective procedures for patient/sample identification and communication of critical results. There are a variety of free on-line resources available to aid in managing the extra-analytical phase and the recent publication of quality indicators and proposed performance levels by the International Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (IFCC) working group on laboratory errors and patient safety provides particularly useful benchmarking data. Managing the extra-laboratory phase of the total testing cycle is the next challenge for laboratory medicine. By building on its existing quality management expertise, quantitative scientific background and familiarity with information technology, the clinical laboratory is well suited to play a greater role in reducing errors and improving patient safety outside the confines of the laboratory.

Keyword

Specimen handling; Laboratories; Quality assurance; Healthcare; Diagnostic errors; Risk management

MeSH Terms

Clinical Laboratory Techniques/standards
Diagnostic Errors
Humans
Laboratories/*standards
Quality Assurance, Health Care/standards
Specimen Handling

Reference

1. Lundberg GD. Acting on significant laboratory results. JAMA. 1981. 245:1762–1763.

2. Lundberg GD. How clinicians should use the diagnostic laboratory in a changing medical world. Clin Chim Acta. 1999. 280:3–11.

3. Laposata M, Dighe A. "Pre-pre" and "post-post" analytical error: high-incidence patient safety hazards involving the clinical laboratory. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2007. 45:712–719.

4. Stroobants AK, Goldschmidt HM, Plebani M. Error budget calculations in laboratory medicine: linking the concepts of biological variation and allowable medical errors. Clin Chim Acta. 2003. 333:169–176.

5. Gandhi TK, Kachalia A, Thomas EJ, Puopolo AL, Yoon C, Brennan TA, et al. Missed and delayed diagnoses in the ambulatory setting: a study of closed malpractice claims. Ann Intern Med. 2006. 145:488–496.

6. Hickner J, Graham DG, Elder NC, Brandt E, Emsermann CB, Dovey S, et al. Testing process errors and their harms and consequences reported from family medicine practices: a study of the American Academy of Family Physicians National Research Network. Qual Saf Health Care. 2008. 17:194–200.

7. Kachalia A, Gandhi TK, Puopolo AL, Yoon C, Thomas EJ, Griffey R, et al. Missed and delayed diagnoses in the emergency department: a study of closed malpractice claims from 4 liability insurers. Ann Emerg Med. 2007. 49:196–205.

8. Wahls TL, Cram PM. The frequency of missed test results and associated treatment delays in a highly computerized health system. BMC Fam Pract. 2007. 8:32.

9. Leape LL. Errors in medicine. Clin Chim Acta. 2009. 404:2–5.

10. Weissman JS, Rothschild JM, Bendavid E, Sprivulis P, Cook EF, Evans RS, et al. Hospital workload and adverse events. Med Care. 2007. 45:448–455.

11. Leape LL. Striving for perfection. Clin Chem. 2002. 48:1871–1872.

12. Kalra J. Medical errors: impact on clinical laboratories and other critical areas. Clin Biochem. 2004. 37:1052–1062.

13. Nevalainen D, Berte L, Kraft C, Leigh E, Picaso L, Morgan T. Evaluating laboratory performance on quality indicators with the six sigma scale. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2000. 124:516–519.

14. Plebani M. Exploring the iceberg of errors in laboratory medicine. Clin Chim Acta. 2009. 404:16–23.

15. Astion ML, Shojania KG, Hamill TR, Kim S, Ng VL. Classifying laboratory incident reports to identify problems that jeopardize patient safety. Am J Clin Pathol. 2003. 120:18–26.

16. Kalra J. Medical errors: overcoming the challenges. Clin Biochem. 2004. 37:1063–1071.

17. Kalra J. Medical errors: an introduction to concepts. Clin Biochem. 2004. 37:1043–1051.

18. Rattan A, Lippi G. Frequency and type of preanalytical errors in a laboratory medicine department in India. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2008. 46:1657–1659.

19. Bonini P, Plebani M, Ceriotti F, Rubboli F. Errors in laboratory medicine. Clin Chem. 2002. 48:691–698.

20. Carraro P, Plebani M. Errors in a stat laboratory: types and frequencies 10 years later. Clin Chem. 2007. 53:1338–1342.

21. Frankel A, Gandhi TK, Bates DW. Improving patient safety across a large integrated health care delivery system. Int J Qual Health Care. 2003. 15:Suppl 1. i31–i40.

22. Plebani M. The detection and prevention of errors in laboratory medicine. Ann Clin Biochem. 2010. 47:101–110.

23. Lippi G, Plebani M. The importance of incident reporting in laboratory diagnostics. Scand J Clin Lab Invest. 2009. 69:811–813.

24. Lippi G, Guidi GC. Risk management in the preanalytical phase of laboratory testing. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2007. 45:720–727.

25. Wagar EA, Yuan S. The laboratory and patient safety. Clin Lab Med. 2007. 27:909–930.

26. Plebani M, Carraro P. Mistakes in a stat laboratory: types and frequency. Clin Chem. 1997. 43:1348–1351.

27. Hofgärtner WT, Tait JF. Frequency of problems during clinical molecular-genetic testing. Am J Clin Pathol. 1999. 112:14–21.

28. O'Kane M. The reporting, classification and grading of quality failures in the medical laboratory. Clin Chim Acta. 2009. 404:28–31.

29. O'Kane MJ, Lynch PL, McGowan N. The development of a system for the reporting, classification and grading of quality failures in the clinical biochemistry laboratory. Ann Clin Biochem. 2008. 45:129–134.

30. International Organization for Standardisation. ISO/TS 22367: Medical laboratories - reduction of error through risk management and continual improvement. 2008. Geneva: International Organization for Standardisation.

31. Plebani M. Errors in clinical laboratories or errors in laboratory medicine? Clin Chem Lab Med. 2006. 44:750–759.

32. Leape LL, Brennan TA, Laird N, Lawthers AG, Localio AR, Barnes BA, et al. The nature of adverse events in hospitalized patients. Results of the Harvard Medical Practice Study II. N Engl J Med. 1991. 324:377–384.

33. Brennan TA, Leape LL, Laird NM, Hebert L, Localio AR, Lawthers AG, et al. Incidence of adverse events and negligence in hospitalized patients. Results of the Harvard Medical Practice Study I. N Engl J Med. 1991. 324:370–376.

34. Vincent C, Neale G, Woloshynowych M. Adverse events in British hospitals: preliminary retrospective record review. BMJ. 2001. 322:517–519.

35. Wilson RM, Runciman WB, Gibberd RW, Harrison BT, Newby L, Hamilton JD. The quality in Australian health care study. Med J Aust. 1995. 163:458–471.

36. Aspden P, Corrigan JM, editors. Patient safety: achieving a new standard for care. 2004. Washington DC: National Academy Press.

37. Kohn LT, Corrigan JM, editors. To err is human: building a safer health system. 2000. Washington DC: National Academy Press.

38. Institute of Medicine. Crossing the quality chasm: a new health system for the 21st century. 2001. Washington DC: National Academy Press.

39. Department of Health. An organisation with a memory: report of an expert group on learning from adverse events in the NHS chaired by the Chief Medical Officer. 2000. London: The Stationery Office.

40. National Quality Forum. Preferred practices for measuring and reporting patient safety and communication in laboratory medicine: a consensus report. 2009. Washington DC: National Quality Forum.

41. The Joint Commission. Update on July 2011. National patient safety goals effective july 1, 2011. http://www.jointcommission.org/assets/1/6/NPSG_EPs_Scoring_LAB_20110707.pdf.

42. Lippi G, Salvagno GL, Montagnana M, Franchini M, Guidi GC. Phlebotomy issues and quality improvement in results of laboratory testing. Clin Lab. 2006. 52:217–230.

43. Lippi G, Fostini R, Guidi GC. Quality improvement in laboratory medicine: extra-analytical issues. Clin Lab Med. 2008. 28:285–294.

44. Linden JV, Wagner K, Voytovich AE, Sheehan J. Transfusion errors in New York State: an analysis of 10 years' experience. Transfusion. 2000. 40:1207–1213.

45. Howanitz PJ, Renner SW, Walsh MK. Continuous wristband monitoring over 2 years decreases identification errors: a college of American pathologists Q-tracks study. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2002. 126:809–815.

46. Mercuriali F, Inghilleri G, Colotti MT, Farè M, Biffi E, Vinci A, et al. Bedside transfusion errors: analysis of 2 years' use of a system to monitor and prevent transfusion errors. Vox Sang. 1996. 70:16–20.

47. Williamson LM, Lowe S, Love EM, Cohen H, Soldan K, McClelland DB, et al. Serious hazards of transfusion (SHOT) initiative: analysis of the first two annual reports. BMJ. 1999. 319:16–19.

48. Valenstein PN, Sirota RL. Identification errors in pathology and laboratory medicine. Clin Lab Med. 2004. 24:979–996.

49. Linden JV, Paul B, Dressler KP. A report of 104 transfusion errors in New York State. Transfusion. 1992. 32:601–606.

50. Lippi G, Bassi A, Brocco G, Montagnana M, Salvagno GL, Guidi GC. Preanalytic error tracking in a laboratory medicine department: results of a 1-year experience. Clin Chem. 2006. 52:1442–1443.

51. Valenstein PN, Raab SS, Walsh MK. Identification errors involving clinical laboratories: a college of American pathologists Q-Probes study of patient and specimen identification errors at 120 institutions. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2006. 130:1106–1113.

52. Kost GJ, Hale KN. Global trends in critical values practices and their harmonization. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2011. 49:167–176.

53. Emancipator K. American Society of Clinical Pathologists. Critical values: ASCP practice parameter. Am J Clin Pathol. 1997. 108:247–253.

54. Dighe AS, Rao A, Coakley AB, Lewandrowski KB. Analysis of laboratory critical value reporting at a large academic medical center. Am J Clin Pathol. 2006. 125:758–764.

55. Tate KE, Gardner RM. Computers, quality, and the clinical laboratory: a look at critical value reporting. Proc Annu Symp Comput Appl Med Care. 1993. 193–197.

56. Shahangian S, Snyder SR. Laboratory medicine quality indicators: a review of the literature. Am J Clin Pathol. 2009. 131:418–431.

57. Howanitz PJ, Steindel SJ, Heard NV. Laboratory critical values policies and procedures: a college of American pathologists Q-probes study in 623 institutions. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2002. 126:663–669.

58. Joint Commision International. JCI accreditation hospital survey process guide. 2010. 4th ed. Oakbrook Terrace, IL: Joint Commission International.

59. College of Americal Pathologists. Laboratory accreditation program. Laboratory general checklist. 2010. Northfield, IL: College of American Pathologists.

60. International Organization for Standardization. ISO 15189: Medical laboratories - particular requirements for quality and competence. 2007. Geneva: International Organization for Standardization.

61. Don-Wauchope AC, Chetty VT. Laboratory defined critical value limits: how do hospital physicians perceive laboratory based critical values? Clin Biochem. 2009. 42:766–770.

62. Cooper G, DeJonge N, Ehrmeyer S, Yundt-Pacheco J, Jansen R, Ricós C, et al. Collective opinion paper on findings of the 2010 convocation of experts on laboratory quality. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2011. 49:793–802.

63. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. EP18-A2: Risk management techniques to identify and control laboratory error sources. Approver guideline. 2009. 2nd ed. Wayne, PA: Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute.

64. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. EP23-P: Laboratory quality control based on risk management. 2010. Wayne, PA: Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute.

65. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. GP32-A: Management of non-conforming laboratory event. 2007. Wayne, PA: Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute.

66. Reason J. Human error: models and management. BMJ. 2000. 320:768–770.

67. Lippi G, Banfi G, Buttarello M, Ceriotti F, Daves M, Dolci A, et al. Recommendations for detection and management of unsuitable samples in clinical laboratories. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2007. 45:728–736.

68. The Quality of Diagnostic Samples. Errors in laboratory medicine. Update on 2009. http://www.diagnosticsample.com/home.php3?lang=en.

69. Use of anticoagulants in diagnostic laboratory investigations. World Health Organisation. Update on Jan 2002. http://whqlibdoc.who.int/hq/2002/WHO_DIL_LAB_99.1_Rev.2.pdf.

70. Resource centre. Global Preanalytical Scientific Committee. Update on Nov 2011. http://www.specimencare.com/index.asp.

71. Greiner Bio-One. Venous blood collection. Update on 2007. http://www.gbo.com/en/index_1593.php .

72. Becton, Dickinson and Company. Newsletters: Labnotes. Update on 2011. http://www.bd.com/vacutainer/labnotes/ .

73. Radiometer America. Update on 2011. Downloads and Links. http://avoidpreanalyticalerrors.com/downloads-link.html .

74. Livesey JH, Ellis MJ, Evans MJ. Pre-analytical requirements. Clin Biochem Rev. 2008. 29:Suppl 1. S11–S15.

75. Alsina MJ, Alvarez V, Barba N, Bullich S, Cortés M, Escoda I, et al. Pre-analytical quality control program - an overview of results (2001-2005 summary). Clin Chem Lab Med. 2008. 46:849–854.

76. Khoury M, Burnett L, Mackay MA. Error rates in Australian chemical pathology laboratories. Med J Aust. 1996. 165:128–130.

77. Lippi G, Chance JJ, Church S, Dazzi P, Fontana R, Giavarina D, et al. Preanalytical quality improvement: from dream to reality. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2011. 49:1113–1126.

78. Llopis MA, Trujillo G, Llovet MI, Tarrés E, Ibarz M, Biosca C, et al. Quality indicators and specifications for key analytical-extranalytical processes in the clinical laboratory. Five years' experience using the Six Sigma concept. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2011. 49:463–470.

79. Sciacovelli L, Plebani M. The IFCC working group on laboratory errors and patient safety. Clin Chim Acta. 2009. 404:79–85.

80. Plebani M, Sciacovelli L, Lippi G. Quality indicators for laboratory diagnostics: consensus is needed. Ann Clin Biochem. 2011. 48:479.

81. Sciacovelli L, O'Kane M, Skaik YA, Caciagli P, Pellegrini C, Da Rin G, et al. Quality indicators in laboratory medicine: from theory to practice. Preliminary data from the IFCC working group project "Laboratory Errors and Patient Safety". Clin Chem Lab Med. 2011. 49:835–844.

82. Wagar EA, Stankovic AK, Wilkinson DS, Walsh M, Souers RJ. Assessment monitoring of laboratory critical values: a college of American pathologists Q-tracks study of 180 institutions. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2007. 131:44–49.

83. Piva E, Sciacovelli L, Zaninotto M, Laposata M, Plebani M. Evaluation of effectiveness of a computerized notification system for reporting critical values. Am J Clin Pathol. 2009. 131:432–441.

84. Piva E, Sciacovelli L, Laposata M, Plebani M. Assessment of critical values policies in Italian institutions: comparison with the US situation. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2010. 48:461–468.

85. Barth JH. Clinical quality indicators in laboratory medicine: a survey of current practice in the UK. Ann Clin Biochem. 2011. 48:238–240.

86. Plebani M, Sciacovelli L, Lippi G. Quality indicators for laboratory diagnostics: consensus is needed. Ann Clin Biochem. 2011. 48:479.

87. Lippi G, Guidi GC, Mattiuzzi C, Plebani M. Preanalytical variability: the dark side of the moon in laboratory testing. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2006. 44:358–365.

88. Howanitz PJ. Errors in laboratory medicine: practical lessons to improve patient safety. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2005. 129:1252–1261.

89. Hawkins RC. Laboratory turnaround time. Clin Biochem Rev. 2007. 28:179–194.

90. Howanitz PJ, Cembrowski GS, Steindel SJ, Long TA. Physician goals and laboratory test turnaround times. A college of American pathologists Q-probes study of 2763 clinicians and 722 institutions. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 1993. 117:22–28.

91. Steindel SJ, Howanitz PJ. Physician satisfaction and emergency department laboratory test turnaround time. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2001. 125:863–871.

92. Valenstein P, Schifman RB. Duplicate laboratory orders: a college of American pathologists Q-Probes study of thyrotropin requests in 502 institutions. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 1996. 120:917–921.

93. Hawkins RC. Potentially inappropriate repeat laboratory testing in inpatients. Clin Chem. 2006. 52:784–785.

94. Bates DW, Kuperman GJ, Rittenberg E, Teich JM, Fiskio J, Ma'luf N, et al. A randomized trial of a computer-based intervention to reduce utilization of redundant laboratory tests. Am J Med. 1999. 106:144–150.

95. Bates DW, Boyle DL, Rittenberg E, Kuperman GJ, Ma'Luf N, Menkin V, et al. What proportion of common diagnostic tests appear redundant? Am J Med. 1998. 104:361–368.

96. Guidi GC, Lippi G, Solero GP, Poli G, Plebani M. Managing transferability of laboratory data. Clin Chim Acta. 2006. 374:57–62.

97. Plebani M, Ceriotti F, Messeri G, Ottomano C, Pansini N, Bonini P. Laboratory network of excellence: enhancing patient safety and service effectiveness. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2006. 44:150–160.

98. Overhage JM, Tierney WM, Zhou XH, McDonald CJ. A randomized trial of "corollary orders" to prevent errors of omission. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 1997. 4:364–375.

99. Smith BJ, McNeely MD. The influence of an expert system for test ordering and interpretation on laboratory investigations. Clin Chem. 1999. 45:1168–1175.

100. Poley MJ, Edelenbos KI, Mosseveld M, van Wijk MA, de Bakker DH, van der Lei J, et al. Cost consequences of implementing an electronic decision support system for ordering laboratory tests in primary care: evidence from a controlled prospective study in the Netherlands. Clin Chem. 2007. 53:213–219.

101. Plebani M. Appropriateness in programs for continuous quality improvement in clinical laboratories. Clin Chim Acta. 2003. 333:131–139.