Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol.  2008 Jun;1(2):103-109. 10.3342/ceo.2008.1.2.103.

Use of 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography in Patients with Rare Head and Neck Cancers

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Otolaryngology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea. sykim2@amc.seoul.kr
  • 2Department of Nuclear Medicine, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
  • 3Department of Radiology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
  • 4Department of Pathology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.

Abstract


OBJECTIVES
The clinical utility of (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) has been demonstrated in major head and neck cancers (HNCs) but is unclear in rare HNCs. We therefore evaluated FDG PET in the management of patients with rare HNCs. METHODS: FDG PET and CT/MRI scanning were performed at the initial staging and/or the follow-up in 24 patients with rare HNCs, 10 with melanoma, 9 with sarcoma, 3 with olfactory neuroblastomas, and 2 with basal cell carcinoma. The diagnostic accuracy of CT and FDG PET for detecting primary tumors and metastases were compared with a histopathologic reference. The association between the PET results and the clinicopathologic parameters predicting tumor invasion, histologic grade and disease-free survival (DFS), was assessed. RESULTS: The overall accuracies of FDG PET and CT/MRI were 92% and 79%, respectively, for detecting primary tumors and 91% and 74%, respectively, for nodal metastases, but the differences were not significant due to the small number of patients. The sensitivity and specificity of FDG PET for detecting distant metastases and second primary tumors were 100% and 87%, respectively. Follow-up FDG PET correctly diagnosed locoregional recurrence in all 12 patients, as shown by biopsy, and distant metastases in 6 patients. However, thickness of melanoma, histologic grade of sarcoma, and DFS were not associated with tumor FDG uptake. CONCLUSION: FDG PET may be useful for staging, posttreatment monitoring, and detection of distant metastases and second primary tumors in patients with rare HNCs.

Keyword

Head and neck neoplasms; Fluorodeoxyglucose; Positron-emission tomography; Neoplasm staging; Surveillance

MeSH Terms

Biopsy
Carcinoma, Basal Cell
Disease-Free Survival
Electrons
Esthesioneuroblastoma, Olfactory
Follow-Up Studies
Head
Head and Neck Neoplasms
Humans
Melanoma
Neck
Neoplasm Metastasis
Neoplasm Staging
Positron-Emission Tomography
Recurrence
Sarcoma
Sensitivity and Specificity

Figure

  • Fig. 1 Detection of primary tumor and nodal metastasis by FDG PET. (A-C) Whole body FDG PET showing focal FDG uptake in the left anterior nasal cavity (arrowheads) and upper neck (arrows) of a 40-yr-old melanoma patient (case no. 5). (D, E) Axial CT scans showing the ab-sence of significant lesions in the nasal cavity and upper neck. Both lesions were confirmed by surgical pathology.

  • Fig. 2 False results of both FDG PET and MRI. (A, B) Whole body FDG PET showing focal FDG uptake in the left posterior neck (black arrows) and no other sites of a 22-yr-old sarcoma patient (case no. 19). (C) Gadolinium-enhanced axial T1-weighted MR image showing a strongly enhancing lymph node (white arrow). Surgical pathology revealed a 1-cm-sized, round cell sarcoma in the skin and superficial subcutaneous tissue on the left scalp but no cervical nodal metastases. The positive node on PET and MRI was a reactive lymph node.

  • Fig. 3 Detection of regional recurrence and distant metastasis by FDG PET. (A-C) Whole body FDG PET showing focal FDG uptakes in the left neck (arrows) and L1 vertebra (arrowheads) of a 64-yr-old melanoma patient (case no. 9). (D) Axial CT scan showing a bony metastatic lesion in the left side of the L1 vertebral body.


Reference

1. Jemal A, Siegel R, Ward E, Murray T, Xu J, Thun MJ. Cancer statistics, 2007. CA Cancer J Clin. 2007; Jan–Feb. 57(1):43–66. PMID: 17237035.
Article
2. Zimmer LA, Branstetter BF, Nayak JV, Johnson JT. Current use of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography and combined positron emission tomography and computed tomography in squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. Laryngoscope. 2005; 11. 115(11):2029–2034. PMID: 16319618.
3. Menda Y, Graham MM. Update on 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose/positron emission tomography and positron emission tomography/computed tomography imaging of squamous head and neck cancers. Semin Nucl Med. 2005; 10. 35(4):214–219. PMID: 16150243.
4. Kostakoglu L, Leonard JP, Kuji I, Coleman M, Vallabhajosula S, Goldsmith SJ. Comparison of fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography and Ga-67 scintigraphy in evaluation of lymphoma. Cancer. 2002; 2. 15. 94(4):879–888. PMID: 11920454.
Article
5. Schöder H, Yeung HW. Positron emission imaging of head and neck cancer, including thyroid carcinoma. Semin Nucl Med. 2004; 7. 34(3):180–197. PMID: 15202100.
Article
6. Rohren EM, Turkington TG, Coleman RE. Clinical applications of PET in oncology. Radiology. 2004; 5. 231(2):305–332. PMID: 15044750.
Article
7. Adams S, Baum RP, Stuckensen T, Bitter K, Hör G. Prospective comparison of 18F-FDG PET with conventional imaging modalities (CT, MRI, US) in lymph node staging of head and neck cancer. Eur J Nucl Med. 1998; 9. 25(9):1255–1260. PMID: 9724374.
8. Stokkel MP, ten Broek FW, Hordijk GJ, Koole R, van Rijk PP. Preoperative evaluation of patients with primary head and neck cancer using dual-head 18fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography. Ann Surg. 2000; 2. 231(2):229–234. PMID: 10674615.
Article
9. Kresnik E, Mikosch P, Gallowitsch HJ, Kogler D, Wiesser S, Heinisch M, et al. Evaluation of head and neck cancer with 18F-FDG PET: a comparison with conventional methods. Eur J Nucl Med. 2001; 7. 28(7):816–821. PMID: 11504077.
Article
10. Roh JL, Ryu CH, Choi SH, Kim JS, Lee JH, Cho KJ, et al. Clinical utility of 18F-FDG PET for patients with salivary gland malignancies. J Nucl Med. 2007; 2. 48(2):240–246. PMID: 17268021.
11. Bui CD, Ching AS, Carlos RC, Shreve PD, Mukherji SK. Diagnostic accuracy of 2-[fluorine-18]fluro-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography imaging in nonsquamous tumors of the head and neck. Invest Radiol. 2003; 9. 38(9):593–601. PMID: 12960529.
Article
12. Goerres GW, Stoeckli SJ, von Schulthess GK, Steinert HC. FDG PET for mucosal malignant melanoma of the head and neck. Laryngoscope. 2002; 2. 112(2):381–385. PMID: 11889401.
Article
13. Fosko SW, Hu W, Cook TF, Lowe VJ. Positron emission tomography for basal cell carcinoma of the head and neck. Arch Dermatol. 2003; 9. 139(9):1141–1146. PMID: 12975155.
Article
14. Kadish S, Goodman M, Wang CC. Olfactory neuroblastoma. A clinical analysis of 17 cases. Cancer. 1976; 3. 37(3):1571–1576. PMID: 1260676.
15. American Joint Committee on Cancer. AJCC Cancer Staging Manual. 2002. 6th ed. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag;p. 187–220.
16. Som PM, Curtin HD, Mancuso AA. Imaging-based nodal classification for evaluation of neck metastatic adenopathy. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2000; 3. 174(3):837–844. PMID: 10701636.
Article
17. Kienstra MA, Padhya TA. Head and neck melanoma. Cancer Control. 2005; 10. 12(4):242–247. PMID: 16258496.
Article
18. Kumar R, Alavi A. Clinical applications of fluorodeoxyglucose--positron emission tomography in the management of malignant melanoma. Curr Opin Oncol. 2005; 3. 17(2):154–159. PMID: 15725921.
Article
19. Mijnhout GS, Hoekstra OS, van Tulder MW, Teule GJ, Devillé WL. Systematic review of the diagnostic accuracy of (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in melanoma patients. Cancer. 2001; 4. 15. 91(8):1530–1542. PMID: 11301402.
20. Clark PB, Soo V, Kraas J, Shen P, Levine EA. Futility of fluorodeoxyglucose F 18 positron emission tomography in initial evaluation of patients with T2 to T4 melanoma. Arch Surg. 2006; 3. 141(3):284–288. PMID: 16549694.
Article
21. Wagner JD, Schauwecker D, Davidson D, Logan T, Coleman JJ 3rd, Hutchins G, et al. Inefficacy of F-18 fluorodeoxy-D-glucose-positron emission tomography scans for initial evaluation in early-stage cutaneous melanoma. Cancer. 2005; 8. 01. 104(3):570–579. PMID: 15977211.
Article
22. Mendenhall WM, Mendenhall CM, Werning JW, Riggs CE, Mendenhall NP. Adult head and neck soft tissue sarcomas. Head Neck. 2005; 10. 27(10):916–922. PMID: 16136585.
Article
23. Tateishi U, Yamaguchi U, Seki K, Terauchi T, Arai Y, Hasegawa T. Glut-1 expression and enhanced glucose metabolism are associated with tumour grade in bone and soft tissue sarcomas: a prospective evaluation by [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2006; 6. 33(6):683–691. PMID: 16506050.
Article
24. Schuetze SM. Utility of positron emission tomography in sarcomas. Curr Opin Oncol. 2006; 7. 18(4):369–373. PMID: 16721133.
Article
25. Schwarzbach MH, Hinz U, Dimitrakopoulou-Strauss A, Willeke F, Cardona S, Mechtersheimer G, et al. Prognostic significance of preoperative [18-F] fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) imaging in patients with resectable soft tissue sarcomas. Ann Surg. 2005; 2. 241(2):286–294. PMID: 15650639.
Article
26. Lund VJ, Howard D, Wei W, Spittle M. Olfactory neuroblastoma: past, present, and future? Laryngoscope. 2003; 3. 113(3):502–507. PMID: 12616204.
Article
27. Rinaldo A, Ferlito A, Shaha AR, Wei WI, Lund VJ. Esthesioneuroblastoma and cervical lymph node metastases: clinical and therapeutic implications. Acta Otolaryngol. 2002; 3. 122(2):215–221. PMID: 11936917.
Article
28. Brouwer J, Senft A, de Bree R, Comans EF, Golding RP, Castelijns JA, et al. Screening for distant metastases in patients with head and neck cancer: is there a role for (18)FDG-PET? Oral Oncol. 2006; 3. 42(3):275–280. PMID: 16266820.
Article
29. Choi JY, Lee KS, Kwon OJ, Shim YM, Baek CH, Park K, et al. Improved detection of second primary cancer using integrated [18F] fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography and computed tomography for initial tumor staging. J Clin Oncol. 2005; 10. 20. 23(30):7654–7659. PMID: 16234527.
Article
Full Text Links
  • CEO
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr