J Korean Med Sci.  2008 Apr;23(2):315-319. 10.3346/jkms.2008.23.2.315.

Evaluating the Nickel Content in Metal Alloys and the Threshold for Nickel-Induced Allergic Contact Dermatitis

• Kim YY
• Kim MY
• Park YM
• Kim HO
• Koh CS
• Lee HK

• KMID: 1713467
• DOI: http://doi.org/10.3346/jkms.2008.23.2.315

Abstract

Many patients are currently suffering from nickel (Ni)-induced allergic contact dermatitis (ACD). There have been few Korean studies dealing with the threshold of Ni-induced ACD and quantifying the total amount of Ni in the metal alloys. The aim of this study is to evaluate the amount of Ni leached from metal alloys and Ni contents in metal alloys, and to estimate the threshold of Ni-induced ACD. All the earrings we examined leached below 0.5 microgram/cm(2)/week, the upper limit of European Union (EU) regulation, but the other metal alloys leached a much higher amount of Ni than the limit. Likewise, all the earrings we examined contained less than 0.05% Ni (500 microgram/g), the upper limit of EU regulation, but the other metal alloys exceeded this limit. Twenty Ni-sensitive subjects, who were patch-tested with various concentrations of Ni sulphate, showed positive reactions to 5% and 1% Ni sulphate, 10 subjects showed positive reactions to 0.01%, and the most sensitive subject showed reaction even to 0.0001%. The subjects in this study were more sensitive to Ni than those in the previous studies done in Europe. Taken together, strictly regulating the Ni-containing alloys that are made in Korea is needed to lower the occurrence of Ni-induced ACD.

Keyword

Dermatitis, Allergic Contact; Leaching Amount; Nickel; Threshold

MeSH Terms

Alloys/*chemistry
Dermatitis, Allergic Contact/*metabolism
Dermatitis, Contact/*diagnosis/*etiology
European Union
Humans
Irritants
Korea
Metals/*chemistry
Nickel/*analysis
Patch Tests
Petrolatum
Quality Control
Time Factors

Reference

1. Eun HC. Epidemiological and clinical review of contact dermatitis in Korea. Korean J Dermatol. 1995. 33:209–224.

2. McDonagh AJ, Wright AL, Cork MJ, Gawkrodger DJ. Nickel sensitivity: the influence of ear piercing and atopy. Br J Dermatol. 1992. 126:16–18.

3. Larsson-Stymne B, Widstrom L. Ear piercing-a cause of nickel allergy in schoolgirls? Contact Dermatitis. 1985. 13:289–293.

4. European Parliament and Council Directive 94/27/EC of 30 June 1994. Official Journal of the European Communities. 1994. July. 22. No. L188/1-2, The 12th amendment to Directive 76/769/EEC (Nickel).

5. Commission Directive 2004/96/EC of 27 September 2004 amending Council Directive 76/769/EEC as regards restrictions on the marketing and use of nickel for piercing post assemblies for the purpose of adapting its Annex I to technical progress. Official Journal of the European Union. 2004. September. 28. L301/51.

6. Jensen CS, Lisby S, Baadsgaard O, Vølund A, Menné T. Decrease in nickel sensitization in a Danish schoolgirl population with ears pierced after implementation of a nickel-exposure regulation. Br J Dermatol. 2002. 146:636–642.

7. Lee JY, Ko IJ, Kim YH, Kim HO, Kim CW. Contact dermatitis from metal working fluid. Korean J Dermatol. 1990. 28:283–287.

8. Lee JY, Yoo JM, Cho BK, Kim HO. Contact dermatitis in Korean dental technicians. Contact Dermatitis. 2001. 45:13–16.

9. Fregert S. Mannual of Contact Dermatitis. 1981. 2nd ed. Copenhagen: Munksgaard.

10. Fischer T, Fregert S, Gruvberger B, Rystedt I. Nickel release from ear piercing kits and earrings. Contact Dermatitis. 1984. 10:39–41.

11. Cronin E. Nickel. Contact Dermatitis. 1980. London: Churchill Livingstone.

12. Wahlberg JE. Petrolatum-a reliable vehicle for metal allergens? Contact Dermatitis. 1980. 6:134–135.

13. Emmett EA, Risby TH, Jiang L, Ng SK, Feinman S. Allergic contact dermatitis to nickel: bioavailability from consumer products and provocation threshold. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1988. 19:314–322.

14. Hindsén M, Bruze M, Christensen OB. Individual variation in nickel patch test reactivity. Am J Contact Dermat. 1999. 10:62–67.

15. Nielsen NH, Menné T, Kristiansen J, Christensen JM, Borg L, Poulsen LK. Effects of repeated skin exposure to low nickel concentrations: a model for allergic contact dermatitis to nickel on the hands. Br J Dermatol. 1999. 141:676–682.

16. Hindsén M, Bruze M. The significance of previous contact dermatitis for elicitation of contact allergy to nickel. Acta Derm Venereol. 1998. 78:367–370.

17. Hindsén M, Bruze M, Christensen OB. The significance of previous allergic contact dermatitis for elicitation of delayed hypersensitivity to nickel. Contact Dermatitis. 1997. 37:101–106.

18. Allenby CF, Goodwin BF. Influence of detergent washing powders on minimal eliciting patch test concentrations of nickel and chromium. Contact Dermatitis. 1983. 9:491–499.

19. Rystedt I, Fischer T. Relationship between nickel and cobalt sensitization in hard metal workers. Contact Dermatitis. 1983. 9:195–200.

20. Wahlberg JE, Skog E. Nickel allergy and atopy. Threshold of nickel sensitivity and immunoglobulin E determinations. Br J Dermatol. 1971. 85:97–104.