J Korean Med Sci.  2025 Apr;40(15):e140. 10.3346/jkms.2025.40.e140.

Physician–Scientist Training System and Development Strategies in Korea

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Pharmacology, Chonnam National University Medical School, Hwasun, Korea
  • 2Department of Microbiology, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, Korea
  • 3Genomic Medicine Institute, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
  • 4Training Center for Innovative Medical Scientist, Korea Association of Medical Colleges, Seoul, Korea
  • 5Department of Physiology, CHA University School of Medicine, Pocheon, Korea
  • 6CHA Institute for Future Medicine, Medical Center Research Institute, Seongnam, Korea

Abstract

Physician–scientists play a pivotal role in bridging clinical practice and biomedical research, advancing medical science, and tackling complex healthcare challenges. In South Korea, the declining number of medical doctors engaging in basic medical sciences has prompted the implementation of various training initiatives since the 2000s. Notable initiatives, such as the Integrated Physician–Scientist Training Program (2019) and the Global Physician–Scientist Training Program (2024), aim to cultivate multidisciplinary physician–scientists capable of addressing unmet medical needs. This study offers a comprehensive overview of the current training systems, funding mechanisms, and strategic approaches for physician–scientists in South Korea, compares them with international best practices, and proposes actionable policy recommendations to enhance their effectiveness and long-term sustainability.

Keyword

Physician–Scientist; Training System; Development Strategy; Korea

Figure

  • Fig. 1 Training system and support programs for physician–scientist in Korea


Reference

1. Cho Y. Suggestion for the training policy of physician-scientists in Korea. J Korean Med Assoc. 2024; 67(2):68–75.
2. The Physician–Scientist Workforce Working Group. Physician–Scientist Workforce Working Group Report. Bethesda, MD, USA: National Institutes of Health;2014.
3. Kim MJ. Sixteen new integrated physician-scientists emerge, total reaches 39. Updated 2024. Accessed December 8, 2024. https://www.medifonews.com/news/article.html?no=194247 .
4. Song WJ, Lee SH, Chung JH. Current status and future direction of physician-scientists training in Korea. JID Innov. 2021; 2(1):100073. PMID: 35005682.
5. Bae EB. Preference for scientist occupation among medical and science students in South Korea. bioRxiv. February 1, 2024. DOI: 10.1101/2024.01.31.578132.
6. Korea Association of Medical Colleges. A Study on the Policy Planning for the Developing Physician–Scientist. Cheongju, Korea: Korea Health Industry Development Institute;2022.
7. Ra S. Developing Innovation Ecosystem in Biomedical Field by Establishing Organized Physician-Scientists Nurturing System in Korea. Sejong, Korea: KDI School of Public Policy and Management;2022.
8. Davila JR. The physician-scientist past trends and future directions. Mich J Med. 2016; 1(1):66–73.
9. Glickman MS. Challenges for the MD physician-scientist upon entering the lab: from the grand to the practical. J Infect Dis. 2018; 218(suppl_1):S25–S27. PMID: 30124972.
10. Strong MJ, Busing N, Goosney DL, Harris KA, Horsley T, Kuzyk A, et al. The rising challenge of training physician-scientists: recommendations from a Canadian National Consensus Conference. Acad Med. 2018; 93(2):172–178. PMID: 28817429.
11. Bensken WP, Nath A, Heiss JD, Khan OI. Future directions of training physician-scientists: reimagining and remeasuring the workforce. Acad Med. 2019; 94(5):659–663. PMID: 30640263.
12. Gotian R, Andersen OS. How perceptions of a successful physician-scientist varies with gender and academic rank: toward defining physician-scientist’s success. BMC Med Educ. 2020; 20(1):50. PMID: 32054479.
13. Omotade J, Yellin J, Heinig S. Exploring the Landscape for Physician-Scientist Training and Career Development. Steve Heinig, MA, USA: Association of American Medical Colleges;2024.
14. Choi H, Kwon C, Hwang H, Hong H. Current status and challenges of physician-scientist training in Korea and abroad. J Vocat Competence Dev Res. 2018; 21(3):67–101.
15. Kim NH, Cho JS, Kim HC. Current status of physician-scientists and suggestions for their development: bridging the three valleys of death. Health Ind Brief. 2021; 334:1–16.
16. Browne A. Prevalence and characteristics of physicians engaged in research in the US. JAMA Netw Open. 2024; 7(9):e2433140. PMID: 39316404.
17. Milewicz DM, Lorenz RG, Dermody TS, Brass LF. National Association of MD-PhD Programs Executive Committee. Rescuing the physician-scientist workforce: the time for action is now. J Clin Invest. 2015; 125(10):3742–3747. PMID: 26426074.
18. Blanchard M, Burton MC, Geraci MW, Madaio MP, Marsh JD, Proweller A, et al. Best practices for physician-scientist training programs: recommendations from the Alliance for Academic Internal Medicine. Am J Med. 2018; 131(5):578–584. PMID: 29410155.
19. Salata RA, Geraci MW, Rockey DC, Blanchard M, Brown NJ, Cardinal LJ, et al. U.S. physician-scientist workforce in the 21st century: recommendations to attract and sustain the pipeline. Acad Med. 2018; 93(4):565–573. PMID: 28991849.
20. Twa DD, Squair JW, Skinnider MA, Ji JX. The Canadian clinician-scientist training program must be reinstated. J Clin Invest. 2015; 125(12):4317–4319. PMID: 26529253.
21. Williams CS, Rathmell WK, Carethers JM, Harper DM, Lo YMD, Ratcliffe PJ, et al. A global view of the aspiring physician-scientist. Elife. 2022; 11:e79738. PMID: 36098684.
22. Forde A. An overview of German MD/PhD programs. Updated 2003. Accessed March 3, 2024. https://www.science.org/content/article/overview-german-mdphd-programs .
23. Dos Santos Rocha A, Scherlinger M, Ostermann L, Mehler DMA, Nadiradze A, Schulze F, et al. Characteristics and opinions of MD-PhD students and graduates from different European countries: a study from the European MD-PhD Association. Swiss Med Wkly. 2020; 150:w20205. PMID: 32294222.
24. Hendriks B, Reinhart M. What are the chances? Clinician scientist’ career pathways in Germany. BMC Med Educ. 2023; 23(1):642. PMID: 37679714.
25. Ishikawa M. Distribution and retention trends of physician-scientists in Japan: a longitudinal study. BMC Med Educ. 2019; 19(1):394. PMID: 31660958.
26. Yoon K, Cho Y, Kim J, Kim HS. Research for Recruiting Biomedical Scientist From Medical Doctor Graduate. Seoul, Korea: Korean Academy of Medical Sciences;2014.
27. Ahn DS, Cho Y, Rhyu IJ, Lee SH. Study on the Current Status and Nurturing Strategies for the Next Generation in Basic Medical Sciences. Seoul, Korea: National Academy of Medicine of Korea;2021.
28. Research Committee in Korea Association of Medical Colleges (KAMC). The Current State and Prospects of Basic Medical Education. Seoul, Korea: KAMC;2023.
29. Korean Institute of Medical Education and Evaluation. Accreditation standards of KIMEE 2019. Updated 2024. Accessed December 8, 2024. https://kimee.or.kr/board/data/?mod=document&pageid=1&uid=1730 .
30. Moon SH. Medical schools accelerating preparation for integrated 6-year program… Aiming to use it as an opportunity to strengthen research capabilities. Updated 2024. Accessed December 8, 2024. https://www.medicaltimes.com/Main/News/NewsView.html?ID=1157335 .
31. Lee SB. Leading the training of physician-scientists… Korea University College of Medicine partners with Yale and Johns Hopkins. Updated 2024. Accessed December 8, 2024. https://health.chosun.com/site/data/html_dir/2024/10/22/2024102201309.html .
32. The Korean Society of Medical Education. Development of a New Curriculum for the Integrated 6-Year Integrated Medical School Program. Sejong, Korea: Ministry of Health and Welfare;2024.
33. Task Force for the Study on the Current Status and Outcomes of the Medical and Dental Graduate School System in Korea Association of Medical Colleges (KAMC). Analysis of the Current Status and Introduction Outcomes of the Medical and Dental Graduate School System. Seoul, Korea: KAMC;2020.
34. Eley DS. The clinician-scientist track: an approach addressing Australia’s need for a pathway to train its future clinical academic workforce. BMC Med Educ. 2018; 18(1):227. PMID: 30285826.
35. Han H. Challenges to be addressed for the sustainable training of physician-scientists. Healthc Policy Forum. 2022; 20(3):61–67.
36. Kim IB, Joo KM, Song CH, Rhyu IJ. A brief review of anatomy education in Korea, encompassing its past, present, and future direction. J Korean Med Sci. 2024; 39(20):e159. PMID: 38804009.
37. Han D. Current status and future prospects of support policies for physician-scientists. Healthc Policy Forum. 2022; 20(3):56–60.
38. Kim EJ. Task for training physician-scientists for the promotion of the Biohealth industry. NARS Curr Issue Anal. 2024; (320):1–24.
39. Yoon HB, Park DJ, Shin JS, Ahn C. Developing a core competency model for translational medicine curriculum. Korean J Med Educ. 2018; 30(3):243–256. PMID: 30180512.
Full Text Links
  • JKMS
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2025 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr