Korean J Intern Med.
1997 Jan;12(1):1-6.
Preoperative evaluation of the curative resectability of gastric cancer by
abdominal computed tomography and ultrasonography: a prospective comparison
study
- Affiliations
-
- 1Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine,
Korea.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES
We compared the ability of preoperative abdominal computed
tomography (CT) with that of preoperative abdominal ultrasonography (US) in
predicting the extent of tumor growth and the curative resectability of gastric
cancer. METHODS: Abdominal CT and US were done in 95 patients with gastric
adeno-carcinoma. The radiologic findings were prospectively compared with
surgical and pathologic findings. RESULTS: The sensitivities of abdominal CT and
US in detecting the perigastric lymph node involvement were 26.6% and 20%,
respectively. The sensitivity of abdominal CT in predicting the pancreatic
invasion (60%) was better than that of abdominal US (20%). However, there were 6
false positive diagnosis of pancreatic invasion by abdominal CT; in contrast,
there was no false positive diagnosis of pancreatic invasion by abdominal US. Of
95 patients who underwent surgical exploration, 14 were found to have
unresectable tumors because of extragastric organ involvement and distant
metastases. Abdominal CT falsely predicted 8 of 14 cases in which curative
gastric resection was impossible as resectable. Moreover, abdominal CT falsely
predicted 5 of 81 cases in which curative gastric resection was possible as
unresectable. Abdominal US falsely predicted 12 of 14 cases in which curative
surgery was impossible as resectable. CONCLUSION: Preoperative abdominal Ct and
US did not accurately predict the tumor extent and the curative resectability of
the gastric cancer. Especially, abdominal CT finding of pancreatic invasion by
gastric cancer should not be a contraindication for surgical exploration.