1. Ascenti G, Zimbaro G, Mazziotti S, Chimenz R, Fede C, Visalli C, Scribano E. Harmonic US imaging of vesicoureteric reflux in children: usefulness of a second generation US contrast agent. Pediatr Radiol. 2004. 34:481–487.
Article
2. Bouakaz A, de Jong N. WFUMB Safety symposium on echo-contrast agents: nature and types of ultrasound contrast agents. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2007. 33:187–196.
Article
3. Claudon M, Barnewolt CE, Taylor GA, Dunning PS, Gobet R, Badawy AB. Renal blood flow in pigs: changes depicted with contrast-enhanced harmonic US imaging during acute urinary obstruction. Radiology. 1999. 212:725–731.
Article
4. Evans HE, Christensen GC. Evans HE, editor. The urogenital system. Miller's Anatomy of the Dog. 1993. 3rd ed. Philadelphia: WB Saunders;494–503.
5. Hollenberg N. Black D, Jones NF, editors. The physiology of the renal circulation. Renal Disease. 1979. 4th ed. Oxford: Blackwell;30–63.
6. Jayaweera AR, Edwards N, Glasheen WP, Villanueva FS, Abbott RD, Kaul S. In vivo myocardial kinetics of air-filled albumin microbubbles during myocardial contrast echocardiography. Comparison with radiolabeled red blood cells. Circ Res. 1994. 74:1157–1165.
Article
7. Keller MW, Segal SS, Kaul S, Duling B. The behavior of sonicated albumin microbubbles within the microcirculation: a basis for their use during myocardial contrast echocardiography. Circ Res. 1989. 65:458–467.
Article
8. Kim B, Lim HK, Choi MH, Woo JY, Ryu J, Kim S, Peck KR. Detection of parenchymal abnormalities in acute pyelonephritis by pulse inversion harmonic imaging with or without microbubble ultrasonographic contrast agent. Correlation with computed tomography. J Ultrasound Med. 2001. 20:5–14.
Article
9. Kinns J, Aronson L, Hauptman J, Seiler G. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound of the feline kidney. Vet Radiol Ultrasound. 2010. 51:168–172.
Article
10. Leinonen MR, Raekallio MR, Vainio OM, Ruohoniemi MO, O'Brien RT. The effect of the sample size and location on contrast ultrasound measurement of perfusion parameters. Vet Radiol Ultrasound. 2011. 52:82–87.
Article
11. Miller DL, Dou C, Wiggins RC. Contrast-enhanced diagnostic ultrasound causes renal tissue damage in a porcine model. J Ultrasound Med. 2010. 29:1391–1401.
Article
12. Nyman HT, Kristensen AT, Kjelgaard-Hansen M, McEvoy FJ. Contrast-enhanced ultrasonography in normal canine liver. Evaluation of imaging and safety parameters. Vet Radiol Ultrasound. 2005. 46:243–250.
Article
13. O'Brien RT, Iani M, Matheson J, Delaney F, Young K. Contrast harmonic ultrasound of spontaneous liver nodules in 32 dogs. Vet Radiol Ultrasound. 2004. 45:547–553.
14. Pallone TL, Zhang Z, Rhinehart K. Physiology of the renal medullary microcirculation. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol. 2003. 284:F253–F266.
Article
15. Pietra M, Brini E, Fracassi F, Diana A, Cipone M. Use of the galactose-based contrast agent SHU 508A (Levovist) in renal ultrasonography of the dog. Vet Res Commun. 2005. 29:Suppl 2. 305–307.
Article
16. Quaia E. Microbubble ultrasound contrast agents: an update. Eur Radiol. 2007. 17:1995–2008.
Article
17. Rademacher N, Ohlerth S, Scharf G, Laluhova D, Sieber-Ruckstuhl N, Alt M, Roos M, Grest P, Kaser-Hotz B. Contrast-enhanced power and color Doppler ultrasonography of the pancreas in healthy and diseased cats. J Vet Intern Med. 2008. 22:1310–1316.
Article
18. Waller KR, O'Brien RT, Zagzebski JA. Quantitative contrast ultrasound analysis of renal perfusion in normal dogs. Vet Radiol Ultrasound. 2007. 48:373–377.
Article
19. Wei K, Le E, Bin JP, Coggins M, Thorpe J, Kaul S. Quantification of renal blood flow with contrast-enhanced ultrasound. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2001. 37:1135–1140.
Article