Korean J Radiol.  2009 Jun;10(3):303-306. 10.3348/kjr.2009.10.3.303.

Giant Vertebral Notochordal Rest: Magnetic Resonance and Diffusion Weighted Imaging Findings

Affiliations
  • 1Gazi University School of Medicine, Department of Radiology, Ankara-Turkey. yusuf@tr.net

Abstract

A giant vertebral notochordal rest is a newly described, benign entity that is easily confused with a vertebral chordoma. As microscopic notochordal rests are rarely found in adult autopsies, the finding of a macroscopic vertebral lesion is a new entity with only seven previously presented cases. We report here radiological findings, including diffusion weighted images, of a patient with a giant notochordal remnant confined to the L5 vertebra, with an emphasis on its distinction from a chordoma.

Keyword

Notochord; Chordoma; Diffusion weighted imaging; Magnetic resonance (MR)

MeSH Terms

Chordoma/*diagnosis
Diagnosis, Differential
Diffusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging/methods
Female
Humans
Low Back Pain/etiology
Lumbar Vertebrae/pathology/radiography
Magnetic Resonance Imaging/*methods
Middle Aged
Notochord/*pathology/radiography
Physical Therapy Modalities
Spinal Neoplasms/*diagnosis/therapy
Tomography, X-Ray Computed

Figure

  • Fig. 1 Sagittal T1- (A) and T2-weighted (B) MR images reveal well defined large intraosseous lesion with low T1 and high T2 signal within L5 vertebral body. There is no sign of bone destruction or adjacent soft tissue extension. Sagittal T2- (C), pre- (D) and post-contrast T1 weighted (E) images taken one year after patient first presented fail to reveal any changes in lesion size or characteristics. There is no soft tissue extension or enhancement following intravenous contrast injection. Diffusion weighted image obtained at same sagittal plane using single shot fast spin-echo technique at b = 600 sec/mm2 (F), and corresponding apparent diffusion coefficient map (G) show high signal intensity over lesion mostly influenced by T2 shine-through effect. Apparent diffusion coefficient measured over lesion is 1.55±0.24×10-3 mm2/sec. Compared to apparent diffusion coefficient value of normal L3 vertebral body (0.38±0.16×10-3 mm2/sec), this finding fails to reveal any diffusion restriction. CT image of L5 vertebra reformatted in sagittal plane (H) shows central mild trabecular sclerosis confined to vertebral body. Note that cortex is intact and there is no osseous destruction.


Reference

1. Firooznia H, Golimbu C, Rafii M, Reede DL, Kricheff II, Bjorkengren A. Computed tomography of spinal chordomas. J Comput Tomogr. 1986. 10:45–50.
2. Salisbury JR. The pathology of the human notochord. J Pathol. 1993. 171:253–255.
3. Peacock A. Observations on the pre-natal development of the intervertebral disk in man. J Anat. 1951. 85:260–274.
4. Ho KL. Ecchordosis physaliphora and chordoma: a comparative ultrastructural study. Clin Neuropathol. 1985. 4:77–86.
5. Darby AJ, Cassar-Pullicino VN, McCall IW, Jaffray DC. Vertebral intra-osseous chordoma or giant notochordal rest? Skeletal Radiol. 1999. 28:342–346.
6. Kyriakos M, Totty WG, Lenke LG. Giant vertebral notochordal rest: a lesion distinct from chordoma: discussion of an evolving concept. Am J Surg Pathol. 2003. 27:396–406.
7. Chauvel A, Taillat F, Gille O, Rivel J, Vital JM, Bioulac-Sage P, et al. Giant vertebral notochordal rest: a new entity distinct from chordoma. Histopathology. 2005. 47:646–649.
8. Mirra JM, Brien EW. Giant notochordal hamartoma of intraosseous origin: a newly reported benign entity to be distinguished from chordoma. Report of two cases. Skeletal Radiol. 2001. 30:698–709.
9. Herneth AM, Philipp MO, Naude J, Funovics M, Beichel RR, Bammer R, et al. Vertebral metastases: assessment with apparent diffusion coefficient. Radiology. 2002. 225:889–894.
10. Spuentrup E, Buecker A, Adam G, van Vaals JJ, Guenther RW. Diffusion-weighted MR imaging for differentiation of benign fracture edema and tumor infiltration of the vertebral body. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2001. 176:351–358.
Full Text Links
  • KJR
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr