J Korean Soc Ultrasound Med.  2012 Dec;31(4):239-245.

Comparison of Diagnostic Performance of US Elastography and Conventional B-mode US in Differentiation of Breast Lesions

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Radiology, Dong-A University College of Medicine, Busan, Korea. jhrad@dau.ac.kr
  • 2Department of Radiology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
  • 3Department of Radiology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
  • 4Department of Preventive Medicine, Dong-A University College of Medicine, Busan, Korea.

Abstract

PURPOSE
The purpose of this study was to compare the diagnostic performance of ultrasound (US) elastography and conventional B-mode US for discrimination between benign and malignant breast lesions.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
During a 13-month period, 277 women with 335 sonographically visible breast lesions who were scheduled to undergo biopsy were examined with US elastography. Elastographic findings were classified as benign or malignant based on the area ratio, with 1.00 as the threshold. Findings on conventional B-mode US were classified according to the BI-RADS category, as follows: lesions of BI-RADS categories 2 and 3 were considered benign, while those in categories 4 and 5 were considered malignant. Statistical analysis included sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), accuracy, and ROC curve analysis for comparison of the diagnostic performance of US elastography and conventional B-mode US.
RESULTS
Of the 335 breast lesions, 85 (25.4%) showed malignancy on pathology. Findings on B-mode US showed malignancy in 264 (78.8%) and elastographic findings showed malignancy in 102 (30.4%). The sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and accuracy of B-mode US and elastography were 98.8%, 28.0%, 31.8%, 98.6%, and 79.4% and 69.4%, 81.2%, 57.8%, 88.8%, and 79.4%, respectively. Elastography showed significantly higher specificity and PPV and lower sensitivity and NPV, compared with B-mode US (p < 0.001). The area under the ROC curve (AUC value) was 0.761 for elastography, and 0.634 for B-mode US (p < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS
US elastography can improve specificity and PPV of B-mode US, but with significant sacrifice of sensitivity and NPV. Therefore, US elastography may complement B-mode US for differentiation of breast masses.

Keyword

Elastography; Breast US; Breast mass

MeSH Terms

Biopsy
Breast
Complement System Proteins
Discrimination (Psychology)
Elasticity Imaging Techniques
Female
Humans
ROC Curve
Sensitivity and Specificity
Complement System Proteins
Full Text Links
  • JKSUM
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr