J Korean Acad Nurs.  2010 Aug;40(4):515-523. 10.4040/jkan.2010.40.4.515.

Educational Needs Assessment on Research Ethics among Nursing Researchers

Affiliations
  • 1College of Nursing, Pusan National University, Busan, Korea. jeongis@pusan.ac.kr
  • 2College of Nursing, Gerontological Health Research Center, Gyeongsang National University, Jinju, Korea.
  • 3College of Nursing, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea.
  • 4College of Nursing, Ewha Womans University, Seoul, Korea.
  • 5College of Nursing, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea.

Abstract

PURPOSE
This study aimed to investigate the educational needs of research ethics among nursing researchers.
METHODS
Convenience sample of 161 nursing professors and 262 master or doctoral nursing students participated in the study. Data was collected with self-reported questionnaire from June to August 2009, and analyzed with descriptive statistics using SPSS WIN (version 14.0).
RESULTS
Among 161 nursing professors, about 31.7% has educated nursing ethics in the postgraduate course. The most common course was nursing research or methodology (62.7%), and median education time was 2 hr. Areas that showed difficulty in understanding was the conflict of interest and plagiarism for professors and falsification and fabrication for graduate students. Average knowledge on the research ethics was 75.4 points for professors and 61.6 points for students based on the 100 points.
CONCLUSION
Educational needs of research ethics among nursing professors and students in the postgraduate course was high. We recommend both basic and advanced research ethics educational programs for the nursing researchers. The basic course should be at least 6 hr and include various cases and something to discuss.

Keyword

Nursing; Ethics; Research; Education; Needs assessment

MeSH Terms

Adult
Ethics, Nursing/*education
*Faculty, Nursing
Female
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
*Needs Assessment
Nursing Research/*education
Questionnaires

Reference

1. Abbott A. Science comes to terms with the lessons of fraud. Nature. 1999. 398:13–17.
2. Burkemper JE, DuBois JM, Lavin MA, Meyer GA, McSweeney M. Ethics education in MSN programs: A study a national trends. Nursing Education Perspectives. 2007. 28:10–17.
3. Burns N, Grove SK. Understanding nursing research: Building an evidence-based practice. 2007. 4th ed. St Louis, MO: Saunders.
4. Code of Federal Regulation. Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS). 2009. 07. 14. Retrieved April 12, 2010. from http://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/humansubjects/guidance/45cfr46.htm.
5. Dunn CM, Chadwick GL. Protecting study volunteers in research: A manual for investigative sites. 2004. 3rd ed. Boston, MA: CenterWatch.
6. Friedman PJ. An introduction to research ethics. Science and Engineering Ethics. 1996. 2:443–456.
7. Good Publication Practice Guidelines for Medical Journals. Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors (KAMJE). 2008. 01. 31. Retrieved April 12, 2010. from http://www.kamje.or.kr/intro.php?body=publishing_ethics.
8. Guidelines on Good Publication Practice. Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE). 1999. 04. 27. Retrieved April 12, 2010. from http://publicationethics.org/static/1999/1999pdf13.pdf.
9. Jeong IS. Developing the educational program on research ethics for nursing researcher. 2008. Seoul: Korea Research Foundation.
10. Kempers RD. Ethical issues in biomedical publications. Human Fertility. 2001. 4:261–266.
11. Kim OJ. The Nuremberg Code and ethics of human subject research. Korean Journal of Medical Ethics Education. 2002. 5:1–20.
12. Korea Food and Drug Administration. Korea good clinical practice (Document No 2007-34). 2007. 05. Seoul: Author.
13. Macnee C, McCabe S. Understanding nursing research. 2007. New York, NY: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
14. Polit DF, Hungler BP. Nursing research: principles and methods. 2004. 7th ed. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
15. Shamoo AE, Resnik DB. Responsible conduct of research. 2003. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
16. Song SS, Kim SK. Research ethics issues and problems. Innovative Polices Brief. 2006. 9:3–20.
17. Steneck N. Confronting misconduct in science in the 1980s and 1990s: What has and has not been accomplished? Science and Engineering Ethics. 1999. 5:161–176.
18. Uniform requirements for manuscripts submitted to biomedical journals: Writing and editing for biomedical publication. International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE). 2008. 10. Retrieved April 12, 2010. from http://www.icmje.org/urm_full.pdf.
Full Text Links
  • JKAN
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr