Korean J Radiol.  2012 Apr;13(2):182-188. 10.3348/kjr.2012.13.2.182.

Fluoroscopically Guided Three-Tube Insertion for the Treatment of Postoperative Gastroesophageal Anastomotic Leakage

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Interventional Radiology, Cancer Hospital of Jiangsu Province, Cancer Institution of Jiangsu Province, Nanjing 210009, China. xqy1984king@163.com
  • 2Department of Thoracic Surgery, Cancer Hospital of Jiangsu Province, Cancer Institution of Jiangsu Province, Nanjing 210009, China.

Abstract


OBJECTIVE
To retrospectively evaluate the feasibility and effectiveness of three-tube insertion for the treatment of postoperative gastroesophageal anastomotic leakage (GEAL).
MATERIALS AND METHODS
From January 2007 to January 2011, 28 cases of postoperative GEAL after an esophagectomy with intrathoracic esophagogastric anastomotic procedures for esophageal and cardiac carcinoma were treated by the insertion of three tubes under fluoroscopic guidance. The three tubes consisted of a drainage tube through the leak, a nasogastric decompression tube, and a nasojejunum feeding tube. The study population consisted of 28 patients (18 males, 10 females) ranging in their ages from 36 to 72 years (mean: 59 years). We evaluated the feasibility of three-tube insertion to facilitate leakage site closure, and the patients' nutritional benefit by checking their serum albumin levels between pre- and post-enteral feeding via the feeding tube.
RESULTS
The three tubes were successfully placed under fluoroscopic guidance in all twenty-eight patients (100%). The procedure times for the three tube insertion ranged from 30 to 70 minutes (mean time: 45 minutes). In 27 of 28 patients (96%), leakage site closure after three-tube insertion was achieved, while it was not attained in one patient who received stent implantation as a substitute. All patients showed good tolerance of the three-tube insertion in the nasal cavity. The mean time needed for leakage treatment was 21 +/- 3.5 days. The serum albumin level change was significant, increasing from pre-enteral feeding (2.5 +/- 0.40 g/dL) to post-enteral feeding (3.7 +/- 0.51 g/dL) via the feeding tube (p < 0.001). The duration of follow-up ranged from 7 to 60 months (mean: 28 months).
CONCLUSION
Based on the results of this study, the insertion of three tubes under fluoroscopic guidance is safe, and also provides effective relief from postesophagectomy GEAL. Moreover, our findings suggest that three-tube insertion may be used as the primary procedure to treat postoperative GEAL.

Keyword

GEAL; Three-tube insertion; Interventional procedure; Esophageal and cardiac carcinoma

MeSH Terms

Adult
Aged
Anastomosis, Surgical
Anastomotic Leak/radiography/*therapy
Decompression, Surgical/instrumentation
Drainage/instrumentation
Enteral Nutrition/instrumentation
Esophageal Neoplasms/*surgery
Esophagectomy
Female
Fluoroscopy
Humans
Intubation, Gastrointestinal/*methods
Male
Middle Aged
Postoperative Complications/*radiography/*therapy
Radiography, Interventional/*methods
Retrospective Studies
Stomach Neoplasms/*surgery

Figure

  • Fig. 1 Intrathoracic anastomotic leak testified by CT at 1 week postoperation. Fistula was located in pleural cavity (A, black arrow). Fistula closed at 25 days (B).

  • Fig. 2 Drain tube (arrow 1) inserted through fistula with fluoroscopic guidance and distal tip of drain tube was positioned at bottom of abscess cavity (arrow 4). Feeding nasojejunum tube (arrow 2) and cases of nasogastric decompression tube (arrow 3) were placed during interventional operation for postoperative enteral nutrition supply and digestive slice drainage.

  • Fig. 3 Eleven days later, fistula (arrow 1) got smaller, after changing position of drainage tube (arrow 2) to keep optimum drainage.

  • Fig. 4 Fistula closed on 25 days. Nasojejunum enteral supports tube (arrow 1) was retained for enteral nutrition.


Reference

1. Orringer MB, Marshall B, Iannettoni MD. Transhiatal esophagectomy: Clinical experience and refinements. Ann Surg. 1999. 230:392.
2. Urschel JD. Esophagogastrectomy anastomotic leaks complicating esophagectomy: a review. Am J Surg. 1995. 169:634–640.
3. Dehn TC, Menon K. Diagnosis and conservative management of intrathoracic leakage after oesophagectomy. Br J Surg. 1999. 86:427.
4. Wright CD, Kucharczuk JC, O'Brien SM, Grab JD, Allen MS. Predictors of major morbidity and mortality after esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: a Society of Thoracic Surgeons General Thoracic Surgery Database risk adjustment model. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2009. 137:587–595.
5. Whooley BP, Law S, Alexandrou A, Murthy SC, Wong J. Critical appraisal of the significance of intrathoracic anastomotic leakage after esophagectomy for cancer. Am J Surg. 2001. 181:198–203.
6. Turkyilmaz A, Eroglu A, Aydin Y, Tekinbas C, Muharrem Erol M, Karaoglanoglu N. The management of esophagogastric anastomotic leak after esophagectomyfor esophageal carcinoma. Dis Esophagus. 2009. 22:119.
7. Crestanello JA, Deschamps C, Cassivi SD, Nichols FC, Allen MS, Schleck C, et al. Selective management of intrathoracic anastomotic leak after esophagectomy. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2005. 129:254.
8. Urschel JD, Blewett CJ, Bennett WF, Miller JD, Young JE. Handsewn or stapled esophagogastric anastomoses after esophagectomy for cancer: meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Dis Esophagus. 2001. 14:212–217.
9. Dan HL, Bai Y, Meng H, Song CL, Zhang J, Zhang Y, et al. A new three-layer-funnel-shaped esophagogastric anastomosis for surgical treatment of esophageal carcinoma. World J Gastroenterol. 2003. 9:22–25.
10. Patil PK, Patel SG, Mistry RC, Deshpande RK, Desai PB. Cancer of the esophagus: esophagogastric anastomotic leak-a retrospective study of predisposing factors. J Surg Oncol. 1992. 49:163–167.
11. Junemann-Ramirez M, Awan MY, Khan ZM, Rahamim JS. Anastomotic leakage post-esophagogastrectomy for esophageal carcinoma: retrospective analysis of predictive factors, management and influence on longterm survival in a high volume centre. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2005. 27:3–7.
12. Hu Z, Yin R, Fan X, Zhang Q, Feng C, Yuan F, et al. Treatment of intrathoracic anastomotic leak by nose fistula tube drainage after esophagectomy for cancer. Diseases of the Esophagus. 2011. 24:100–107.
13. Jiang F, Yu MF, Ren BH, Yin GW, Zhang Q, Xu L. Nasogastric Placement of Sump Tube Through the Leak for the Treatment of Esophagogastric Anastomotic Leak After Esophagectomy for Esophageal Carcinoma. J Surg Res. 2011. 171:448–451.
14. Ryan JM, Murphy BL, Boland GW, Mueller PR. Use of transgluteal route for percutaneous abscess drainage in acute diverticulitis to facilitate delayed surgical repair. AJR. 1998. 170:1189–1193.
15. Williams RN, Hall AW, Sutton CD, Ubhi SS, Bowrey DJ. Management of Esophageal Perforation and Anastomotic Leak by Transluminal Drainage. J Gastrointest Surg. 2011. 15:777–781.
16. Kanatas AN, Aldouri A, Hayden JD. Anastomotic leak after oesophagectomy and stent implantation: a systematic review. Oncol Rev. 2010. 4:159–165.
17. Tuebergen D, Rijcken E, Mennigen R, Hopkins AM, Senninger N, Bruewer M. Treatment of thoracic esophageal anastomotic leaks and esophageal perforations with endoluminal stents: efficacy and current limitations. J Gastrointest Surg. 2008. 12:1168–1176.
18. Babor R, Talbot M, Tyndal A. Treatment of upper gastrointestinal leaks with a removable, covered, self-expanding metallic stent. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2009. 19:e1–e4.
19. Leers JM, Vivaldi C, Schafer H, Bludau M, Brabender J, Lurje G, et al. Endoscopic therapyfor esophageal perforation or anastomotic leak with a self-expandable metallic stent. Surg Endosc. 2009. 23:2258.
20. Karbowski M, Schembre D, Kozarek R, Ayub K, Low D. Polyflex self-expanding, removable plastic stents: assessment of treatment efficacy and safety in a variety of benign and malignant conditions of the esophagus. Surg Endosc. 2008. 22:1326–1333.
21. Dai YY, Gretschel S, Dudeck O, Rau B, Schlag PM, Hunerbein M. Treatment of oesophageal anastomotic leaks by temporary stenting with self-expanding plastic stents. Br J Surg. 2009. 96:887–891.
22. Han YM, Kim CY, Yang DH, Kwak HS, Jin GY. Fluoroscopically Guided Feeding Tube Insertion for Relief of Postoperative Gastrointestinal Anastomotic Obstruction and Leakage. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2006. 29:395–400.
23. Ott DJ, Mattox HE, Gelfand DW, Chen MY, Wu WC. Enteral feeding tubes: placement by using fluoroscopy and endoscopy. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1991. 157:769–771.
24. Foote JA, Kemmeter PR, Prichard PA, Baker RS, Paauw JD, Gawel JC, et al. A randomized trial of endoscopic and fluoroscopic placement of postpyloric feeding tube in critically ill patients. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2004. 28:154–157.
Full Text Links
  • KJR
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr