J Korean Acad Nurs.  2008 Aug;38(4):612-619. 10.4040/jkan.2008.38.4.612.

Economic Impact according to Health Problems of Workers

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Nursing, Osaka University, Osaka, Japan. ymlyoon@naver.com
  • 2College of Nursing, Hanyang University, Seoul, Korea.

Abstract

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to examine health problems and to estimate economic impact based on health problems of workers. METHODS: The subjects of this study consisted of 301 workers who received a group occupational health service. Data was collected from February 1 to March 30, 2006. The questionnaire contained questions based on general characteristics and the Stanford Presenteeism Scale. Data was analyzed with descriptive statistics, t-test using SPSS program. RESULTS: The primary health conditions as reported by workers were ranked in order as stomach or bowel disorders, back or neck disorders, or liver function disorders. The reason of absenteeism per worker was ranked in order as asthma, or a breathing disorder. The reason of presenteeism was ranked in order as asthma, insomnia or a sleep disorder. The cost of the total economic impact on the workplace in this study was 8,851,838 won. The cost of absenteeism per worker was 8,390 won. The cost of presenteeism per worker was 941,732 won. CONCLUSION: Presenteeism had a strong correlation to health conditions of the workers. Therefore, improving the work conditions of the workers is very important. If employers improve the health condition of workers, they will benefit from improved productivity in their business.

Keyword

Workers; Presenteeism; Absenteeism; Health

MeSH Terms

*Absenteeism
Adult
Cost of Illness
Employee Performance Appraisal
Female
Health Status
Humans
Industry/economics
Male
*Occupational Health/statistics & numerical data
Questionnaires
Task Performance and Analysis
Workplace/*economics

Cited by  1 articles

Effects of an Integrated Physical Activity Program for Physically Inactive Workers - Based on the PRECEDE-PROCEED Model -
Hye-Jin Kim, Jina Choo
J Korean Acad Nurs. 2018;48(6):692-707.    doi: 10.4040/jkan.2018.48.6.692.


Reference

1. Boles M, Pelletier B, Lynch W. The relationship between health risks and work productivity. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine. 2004. 46:737–745.
Article
2. Bramley TJ, Lerner D, Sarnes M. Productivity losses related to the common cold. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine. 2002. 44:822–829.
Article
3. Burton WN, Chen CY, Conti DJ, Schultz AB, Edington DW. The association between health risk change and presenteeism change. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine. 2006. 48:252–263.
Article
4. Burton WN, Chen CY, Conti DJ, Schultz AB, Pransky G, Edington DW. The association of health risks with on-the-job productivity. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine. 2005. 47:769–777.
Article
5. Burton WN, Pransky G, Conti DJ, Chen CY, Edington DW. The association of medical conditions and presenteeism. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine. 2004. 46:S38–S45.
Article
6. Cockburn IM, Bailit HL, Berndt ER, Finkelstein SN. Loss of work productivity due to illness and medical treatment. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine. 1999. 41:948–953.
Article
7. Collins JJ, Baase CM, Sharda CE, Ozminkowski RJ, Nioholson S, Billotti GM, et al. he assessment of chronic health conditions on work performance, absence, and total economic impact for employers. Journal of Occupational and EnvironmentalMedicine. 2005. 47:547–557.
8. Edington DW, Burton WN. McCunney RJ, editor. Health and productivity. A Practical approach to Occupational and Environmental Medicine. 2003. 3rd ed. Boston, MA: Little, Brown and Co;140.
9. Gilmour H, Patten SB. Depression and work impairment. Health Reports. 2007. 18:9–22.
10. Goetzel RZ, Long SR, Ozminkowski RJ, Hawkins K, Wang S, Lynch W. Health, absence, disability, and presenteeism cost estimates of certain physical and mental health conditions affecting U.S. employers. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine. 2004. 46:398–412.
Article
11. Hump P. Presenteeism: At work-but out of it. Harvard Business Review. 2004. 82:49–58.
12. Koopman C, Pelletier KR, Murray JF, Sharda CE, Berger ML, Turpin RS, et al. Stanford presenteeism scale: Health status and employee productivity. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine. 2002. 44:14–20.
Article
13. International statistics: major statistical index of OECD. 2007. November-a. Retrieved November 26, 2007. Korea National Statistical Office;from http://www.kosis.kr/.
14. Employment:total economically active population according to gender and age. 2007. November-b. Retrieved November 16, 2007. Korea National Statistical Office;from http://www.kosis.kr/domestic/theme/do01_index.jsp.
15. Health: Health examination of workers. 2007. November-c. Retrieved November 16, 2007. Korea National Statistical Office;from http://www.kosis.kr/domestic /theme/do01_index.jsp.
16. Lang S. Economists coin term, 'presenteeism' for on-the-job health slow downs. 2005. Retrieved May 20, 2006. from http://www.news.cornell.edu/Chronicle/04/4.22.04 /presenteeism.html.
17. Middaugh DJ. Presenteeism: sick and tired at work. Medsurg Nursing. 2006. 15:103–105.
18. Pelletier KR, Koopman C. Bringing health to the bottom line. Business & Health, Jun 15. 2003. June 15. Retrieved November 10, 2006. from http://managedhealthcareexecutive.modernmedicine.com/mhe/Absenteeism/Bringing-Health-to-the-Bottom-Line/ArticleStandard/Article/detail/134250.
19. Ruez P. Quality and bottom line can suffer at the hands of the working sick. Managed Healthcare Executive. 2004. 14(11):46–48.
20. Sanderson K, Andrews G. Common mental disorders in the workforce: Recent findings from descriptive and social epidemiology. Canadian Journal of Psychiatry. 2006. 51(2):63–75.
Article
21. Shamansky SL. Presenteeism or when being there is not being there. Public Health Nursing. 2002. 19:79–80.
22. Testa MA, Simonson DC. Health economic benefits and quality of life during improved glycemic control in patientswith type 2 diabetes mellitus: A randomized, controlled, double-blind trial. The Journal of the American Medical Association. 1998. 280:1490–1496.
Article
23. Turpin RS, Ozminkowski RJ, Sharda CE, Collins JJ, Berger ML, Billotti GM, et al. Reliability and validity of the Stanford presenteeism scale. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine. 2004. 46:1123–1133.
Article
24. Yamashita M. Influential factors on presenteeism in 3 enterprises. 2007. Osaka, Japan: University of Osaka;Unpublished master's thesis.
Full Text Links
  • JKAN
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr