Yonsei Med J.  2010 Nov;51(6):845-849. 10.3349/ymj.2010.51.6.845.

Effects of Twice-Daily Injections of Premixed Insulin Analog on Glycemic Control in Type 2 Diabetic Patients

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Dokkyo Medical University School of Medicine, Tochigi, Japan. mondent@dokkyomed.ac.jp

Abstract

PURPOSE
Premixed insulin is effective to improve glycemic control; however, clinicians may be less likely to know which premixed insulin is appropriate for which patients. This study aimed to evaluate the effects of twice-daily injections of premixed insulin lispro on glycemic control in type 2 diabetic patients.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Forty type 2 diabetic patients, who had been treated with twice-daily injections of human protamine mixture 30/70 insulin for at least 12 months, were divided into two groups; one group whose blood glucose 2 hours after breakfast was greater than 200 mg/dL, was switched to lispro mix50, and the other group whose blood glucose 2 hours after breakfast < 200 was switched to lispro mix25.
RESULTS
Glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) significantly improved in the Mix50 group from 8.3% to 7.5% (at 12 weeks; p < 0.05), and to 7.5% (at 24 weeks; p < 0.05). On the other hand, HbA1c levels in the Mix25 group were slightly decreased from 8.1% to 7.7% at 12 weeks (p < 0.05), and to 7.9% at 24 weeks (not significant). Both postprandial plasma glucose and fasting plasma glucose levels were significantly improved in the Mix50 group, but not in the Mix25 group. Overall, 95% of subjects preferred premixed lispro insulin from human insulin in the viewpoint of the timing of insulin injection by questionnaire analysis.
CONCLUSION
Switching from human protamine mixture 30/70 insulin to lispro mix50 twice-daily injection therapy in patients with high postprandial plasma glucose could improve their glycemic control and quality of life.

Keyword

Type 2 diabetes; postprandial hyperglycemia; lispro Mix50; lispro Mix25

MeSH Terms

Aged
Blood Glucose/*analysis
Body Mass Index
Body Weight
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/*drug therapy
Female
Hemoglobin A, Glycosylated/metabolism
Humans
Insulin/administration & dosage/*analogs & derivatives
Male
Middle Aged
Postprandial Period
Protamines/administration & dosage
Treatment Outcome

Figure

  • Fig. 1 Effects of Mix25 and Mix50 treatment on fasting and postprandial plasma glucose. Values are the mean ± SD. *p < 0.05 vs. baseline. PG, plasma glucose; PPG, postprandial plasma glucose; FPG, fasting plasma glucose.


Reference

1. Ohkubo Y, Kishikawa H, Araki E, Miyata T, Isami S, Motoyoshi S, et al. Intensive insulin therapy prevents the progression of diabetic microvascular complications in Japanese patients with non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus: a randomized prospective 6-year study. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 1995. 28:103–117.
Article
2. Masuda H, Sakamoto M, Irie J, Kitaoka A, Shiono K, Inoue G, et al. Comparison of twice-daily injections of biphasic insulin lispro and basal-bolus therapy: glycemic control and quality-of-life of insulin-naïve type 2 diabetic patients. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2008. 10:1261–1265.
3. UK Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) Group. Intensive blood-glucose control with sulphonylureas or insulin compared with conventional treatment and risk of complications in patients with type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 33). Lancet. 1998. 352:837–853.
4. Roach P, Trautmann M, Arora V, Sun B, Anderson JH Jr. Mix50 Study Group. Improved postprandial blood glucose control and reduced nocturnal hypoglycemia during treatment with two novel insulin lisproprotamine formulations, insulin lispro mix25 and insulin lispro mix50. Clin Ther. 1999. 21:523–534.
Article
5. Schwartz S, Zagar AJ, Althouse SK, Pinaire JA, Holcombe JH. A single-center, randomized, double-blind, three-way crossover study examining postchallenge glucose responses to human insulin 70/30 and insulin lispro fixed mixtures 75/25 and 50/50 in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Clin Ther. 2006. 28:1649–1657.
Article
6. Mattoo V, Milicevic Z, Malone JK, Schwarzenhofer M, Ekangaki A, Levitte LK, et al. A comparison of insulin lispro Mix25 and human insulin 30/70 in the treatment of type 2 diabetes during Ramadan. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2003. 59:137–143.
Article
7. Coscelli C, Iacobellis G, Calderini C, Carleo R, Gobbo M, Di Mario U, et al. Importance of premeal injection time in insulin therapy: Humalog Mix25 is convenient for improved postprandial glycemic control in type 2 diabetic patients with Italian dietary habits. Acta Diabetol. 2003. 40:187–192.
Article
8. Malone JK, Bai S, Campaigne BN, Reviriego J, Augendre-Ferrante B. Twice-daily pre-mixed insulin rather than basal insulin therapy alone results in better overall glycemic control in patients with Type 2 diabetes. Diabet Med. 2005. 22:374–381.
Article
9. Shichiri M, Kishikawa H, Ohkubo Y, Wake N. Long-term results of the Kumamoto Study on optimal diabetes control in type 2 diabetic patients. Diabetes Care. 2000. 23:Suppl 2. B21–B29.
10. Yamada S, Watanabe M, Kitaoka A, Shiono K, Atsuda K, Tsukamoto Y, et al. Switching from premixed human insulin to premixed insulin lispro: a prospective study comparing the effects on glucose control and quality of life. Intern Med. 2007. 46:1513–1517.
Article
11. Roach P, Arora V, Campaigne BN, Mattoo V, Rangwala S. India Mix25/Mix50 Study Group. Humalog Mix50 before carbohydrate-rich meals in type 2 diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2003. 5:311–316.
Article
12. Schernthaner G, Kopp HP, Ristic S, Muzyka B, Peter L, Mitteregger G. Metabolic control in patients with type 2 diabetes using Humalog Mix50 injected three times daily: crossover comparison with human insulin 30/70. Horm Metab Res. 2004. 36:188–193.
Article
13. Koivisto VA, Tuominen JA, Ebeling P. Lispro Mix25 insulin as premeal therapy in type 2 diabetic patients. Diabetes Care. 1999. 22:459–462.
Article
14. Mudalair SRD, Edelman SV. LeRoith D, Taylor SI, Olefsky JM, editors. Intensive insulin therapy for patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Mellitus: a Fundamental and Clinical Text. 2000. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins;20–38.
Full Text Links
  • YMJ
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr