2. Im TH, Na DG. Annual report No. 1 2004~2006. 2007. Seoul: Korean Institute for Accreditation of Medical Image (KIAMI);p. 1–28. p. 75–105.
3. Department of education, KIAMI. The workshop for the examiners on quality assurance program (2005). 2005. Seoul: KIAMI;p. 13–31.
4. Department of education of KIAMI. The workshop for the examiners of quality assurance program (2006). 2006. Seoul: KIAMI;p. 141–177.
5. McCollough CH, Bruesewitz MR, McNitt-Gray MF, Bush K, Ruckdeschel T, Payne JT, et al. The phantom portion of the American College of Radiology (ACR) computed tomography (CT) accreditation program: practical tips, artifact examples, and pitfalls to avoid. Med Phys. 2004; 31:2423–2442. PMID:
15487722.
Article
6. Nuclear Associates 76-410-4130 and 76-411, AAPM CT performance phantom, users manual, Fluke Corporation. 2005. 3.
7. Park HJ, Jung SE, Lee YJ, Cho WI, Do KH, Kim SH, et al. Review of failed CT phantom image evaluations in 2005 and 2006 by the CT accreditation program of the Korean Institute for Accreditation of Medical Image. Korean J Radiol. 2008; 9:354–363. PMID:
18682674.
Article
9. National Council on Radiation protection and measurements. NCRP report No. 99. Quality assurance for diagnostic imaging equipment. 1988. Bethesda, Md: National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements.
10. McCollough CH, Zink FE. Goldman LW, editor. Performance evaluation of CT systems. Categorical course in diagnostic radiology physics: CT and US cross-sectional imaging. 2000. Oak Brook, IL:: RSNA;p. 189–207.
11. Judy PF, Balter S, Bassano D, McCullough EC, Payne JT, Rothenberg L. AAPM report No. 1 phantoms of performance evaluation and quality assurance of CT scanner. 1977. Chicago, Illinois: AAPM.
12. Euclid S. Computed tomography: physical principles, clinical applications and quality assurance. 1994. Philadelphia: Saunders;p. 174–199.