Korean J Radiol.  2008 Oct;9(5):416-419. 10.3348/kjr.2008.9.5.416.

Radiation Exposure to Premature Infants in a Neonatal Intensive Care Unit in Turkey

Affiliations
  • 1Ankara University, Institute of Nuclear Science, Tandogan, Ankara, Turkey. olgar@eng.ankara.edu.tr
  • 2Gazi University Faculty of Medicine, Division of Neonatology Besevler, Ankara, Turkey.

Abstract


OBJECTIVE
The aim of this work was to determine the radiation dose received by infants from radiographic exposure and the contribution from scatter radiation due to radiographic exposure of other infants in the same room. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated the entrance skin doses (ESDs) and effective doses of 23 infants with a gestational age as low as 28 weeks. ESDs were determined from tube output measurements (ESD(TO)) (n = 23) and from the use of thermoluminescent dosimetry (ESD(TLD)) (n = 16). Scattered radiation was evaluated using a 5 cm Perspex phantom. Effective doses were estimated from ESD(TO) by Monte Carlo computed software and radiation risks were estimated from the effective dose. ESD(TO) and ESD(TLD) were correlated using linear regression analysis. RESULTS: The mean ESD(TO) for the chest and abdomen were 67 micro Gy and 65 micro Gy per procedure, respectively. The mean ESD(TLD) per radiograph was 70 micro Gy. The measured scattered radiation range at a 2 m distance from the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) was (11-17 micro Gy[corrected to 11-17 nGy]) per radiograph. Mean effective doses were 16 and 27 micro Sv per procedure for the chest and abdomen, respectively. ESD(TLD) was well correlated with ESD(TO) obtained from the total chest and abdomen radiographs for each infant (R2 = 0.86). The radiation risks for childhood cancer estimated from the effective dose were 0.4 x 10(-6) to 2 x 10(-6) and 0.6 x 10(-6) to 2.9 x 10(-6) for chest and abdomen radiographs, respectively. CONCLUSION: The results of our study show that neonates received acceptable doses from common radiological examinations. Although the contribution of scatter radiation to the neonatal dose is low, considering the sensitivity of the neonates to radiation, further protective action was performed by increasing the distance of the infants from each other.

Keyword

Radiation dose; Entrance skin dose; Effective dose; Radiography

MeSH Terms

Female
Humans
Infant, Newborn
*Infant, Premature
*Intensive Care, Neonatal
Linear Models
Male
Monte Carlo Method
*Radiation Dosage
Radiography, Abdominal
Radiography, Thoracic
Retrospective Studies
Risk Assessment
Risk Factors
Thermoluminescent Dosimetry
Turkey

Figure

  • Fig. 1 Correlation of the ESDTLD with ESDTO


Cited by  1 articles

Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia: New High Resolution Computed Tomography Scoring System and Correlation between the High Resolution Computed Tomography Score and Clinical Severity
Su-Mi Shin, Woo Sun Kim, Jung-Eun Cheon, Han Suk Kim, Whal Lee, Ah Young Jung, In-One Kim, Jung Hwan Choi
Korean J Radiol. 2013;14(2):350-360.    doi: 10.3348/kjr.2013.14.2.350.


Reference

1. Armpilia CI, Fife IA, Croasdale PL. Radiation dose quantities and risk in neonates in a special care baby unit. Br J Radiol. 2002. 75:590–595.
2. Richardson RB. Past and revised risk estimates for cancer induction by irradiation and their influence on dose limits. Br J Radiol. 1990. 63:235–245.
3. Institude of Physics and Engineering in Medicine. Report No77. Recommended standards for the routine performance testing of diagnostic X-ray imaging systems. 1997. York: IPEM.
4. Chapple CL, Faulkner K, Hunter EW. Energy imparted to neonates during X-ray examinations in a special care baby unit. Br J Radiol. 1994. 67:366–370.
5. Wall BF, Harrison RM, Spiers FW. Report No. 53. Patient dosimetry techniques in diagnostic radiology. Institute of Physical Science in Medicine. 1988. York, UK: IPEM.
6. Tapiovaara M, Lakkisto M, Servomaa A. Report STUK-A139. PCXMC- A PC-based Monte Carlo Program for Calculating Patient Doses in Medical X-ray Examinations. 1997. Helsinki: Radiation and Nuclear Safety Authority (STUK).
7. International Commission on Radiological Protection. 1990 Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. Ann ICRP. 1991. 21:1–201.
8. European commission. Report EUR 16261 EN. European guidelines on quality criteria for diagnostic radiographic images in paediatrics. 1996. Brussels: EC.
9. Hart D, Wall BF, Schrimpton PC, Bungay DR, Dance DR. Reference doses and patient size in paediatric radiology. NRPB-R318. 2000. Chilton: HMSO.
10. Duggan L, Warren-Forward H, Smith T, Kron T. Investigation of dose reduction in neonatal radiography using specially designed phantoms and LiF: Mg, Cu, P TLDs. Br J Radiol. 2003. 76:232–237.
11. Brindhaban A, Al-Khalifah K. Radiation dose to premature infants in neonatal intensive care units in Kuwait. Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2004. 111:275–281.
12. Jones NF, Palarm TW, Negus IS. Neonatal chest and abdominal radiation dosimetry: a comparison of two radiographic techniques. Br J Radiol. 2001. 74:920–925.
13. Robinson A, Dellagrammaticas HD. Radiation doses to neonates requiring intensive care. Br J Radiol. 1983. 56:397–400.
14. Schneider K, Kohn MM, Ernst G. The derivation of reference dose values to chest X-rays in radiography. Radiat Prot Dosim. 1998. 80:199–202.
15. Lowe A, Finch A, Boniface D, Chaudhuri R, Shekhdar J. Diagnotic image quality of mobile neonatal chest X-rays and the radiation exposure incurred. Br J Radiol. 1999. 72:55–61.
Full Text Links
  • KJR
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr