Clin Orthop Surg.  2009 Mar;1(1):40-47. 10.4055/cios.2009.1.1.40.

Assessment of Bone Quality using Finite Element Analysis Based upon Micro-CT Images

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Internal Medicine, Endocrinology, Yonsei University, Seoul, Korea.
  • 2LCT Orthropaedic Speciality Hospital, Suwon, Korea. junehh@hotmail.com
  • 3Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon, Korea.
  • 4Department of Mechanical Engineering, Dankook University, Yongin, Korea.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: To evaluate the feasibility of a micro-image based finite element model to determine the efficacy of sequential treatments on the bone quality in a rat osteoporosis model.
METHODS
Rat osteoporosis and treated osteoporosis models were established with the bone loss, restore and maintain concept. Thirty Sprague-Dawley rats were used in this study. A sham operation or ovariectomy was performed at 20 weeks after birth, which was followed by the respective sequential trials as follows: (1) sham-operation only, (2) ovariectomy only, (3) ovariectomized rats with parathyroid hormone maintenance, (4) ovariectomized rats treated with PTH for 5 weeks and then withdrawal, (5) ovariectomized rats treated with PTH for 5 weeks and then with 17 beta-estradiol, and (6) ovariectomized rats treated with parathyroid hormone for 5 weeks and then treated with zoledronate. The histomorphometry indices were determined using the micro-images from a micro-computed tomogram. Finite element analysis was carried out to determine the mechanical properties (Stiffness and Young's modulus) of the vertebra bodies. The differences in properties between the groups were compared using ANOVA and a Bonferroni's multiple group comparison procedure.
RESULTS
The histomorphometry and mechanical properties were significantly better in groups (3) and (6) than in the groups (1) and (2) (p < 0.05). The stiffness (sigmas) and Young's modulus (E) was highest in group (3) following by group (6).
CONCLUSIONS
Finite element analysis based on micro-images provides a useful tool that reflects the changes in micro-structural and mechanical properties of a rat vertebral body with the bone loss, restore and maintain concept.

Keyword

Osteoporosis; Vertebral body; Microstructure; Micro-CT; Finite element analysis; Rat

MeSH Terms

Analysis of Variance
Animals
Female
*Finite Element Analysis
Osteoporosis/*pathology/*radiography
Rats
Rats, Sprague-Dawley
Spine/*pathology/*radiography
Tomography, X-Ray Computed/methods
X-Ray Microtomography/*methods

Figure

  • Fig. 1 X-ray transmission image.

  • Fig. 2 Three dimensional model (L1 Spine).

  • Fig. 3 Three dimensional models of the vertebral bodies after treatment. (A) OVX: Ovariectomy group, (B) SHAM: Sham operation group, (C) PTH-M: PTH maintenance group, (D) PTH-W: PTH withdraw group, (E) PTH-E: PTH following estradiol group, (F) PTH-Z: PTH following zoledronate group, PTH: Parathyroid hormone group.

  • Fig. 4 Hexahedral mesh model.

  • Fig. 5 Finite element analysis model.

  • Fig. 6 Two dimensional images (sagittal view). (A) OVX: Ovariectomy group, (B) SHAM: Sham operation group, (C) PTH-M: PTH maintenance group, (D) PTH-W: PTH withdraw group, (E) PTH-E: PTH following estradiol group, (F) PTH-Z: PTH following zoledronate group, PTH: Parathyroid hormone group.


Reference

1. Keaveny TM, Pinilla TP, Crawford RP, Kopperdahl DL, Lou A. Systematic and random errors in compression testing of trabecular bone. J Orthop Res. 1997. 15(1):101–110.
Article
2. Odgaard A, Linde F. The underestimation of Young's modulus in compressive testing of cancellous bone specimens. J Biomech. 1991. 24(8):691–698.
Article
3. Zhu M, Keller TS, Spengler DM. Effects of specimen load-bearing and free surface layers on the compressive mechanical properties of cellular materials. J Biomech. 1994. 27(1):57–66.
Article
4. Betancourt M, Wirfel KL, Raymond AK, Yasko AW, Lee J, Vassilopoulou-Sellin R. Osteosarcoma of bone in apatient with primary hyperparathyroidism: a case report. J Bone Miner Res. 2003. 18(1):163–166.
Article
5. Vahle JL, Sato M, Long GG, et al. Skeletal changes in rats given daily subcutaneous injections of recombinant human parathyroid hormone (1-34) for 2 years and relevance to human safety. Toxicol Pathol. 2002. 30(3):312–321.
Article
6. Sato M, Zeng GQ, Turner CH. Biosynthetic human parathyroid hormone (1-34) effects on bone quality in aged ovariectomized rats. Endocrinology. 1997. 138(10):4330–4337.
Article
7. Iwaniec UT, Samnegård E, Cullen DM, Kimmel DB. Maintenance of cancellous bone in ovariectomized, human parathyroid hormone [hPTH(1-84)]-treated rats by estrogen, risedronate, or reduced hPTH. Bone. 2001. 29(4):352–360.
Article
8. Wronski TJ, Yen CF, Qi H, Dann LM. Parathyroid hormone is more effective than estrogen or bisphosphonates for restoration of lost bone mass in ovariectomized rats. Endocrinology. 1993. 132(2):823–831.
Article
9. Green JR. Chemical and biological prerequisites for novel bisphosphonate molecules: results of comparative preclinical studies. Semin Oncol. 2001. 28(2 Suppl 6):4–10.
Article
10. Rüegsegger P, Koller B, Müller R. A microtomographic system for the nondestructive evaluation of bone archi-tecture. Calcif Tissue Int. 1996. 58(1):24–29.
Article
11. Muller R, Rüegsegger P. Micro-tomographic imaging for the nondestructive evaluation of trabecular bone architecture. Stud Health Technol Inform. 1997. 40:61–79.
12. Ulrich D, van Rietbergen B, Weinans H, Rüegsegger P. Finite element analysis of trabecular bone structure: a comparison of image-based meshing techniques. J Biomech. 1998. 31(12):1187–1192.
Article
13. van Rietbergen B, Weinans H, Huiskes R, Odgaard A. A new method to determine trabecular bone elastic properties and loading using micromechanical finite-element models. J Biomech. 1995. 28(1):69–81.
Article
14. National Institutes of Health. Osteoporosis prevention, diag-nosis, and therapy. NIH Consens Statement. 2000. 17(1):1–45.
15. Keaveny TM, Borchers RE, Gibson LJ, Hayes WC. Theoretical analysis of the experimental artifact in trabecular bone compressive modulus. J Biomech. 1993. 26(4-5):599–607.
Article
16. Keaveny TM, Borchers RE, Gibson LJ, Hayes WC. Trabecular bone modulus and strength can depend on specimen geometry. J Biomech. 1993. 26(8):991–1000.
Article
17. Ladd AJ, Kinney JH, Haupt DL, Goldstein SA. Finite-element modeling of trabecular bone: comparison with mechanical testing and determination of tissue modulus. J Orthop Res. 1998. 16(5):622–628.
Article
18. Linde F, Hvid I, Madsen F. The effect of specimen geometry on the mechanical behaviour of trabecular bone specimens. J Biomech. 1992. 25(4):359–368.
Article
19. Dempster WT, Liddicoat RT. Compact bone as a non-isotropic material. Am J Anat. 1952. 91(3):331–362.
Article
20. Evans FG. Mechanical properties of bone. 1973. Illinois: Charles C Thomas, Springfield.
Full Text Links
  • CIOS
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr